top of page

YEAR IN REVIEW - Part  Five

(Part 5)


By David W. Virtue


VIRTUOSITY



In the orthodox DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, bishop Robert Duncan was called


evil at a special diocesan convention by pro-sodomite revisionist


forces with bleeding heart liberal laity writing letters saying that he


had stolen the church from them. Duncan had said he would allow


parishes who did not agree with General Convention election of



Robinson to choose their own pathway. In the DIOCESE OF ALBANY, a small faction of liberal priests unhappy with the way Bishops Dan Herzog and David Bena voted at GC2003 tried to pull off a coup d’etat hoping to turn the diocese towards sexual inclusion (read perversity) with an alternative vision for the


diocese. They tried and they failed.




And in the DIOCESE OF COLORADO the new bishop Robert J. ONeill who


came in on a ticket of moderation and inclusion to replace the


compromised Jerry Winterrowd asked two of the most revisionist bishops


in the Episcopal Church - Tom Shaw of Massachusetts and the former


suffragan Barbara Harris to co-consecrate with James Jelinck at his own


consecration.



Griswold threw down the gauntlet and told the ANGLICAN COMMUNION DROP DEAD! He told Associated Press that he openly supported Gene Robinsons


confirmation because Episcopalians in New Hampshire had overwhelmingly


chosen him in their local election and had the right to make that


choice. Griswold also argued that Scripture does not condemn same-sex


relationships, a position conservatives vehemently reject.



In the UK The Church Society, an evangelical organization within the


Church of England, called for the expulsion of the Episcopal Church


from the Anglican Communion for promoting a non-celibate homosexual to


the episcopate. In a letter addressed to the Primates of the Anglican


Communion dated September 15, the Church Society argued that the


recent action by the Episcopal Church of the USA in agreeing to


consecrate Gene Robinson is not an isolated incident but it serves to


show how that body acting corporately has set themselves outside


historic Christianity. The denomination has become a (North American)


sect.



Then news came that CANON JOHN PETERSON of the Anglican Consultative


Council was attempting to manipulate the agenda of the primates


October meeting in order to nullify conservative outcomes. Some


classified documents were inadvertently given to Dr. Paul Zahl, an


American orthodox Dean and a member of the International Anglican


Doctrinal and Theological Commission [IADTC]. This deep-sixed


Peterson control of the Primates meeting.




AMIA BISHOP John Rodgers said that two overlapping jurisdictions in the


ECUSA were untenable. There must be one Anglican Province in the


country-region in fellowship with Canterbury, not two the concept of


two overlapping jurisdictions is untenable for several reasons. For the


Archbishop of Canterbury to remain in communion with those bishops,


clergy and congregations that endorse the election and consecration of


Bishop elect Robinson would morally and doctrinally corrupt the


Anglican Communion itself.




SYDNEY ARCHBISHOP Peter Jensen weighed in suggesting that the American


arm of the worldwide church be expelled. He said time was running out


for the Archbishop of Canterbury to act on homosexual issues dividing


the worldwide Anglican Church.




A GATHERING OF NEARLY 3,000 ORTHODOX ESPICOPALIANS IN DALLAS still shell-shocked by GC2003 decision to confirm Robinson, heard the Rev. David Roseberry issue a clarion call, we are finally free and we know what is at stake. God still does change lives and that we declare. We declared our support at General Convention on August 5 and we stood up on the votes and we asked for the intervention of the Primates.




At Dallas, A PLACE TO STAND - A CALL TO ACTION was distributed to the


attendees. The statement upheld the Great Commission, repudiated the


actions of General Convention, repented for its part in the sins of the


Episcopal Church, and called upon the Episcopal Church to repent and to


reverse the unbiblical actions of the General Convention, stating its


objection to the consecration of Canon Robinson as a bishop of the


Church.




FORWARD IN FAITH LEADER Fr. David Moyer called for full cooperation


with Evangelical and Charismatic wings of the ECUSA, to achieve the


goal of cleansing the Church and working towards renewal and reform.




THE POPE SENT PRAYERS TO THE AAC meeting through Cardinal Ratzinger,


bypassing  815 and a rebuke to Frank Griswold, a pointed at that did


not go unnoticed by revisionists. A wrenching split in the fabric of


the Communion if the Primates did not act it was predicted. Courage


breeds courage, said the Bishop of Pittsburgh to the 2,700 attendees.




THE PRIMATES also said they would intervene in the Episcopal Church


then they met in Lambeth, and move to throw Frank Griswold and the


Episcopal Church out of the Anglican Communion.




THE LAMBETH CONFERENCE




Some 37 Primates were ready to act as they gathered in Lambeth. And act


they did. What emerged was the most honest, most difficult meeting


any could recall reflected Robert Duncan with reports of the power of


prayer and the falling of the Holy Spirit reported. Questions of law


and constitutionality nearly derailed the meeting. The Communions


center and its power shifted to the Global South. The Primates Meeting


replaced the Anglican Consultative Council as the Communion’s key


decision-making body (between Lambeth Conferences). Rowan Williams


achieved presidency on his terms and his turf and the imits of


Anglican diversity were clearly delineated. Scripture and Lambeth


Conference teaching were determinative and Provinces could break


communion with errant partners and Ecumenical and Inter-Faith


considerations mattered profoundly. It was also a time to organize


provincial responses to schism.




Midway into their deliberations an unscripted press conference was held


on the grounds of Lambeth Palace. Irish Archbishop Robin Eames told


reporters that the Primates were telling their stories representing the


cultural differences, while saying that there was a tremendous anxiety


to maintain the Anglican Communion on a basis of collegiality,


cooperation and the common faith.




The UK movement REFORM urged the Primates to stand firm.



A Statement at the conclusion of the meeting by the Primates said the


actions of New Westminster to authorize a Public Rite of Blessing for


those in committed same sex relationships, and by the 74th General


Convention of the Episcopal Church (USA) to confirm the election of a


priest in a committed same sex relationship to the office and work of a


Bishop, threatened the unity of the Communion as well as relationships


with other parts of Christ Church, as well as mission and witness,


and relations with other faiths, in a world already confused in areas


of sexuality, morality and theology, and polarize Christian opinion.




The Primates of the Communion were givenenhanced responsibility


entrusted to them by successive Lambeth Conferences, and they re-


affirmed their common understanding of the centrality and authority of


Scripture in determining the basis of their faith.



In a unanimously-agreed statement, they strongly reaffirmed the global


Anglican teaching on homosexuality, with the Primates concluding that


if this consecration proceeds, we recognize that we have reached a


crucial and critical point in the life of the Anglican Communion. They


said that the future of the Communion itself would, therefore, be put


in jeopardy. If Robinson is made a bishop, the statement said, his


ministry would not be recognized by most of the Anglican world, with


many provinces likely to consider themselves out of communion with the


U.S. Episcopal Church (ECUSA).




AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES SAW VICTORY AT LAMBETH with Frank Griswold being told in clear and blunt terms that if appeared at, and/or consecrated


Gene Robinson he would be declared anathema by the Archbishop of


Canterbury and in time expelled from the Anglican Communion. Lines


hardened and there was no way back for the leader of the theologically


liberal Episcopal Church if he went through with the consecration of


Gene Robinson.




In an effort to put the best spin on the Lambeth meeting the Diocese of


New Hampshire issued a statement saying, we echo their affirmation


that what we hold in common is much greater than that which divides us


in proclaiming Good News to the world. We commend their resolve to


follow the 1998 Lambeth resolution calling for the Church tolisten to


the experience of homosexual persons, and ... to assure them that they


are loved by God and that all baptized, believing and faithful persons,


regardless of sexual orientation, are full members of the Body of


Christ.



But the Coptic Orthodox Church at its Annual Clergy convention presided


by His Holiness Pope Shenouda III, Pope of Alexandria and Patriarch of


the See of St. Mark formally condemned Homosexuality, the Ordination of


Homosexuals and Same-Sex Marriages.




In the meantime The AMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCIL prepared for a


realignment. We are beginning the process of realignment of


Anglicanism in North America that the Primates laid out for us in their



statement. Our course is getting clearer each week, said the Rev.


Canon David Anderson, AAC President. With the Archbishop of


Canterbury encouragement, the AAC Bishops Committee on Adequate


Episcopal Oversight is coordinating requests for oversight, said Canon


Anderson. We are proceeding deliberately and carefully to insure that


this oversight is available sooner rather than later. The AAC Board


also moved forward with the establishment of a Network of Confessing


Dioceses and Parishes in the Episcopal Church.




In a separate note Archbishop Drexel Gomez who attended the


Extraordinary emergency meeting of primates said the appointment of


Robinson was  unacceptable by an overwhelming majority of Primates,


and said dreadful consequences of sodomy to a state, and on the extent


to which this abominable vice may be secretly carried on and spread, we


cannot, on the principles of sound policy, consider the punishment as


too severe.



ROBINSON CONSECRATED




Amidst much hoopla Robinson was consecrated on an ice hockey rink in


Durham, NH Nov. 2, 2003.  First came the objectors. The Rev. Dr. Earle


Fox launched into a statement about the high percentage of homosexuals


who engage in anal and oral sex. After he began to talk about rimming


he was interrupted by Griswold who asked him to get to the main point


of his speech. Fox then talked about the physical and spiritual


consequences of homosexual behavior and that God would never bless such


a behavior. Next up was a woman parishioner from the parish of St.


Mark Episcopal Church in Ashland, NH. Meredith Harwood read a


prepared statement that said to press forward with this consecration


was to turn one back on almighty God, and the clear teaching that


sexual activity outside of marriage was wrong. Inclusivity without


transformation is not the gospel of Jesus Christ, she said. Finally


the Suffragan Bishop of Albany, David Bena stood up and read a


statement on behalf of 38 ECUSA and Canadian bishops, and said the


chosen lifestyle of Robinson was incompatible with Scripture and that


to proceed with this consecration stands at odds with that teaching.



Krister Stendahl read a letter from the Archbishop of Uppsala commending the occasion. In his speech Robinson spoke of those who find themselves on the margins and who have not known the year of the Lord’s favor.




Following the objections a group of dissenters left the ice rink and attended an alternate Eucharist at Durham Evangelical Free Church.



Worldwide outrage reached fervor pitch.



The AMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCIL protested the consecration and twenty


Anglican primates who opposed the ordination of homosexuals announced


that they would split from their North American counterparts. The


primates made public their decision to break away from the Episcopal


Church of the USA.



THIRTY-EIGHT BISHOPS signed a letter of objection to the consecration.


Their statement read in part said, In keeping with our consecration


pledge to guard the faith, we, the undersigned bishops are registering


our objection to the consecration of a person whose chosen lifestyle


is incompatible with Scripture and the teaching of this church. We


endorse the assessment of the Primates of the Communion who wrote that


as a result of this consecration...The future of the Communion itself


will be put in jeopardy. In this case, the ministry of this one bishop


will not be recognised by most of the Anglican world, and many


provinces are likely to consider themselves to be out of Communion with


the Episcopal Church (USA).




A number of Primates of the Global South responded to the consecration


of Gene Robinson saying, It is with profound sadness and pain that we


have arrived at this moment in the history of the Anglican Communion.


We are appalled that the authorities within the Episcopal Church USA


(ECUSA) have ignored the heartfelt plea of the Communion not to proceed


with the scheduled consecration of Canon Gene Robinson. They have


ignored the clear and strong warning of its detrimental consequences


for the unity of the Communion...




CENTRAL FLORIDA BISHOP JOHN W. HOWE blasted Griswold saying he should  resign.  My heart is breaking over yesterday consecration of the


Bishop Coadjutor of New Hampshire, he wrote. By virtue of this


action, we in the Episcopal Church, USA have ignored the counsel of the


Archbishop of Canterbury, the Meeting of the Anglican Primates (as


recently as two and a half weeks ago, which you yourself signed!), the


Anglican Communion Council, the most recent Lambeth Conference (in


1998), and the Theology Committee of the House of Bishops.




IN THE DIOCESE OF NEW JERSEY a pregnant lesbian priest who runs


Diocesan happenings, a sort of Cursillo for youth was exposed by


Virtuosity with both bishops approving her position, seeing nothing


contrary to Scripture or even common sense, to allow this awful role


model to run a youth program.




WHILE IN CANADA the New Westminster Bishop came down hard on seven


orthodox parish priests and said he was bringing them up on charges.


The bully of Vancouver, Michael Ingham, officially charged all seven


clergy with disobedience.



AND IN THE DIOCESE OF PUERTO RICO, The Rev. David Alvarez was


inhibited, one of three orthodox priests including a university


professor for standing up to the bishop there, a bishop who supported


ECUSA same-sex blessings and the ordination of an avowed sodomite.




MEANWHILE ECUSA LEADERS WRESTLED OVER the meaning of Episcopal oversight. The first view, that of adequate episcopal oversight, was


being pushed by the American Anglican Council with the blessing of the


Archbishop of Canterbury and the Primates. ECUSA Presiding Bishop had


a different take on what that means. He argued for alternative


Episcopal care, a different notion altogether. What the orthodox


wanted was a flying bishop arrangement not unlike that in the Church of


England. The AAC created an application process for congregations


seeking adequate episcopal oversight.



Recent Posts

See All
FORMER CANADIAN PRIMATE PRESENT

Dear editor,     Hopefully the omission of Archbishop Ted Scott participation in the blessing of the civil marriage of deacons Alison...

 
 
 

Bình luận


ABOUT US

In 1995 he formed VIRTUEONLINE an Episcopal/Anglican Online News Service for orthodox Anglicans worldwide reaching nearly 4 million readers in 204 countries.

CONTACT

570 Twin Lakes Rd.,
P.O. Box 111
Shohola, PA 18458

virtuedavid20@gmail.com

SUBSCRIBE FOR EMAILS

Thanks for submitting!

©2024 by Virtue Online.
Designed & development by Experyans

  • Facebook
bottom of page