top of page

ECUSA: BISHOPS MEET AMID UNPRECEDENTED TENSION OVER GAY BISHOP


By RICHARD N. OSTLING Associated Press


3/22/2004


The Episcopal Church's first openly gay bishop weathered a firestorm of controversy on his way to being consecrated, but with some colleagues still refusing to accept him, the tension has hardly been quelled.


On Friday, New Hampshire's V. Gene Robinson was to take part in his first meeting as part of the denomination's hierarchy, a gathering aimed at easing the strain.


The bishops begin the closed-door meeting in Navasota, Texas, 60 miles northwest of Houston, to focus on "reconciliation" within the Episcopal Church and the international Anglican Communion of which it's a part. It is not a legislative meeting and no major policy decisions are expected, Episcopal headquarters in New York City said Wednesday.


Robinson is attending his first meeting as part of a hierarchy in which 41 percent of bishops who head dioceses voted against his consecration and 28 of the bishops have refused to recognize him as a colleague.


The bishops will discuss the current flashpoint, how to handle conservative parishes that don't want to quit the Episcopal Church but cannot accept the authority of local bishops who favor gay clergy.


The proposed remedy is to provide dissenting parishes with special conservative bishops from outside their dioceses. At an emergency summit last October, world Anglicanism's top leaders urged the American church to grant dissenters "adequate provision for episcopal oversight."


The U.S. church leader, Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold, and his Council of Advice then proposed a plan allowing outside bishops to work with conservative parishes - though only with approval from the local bishop as required by church law, allowing for appeals to regional bodies in case of disagreements.


Conservatives have rejected that. They don't want the local bishops to keep their veto power and claim liberals control the regional bodies that would hear appeals.


Griswold will present a rewritten plan at Navasota. Conservative leaders complain that they weren't consulted, and bishops weren't given the text to study in advance. Griswold repeated Monday that any plan must honor local bishops' powers under existing church law.


The leading conservative bishop is Robert Duncan of Pittsburgh, moderator of a "network" formed in January to unite Episcopal dioceses and parishes that insist upon the traditional Christian teaching against same-sex relationships.


Duncan said some conservative bishops are boycotting the Navasota meeting, some will participate fully and some - like himself - will stay offsite and attend only sessions treating the church fracture, Duncan said the church must "come to its senses" and help conservatives because "the present course is a suicidal course, or at least a fratricidal course."


Matters escalated last Sunday when five Episcopal bishops led a rebel confirmation service in Akron, Ohio congregations that spurned local Bishop J. Clark Grew II, a Robinson supporter.


Maurice Benitez, retired bishop of the Texas Diocese and spokesman for the five bishops, said if the hierarchy produces an "acceptable plan" for visiting bishops, "these kinds of measures may no longer be necessary." The implication: If not, there will be further violations.


Duncan said that if the Navasota meeting doesn't heed conservative appeals there will be "continuing chaos," not only Akron-type protests but congregations leaving the Episcopal Church.


Griswold's Council of Advice said the five bishops broke church law, since Grew did not approve the confirmations, and appealed for unity against forces that "seek to sow the seeds of division."


Grew said the Akron service might have been an attempt to "manipulate" the Navasota meeting while Griswold suggested the event was intended to "co-opt the bishops' agenda."


BRAZIL: PRIMATE ESCORIATES FELLOW BISHOP FOR OHIO ACTION


A Letter from the Primate of Brazil to the Most Revd Frank Griswold


March 22, 2004 (ACNS) PORTO ALEGRE—


The Most Revd Frank Griswold Presiding Bishop of The ECUSA Episcopal Church Centre 815 Second Avenue New York 10017, NY. United States of America


My Dear Brother, It was with surprise, sadness and concern that we received the news about the participation - without permission from the diocesan bishop of Ohio - of the Brazilian Bishop Robinson Cavalcanti, diocesan Bishop of Recife of the Episcopal Anglican Church of Brazil, in a confirmation service of 110 people in the state of Ohio, together with five retired bishops of ECUSA, as his participation has been stated in the press "as illustrating international support for the measures."


We want to express to your Grace our strong disapproval of this action taken by this bishop, the Right Revd Cavalcanti, who, apart from showing himself through this gesture to be both impolite and disrespectful, has violated the constitution and the canons of ECUSA, by performing an Episcopal and sacramental act in the Diocese of Ohio without the permission from the bishop of that Diocese.


With regard to the above-referenced act and also with reference to any others he may have participated in during his presence in the USA, Bishop Cavalcanti was neither an official nor a sanctioned representative of the Episcopal Anglican Church of Brazil. His participation in all and any events while in the USA was a purely personal initiative and not in any way as an envoy from our Brazilian province.


He did not and would never have obtained permission for such action; furthermore, at no stage were we informed as to his intentions with regards to such a visit. Within our Brazilian province, such an act constitutes a blatant violation of our constitution and canons, in the most basic context of the traditions of the Church.


As one of the Primates who attended the Primates` meeting of October 15th and 16th, 2003, I can also state that the fact of some bishops abrogating for themselves the right to perform sacramental and Episcopal acts, without permission from the diocesan bishop, and at the same time proclaiming such acts to be in accordance with the mandate of the Archbishop of Canterbury and with the Primates, is neither true nor correct.


The declaration arising from this meeting states that all provision for Episcopal oversight of "dissident minorities" is a matter to be resolved by the province in question and, as such, restates that "whilst we reaffirm the teaching of successive Lambeth Conferences that bishops must respect the autonomy and territorial integrity of dioceses and provinces other than their own, we call on the provinces concerned to make adequate provision for Episcopal oversight of dissenting minorities within their own area of pastoral care in consultation with the Archbishop of Canterbury on behalf of the Primates."


Thus, on behalf of the Bishops' Chamber, of the clergy and of the people of the Province of the Episcopal Anglican Church of Brazil, I would like to offer to your Grace our most sincere apologies for such a disrespectful and impolite act as done by one of our bishops.


Similarly, I would like to reaffirm that in no way do we agree with nor would we sanction such a canonical violation, done in total disrespect for the autonomy of your province and for the Diocese of Ohio.


Further, I take this opportunity to inform you that this matter will be taken up and examined in the next meeting of the Bishops' Chamber, 22-23 March, 2004.


I also wish to reaffirm our respect for the decisions of the General Convention in Minneapolis, thus recognising the autonomy of our brothers and sisters of ECUSA, who, in their own cultural and ecclesiastical context, and through regular and democratic canonical process, confirmed the election of Bishop Gene Robinson.


Last but not least, I also wish to reaffirm our communion and companionship with our sister Church ECUSA. We believe that the family we belong to, the Family of the Anglican Communion around the world, has to be an instrument of God's love for the world and that means, that in seeking to hold together as a Communion, we have to be seeking to serve that purpose and no other.


So, it is my belief that by attempting to work through differences within our family we may come to a better perception of the calling of our mission. We reaffirm that we are Partners in Mission with ECUSA.


Be assured of our prayers for your well-being, for the pastoral ministry that God has entrusted to you, and also for all the clergy and people of ECUSA. "We know that all things work together for good for those who love God, who are called according to his purpose." Romans 8.28


With every good wish and blessing, Most Revd Orlando Santos de Oliveira Primate of the Province of the Episcopal Anglican Church of Brazil.

Recent Posts

See All
LETTER FROM ARCHBISHOP ROBIN EAMES - APRIL 29, 2004

To: The Primates and Moderators of the Anglican Communion From: Archbishop Robin Eames, Chairman of the Lambeth Commission 29 April 2004 Dear colleagues, As Chairman of the Lambeth Commission establis

 
 
 

Comments


ABOUT US

In 1995 he formed VIRTUEONLINE an Episcopal/Anglican Online News Service for orthodox Anglicans worldwide reaching nearly 4 million readers in 204 countries.

CONTACT

570 Twin Lakes Rd.,
P.O. Box 111
Shohola, PA 18458

virtuedavid20@gmail.com

SUBSCRIBE FOR EMAILS

Thanks for submitting!

©2024 by Virtue Online.
Designed & development by Experyans

  • Facebook
bottom of page