DOES THE ANGLICAN COMMUNION HAVE A FUTURE?

By David W. Virtue

CHARLESTON, SC--There is a need for mechanisms of order and discipline in the Anglican Communion if it is to survive, says the president of the Anglican Communion Institute, Dr. Christopher Seitz.

Addressing several hundred attendees at a conference here, Seitz, Professor of Divinity at the University of St Andrews, Scotland said, one can actually hear the timbers of our Communion boat creak, and there seems to be little sign that the winds are calming. The Communion has been hit by a tsunami, and we are salvaging what we can and hoping things have not gone beyond the possibility of repair.

At virtually every level of our life, we have been affected by the events of the past six months. The stress and strain has left no one-lay person, clergy, theologian-untouched, he said.

We are heeled way over, shipping water, the seas are rough, we are working hard on deck, there is much activity, much worry, much concern, some people have been washed off deck, some have jumped into lifeboats, the boat is stretched to the limit, and there is concern about sustainability: of the boat and of ourselves.

Seitz told the conferees of theologians, Episcopal clergy and concerned laity, that any talk of a federation must be rejected. We are a Communion, unlike the Lutheran World Federation, which consists of independent national churches. Anglicanism has found its life and mission in a genuine Communion of accountability and interdependence. Within the US, we have tried to emphasize this with the language for a network now forming: Anglican Communion Dioceses and Parishes.

If some leaders in ECUSA wish to be a local American denomination, one among many others claiming new truth in a New World setting, we at ACI have maintained a different vision: an Anglican Church true to its Communion past and present as the Body of Christ, and not an assemblage of body parts with different goals and different Masters.

Seitz expressed puzzlement, though not surprise, at the failure of the post New Hampshire episcopalianism to declare itself no longer bound by the promises and responsibilities of Communion life.

With all the talk of fresh insight and conviction and new Holy Spirit teaching, why does this talk not find its logical end-point: a kind of declaration of independence from Communion promises and common life? Since its actions indicate a wish to be independent, logic would demand that talk of a genuine Communion-a single body in Christ, as He is our single and only Lord-cease.  And indeed, after New Hampshire, it is hard to imagine that next years Primates meeting, or the Lambeth Conference in five years, will look as they once did, ever again.

We are facing an unprecedented moment in the life of the Anglican Communion. At no point in its long history can a direct analogy be found which would help us determine what kind of response is required. We are at a moment of reckoning with fateful consequences for the identity of Anglicanism as an international Communion of Churches.

Seitz expressed concern that the Communion would devolve into a federation of independent national bodies internally divided and denominated according to individual preferences and wishes.

Dr. Philip Turner, former Yale theologian and Episcopal priest asked, will we divide into two bodies - one composed in large measure of white people from the United Kingdom, North America, Australia and New Zealand and another composed in large measure of people of color from the Global South?

...