jQuery Slider

You are here

Women Bishops: Has The Church ‘Locally Adapted’ Become A Bridge Too Far?

Women Bishops: Has The Church ‘Locally Adapted’ Become A Bridge Too Far?

Fr. Dale Matson
http://sanjoaquinsoundings.blogspot.com/
July 21, 2014

St. Gregory The Great sent the monk Augustine to the British Isles as a missionary in 597. Augustine became the first Archbishop of Canterbury. Gregory was eager but cautious in introducing the Gospel to England and thus he included the leeway allowing Augustine to ”locally adapt” church customs in England.

“Gregory showed great wisdom and insight in his management of the mission. He and Augustine kept close contact with each other; they worked as a team. Through their correspondences, he exhorted Augustine to contextualize Catholic rituals, making the faith as relevant as possible to the nation of Angli. In this, he showed that he cared more for the heart of the religion than for its strict ritual, and removed as many barriers from the Gospel as he could.”
http://cms.intervarsity.org/mx/item/4333/download/ (James Choung)

The concept of local adaption is an important component in Anglican DNA and was used in the Lambeth Quadrilateral (1888) as one of the distinguishing characteristics of Anglicanism.

"As inherent parts of this sacred deposit, and therefore as essential to the restoration of unity among the divided branches of Christendom, we account the following, to wit:

1) The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the revealed Word of God.

2) The Nicene Creed as the sufficient statement of the Christian Faith.

3) The two Sacraments,-- Baptism and the Supper of the Lord,-- ministered with unfailing use of Christ's words of institution and of the elements ordained by Him.

4) The Historic Episcopate,locally adapted in the methods of its administration to the varying needs of the nations and peoples called of God into the unity of His Church."

*Note this is included in the new ACNA Catechism on Page 11.

Perhaps each Archbishop of Canterbury has seen himself as the steward of local adaptation. Once King Henry the Eighth declared the church in England to be the Church of England. Archbishop Thomas Cranmer helped locally adapt the structure and worship of the Church of England with his Book of Common Prayer (1549) in the vernacular in response to the king as the head of the church.

Archbishop Justin Welby said that the measure adopted Monday would mark “…the start of a great adventure of seeking mutual flourishing while still, in some cases, disagreeing. The challenge for us will be for the church to model good disagreement and to continue to demonstrate love for those who disagree on theological grounds.”

Archbishop Welby, an advocate for female bishops inserted his customary boilerplate jargon into his response to the approval of women bishops in the Church of England. Mutual flourishing along with his other favorite “Human Flourishing” is the new gospel of the Archbishop. http://sanjoaquinsoundings.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-error-of-human-flourishing-as.html

There is no such thing as “good disagreement” which if possible, is even more of an oxymoron than “Jumbo Shrimp”. Notice how he also states, “The challenge will be for the church to continue to demonstrate love for those who disagree on theological grounds” as if those who disagree on theological grounds were no longer a part of the church.

This is not really breaking new ground. Archbishop George Carey supported the ordination of women and helped shepherd in the first women priests in the Church of England. The women were ordained during his tenure in 1992.

Here is an excerpt from an immediate reaction to the ordination of women bishops from the Russian Orthodox Church. “The decision to ordain women, which the Church of England took in 1992, damaged the relationships between our Churches, and the introduction of female bishops has eliminated even a theoretical possibility for the Orthodox to recognize the existence of apostolic succession in the Anglican hierarchy.” Notice the fact that we are no longer recognized as being in Apostolic succession which pretty much makes the locally adapted part a moot point.

My question would be, “When is local adaptation simply acquiescence to contemporary culture?” The context for the church is the Kingdom of God and the spreading of the Gospel. Local adaptation has transcended and usurped Scripture, Tradition and the church universal. The bell cannot be un-rung for the Church of England.

END

Subscribe
Get a bi-weekly summary of Anglican news from around the world.
comments powered by Disqus
Trinity School for Ministry
Go To Top