Planned Parenthood, President Obama, and "Too Many" Abortions
By Gerald McDermott and Carol Swain
February 15, 2009
David Nova, a regional Planned Parenthood vice president, recently told the Roanoke Times there are "too many abortions." President Obama has said the same thing. This is odd, when you think about it. If the fetus is simply a blob of tissue, what would be wrong with a lot of abortions? Of course, if these fetuses are really little human beings, then we could understand their worry.
But then why has Planned Parenthood fought so hard against parental notification bills, conscience protection bills, and Medicaid funding restrictions which, according to Professor Michael New and others, have been partly responsible for the dramatic reduction in abortions in the 1990s and since? And why does Planned Parenthood support the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), which President Obama vows to sign if it comes to his desk? It would strike down all federal and state abortion restrictions, which would undoubtedly increase the number of abortions in this country. Tom McClusky reports that in each of the seven states with FOCA-like laws, "abortion rates have increased, while the national rate has decreased."
Planned Parenthood applauded President Obama's recent revocation of the "Mexico City Policy," the result of which will send our tax dollars to fund abortions overseas. This has been our new president's most unpopular decision. It's also puzzling, because Obama himself has said he wants fewer abortions.
Nova claims "preventive reproductive health care and education" would reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thus abortions. Yet these are the same things Planned Parenthood has been saying and doing for four decades. They have been offering birth control, sex education and abortions all this time, but in many ways things have gotten only worse. Sexually transmitted diseases are way up, abortions in the black community tragically have skyrocketed, and, as Nova himself says, "teen births are rising."
Therefore we are further puzzled by Nova's request for our tax dollars to fund more of this in Virginia. Readers may be surprised to learn that Planned Parenthood nationally has plenty of money and taxpayers are contributing a large part of it. According to its own 2006-07 annual report, Planned Parenthood took in more than a billion dollars, and boasted a surplus of $80 million. One-third of its income--$336 million-came from government subsidies. Its president received about $1 million in compensation. Why pay more of our own money for practices that don't work and some of which involve what most Americans consider to be immoral?
Nova cited a Johns Hopkins study as proof that abstinence education doesn't work. But this research focused on a very small 1996 sampling of teens (289) who took a pledge but did not receive abstinence education. In contrast, sociologist Stan Weed produced in 2007 a comprehensive survey of more than 100 studies in 30 states studying more than 400,000 adolescents. Dr. Weed concluded that abstinence education programs-as opposed to simply a pledge program which the Johns Hopkins researcher studied-on average delayed the first sexual encounter by over two years, which meant fewer sexual partners and lower pregnancy and STD rates. Teens in these programs had fewer abortions and were more likely to finish high school, go to college, and have fulfilling lives.
Finally, Nova says repeatedly that he and Planned Parenthood want to prevent "unintended" pregnancies. Notice the implication-Roanoke Times readers who were not "intended" by their parents would be better off never to have been born. Perhaps this is the greatest puzzle of the abortion debate: the assumption that we can decide which lives are worth living. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the German martyr who fought Nazism, said the greatest damage to human integrity comes when we destroy innocent life by deciding it is not worth living. "Even the most wretched life," he said, "is worth living before God."
----Gerald McDermott is the Jordan-Trexler Professor of Religion at Roanoke College, and Carol Swain is Professor of Political Science and Law at Vanderbilt University.
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| webb2k | Posted: 2009/2/16 0:07 Updated: 2009/2/16 0:07 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/23 From: MISSOURAH!!! Posts: 103 |
I am convinced that the bodies from these abortions are used for some product -- pharmaceuticals perhaps? I can't prove it, but I am certain that the industry, and I mean INDUSTRY, is profiting somehow.
What did the Lord say about Molech? Peace and Blessings! |
| badcat | Posted: 2009/2/18 6:01 Updated: 2009/2/18 6:01 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/9/27 From: olympic peninsula Posts: 175 |
Webb, can you say 'stem cell'? The brain tissue is especially valuable. Some Swede a few years ago invented a device to scramble it 'in the shell' then siphon it out into a reservoir. Western Medicine has become hideously amoral and the principalities are just loving it.
|
| AllanP | Posted: 2009/2/18 19:49 Updated: 2009/2/18 19:51 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/3/28 From: Posts: 135 |
The arguments of the child killers in support of their murderous ways are both disgusting and pathetic.
If the fetus is just another part of a woman's body, than why treat in any differently? No-one can go into a hospital and demand that their hand be amputated and have the taxpayer pay for it! Oh, but the fetus is different. Darn right it is different! The fetus has a DNA that is different than the mother's. The fetus is the only thing within a woman's body that has the ability to grow into something more than what it currently is. At some point the fetus will even be able to survive outside of the mother's body. This, and so many other facts, make the fetus something great. That something is a gift from God. I am hard pressed to think of anything more wrong than the willful destruction of such a gift. Finally, because abortion is murder, than all those who participate in it or support it must be excommunicated! |
| shytech74 | Posted: 2009/2/19 18:31 Updated: 2009/2/19 18:31 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/4/23 From: Ontario Canada Posts: 1054 |
"Western Medicine has become hideously amoral and the principalities are just loving it."
quote by badcat ------------------------------------- You are absolutely correct. If we do allow a baby to come to term and be born, then we immediately pump it full of vaccines... My God, what a hellish world we have when it is controlled by Corporatism - anything to sell pharmaceuticals, to sell weapns, to sell toxic waste, at the cost of human life and health. Watch this video clip: http://brainguardmd.com/ Incidentally, this man is the national leader of the political party I belong to. www.canadianactionparty.ca |
| leader1111 | Posted: 2009/2/20 0:51 Updated: 2009/2/20 0:54 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/19 From: Hobe Sound, Florida Posts: 237 |
President Obama thinks there are too many abortions. Don't tell me this rubbish. Then why support abortions any time, any where, on demand. Under Pres. Obama babies can be killed at any time. Look at this beautiful picture and make up your own mind. It's picture number four and called the Best "Human" picture.
http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=383a4d67e7&view=att&th=11f91113d99e6897&attid=0.1&disp=vgp&zw |














