Register now for more content and features!!    Login   Home | News | FAQ | eBooks | Weblinks | Gallery | Contact Us
News Topics
Special Reports
Columnists
VirtueOnline
Search
VOL Sponsors

North American
Anglican


The Orthodox Journal for Anglicans in North America

Historical, Theological, Practical

39Articles.com



Land of a
Thousand Hills
Coffee


Drink Coffee
Do Good



Sustainable Ministry: Coffee, Community, Social Justice

DrinkCoffee
DoGood.com



Orthodox Anglican
Priest's Manual



Hardcover and Electronic copies available

OrthoChap.com


Contact Us for advertising rates.

News : TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked For Exposing Militant Islam
Posted by David Virtue on 2009/2/15 8:00:00 (3666 reads)

TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL: British Evangelical Author Attacked For Exposing Militant Islam

February 15, 2009

Background

Were you shocked by this headline? Perhaps you were, especially if you are familiar with that gracious Christian leader Patrick Sookhdeo. Perhaps as shocked as I was to see a headline on blogistan.co.uk reading "Review of rotten book by the Sookhdevil" - quite an attention-grabber.

Indigo Jo, the blogger who coined that headline, is certainly good with words. He is also a convert to Islam, known as Yusuf, original name Matthew Smith. A self-confessed truck driver with a degree in politics who lives with his parents in Surrey, Matthew Smith has become not just a Muslim but an Islamist. This he makes clear on his website where he describes himself as pro-madhhab Le. pro-sharia.

His blog reviews a review of Patrick Sookhdeo's respected work "Global Jihad: The future in the face of militant Islam". The book was published back in 2007, which raises the question of why Matthew Smith a.k.a Yusuf a.k.a Indigo Jo should on 31 January 2009 post a damning comment about it on his blog. Conveniently he gives us the answer: "Ben White of Fulcrum, a website for evangelical Anglican Christians, has drawn my attention to a review he has written of Patrick Sookhdeo's 2007 book Global Jihad."

The plot thickens. Why should an evangelical Christian go out of his way to point out to a radical Muslim a negative review of another evangelical Christian's book?

As a matter of fact this kind of betrayal of one Christian by another to a Muslim is not as uncommon as you might think, especially if - as in this case - the betrayer is white and the betrayed is not. Let me give you another example.

In December 2005, Pastor Daniel Scot was speaking in Australia to Christians about Islam. Scot, originally from Pakistan, had moved to Australia because of persecution in his home country, where his bold defence of the Christian faith had led to him being accused under Pakistan's "blasphemy law". In Victoria, Australia, he had fallen foul of the new state law on religious "vilification", in a case brought by the Islamic Council of Victoria. (Incidentally, Gary Bouma, a white Anglican priest, gave evidence for ICV against Scot because he did not like charismatic Christians.) White Christians who attended the 2005 meeting - which was not in Victoria - took Scot's material to the Islamic Council of Victoria to get him into still more trouble. Imagine the distress this betrayal caused him.

Maybe you are tempted to comment, "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me. Why such a fuss?" The fuss is because, in the context of Islam, words can all too easily lead to broken bones - or worse. Daniel Scot received death threats in Pakistan and was threatened by an armed mob on one occasion. Another time he would have been thrown off a balcony by an angry mob of students, except that a professor intervened just in time to save him.

The Bishop of Rochester, Rt Rev. Michael Nazir AIi, of Pakistani origins, now has to have a body guard, not just for himself but also for his Englishborn wife and their two sons. His forthright comments on Islam in Britain have led to death threats from the British Muslim community, threats which the police take very seriously.

Furthermore, good ministries are being undermined, and might even be destroyed. Ben White's review of "Global Jihad" soon appeared on the Church Mission Society, and also on the website of Richard Sudworth, one of their missionaries, who urged people to read the review and see what really underpins the ministry of Barnabas Fund.,Barnabas Fund, headed up by Patrick Sookhdeo, is an aid agency sending practical help to persecuted Christians. If Sudworth's comment damages its work, he will have reduced the support available for faithful Christians living courageously in hostile contexts. But of course, they are mostly non-white and many of them are converts, so their wellbeing is perhaps of little interest to him.

What could be of more interest to him is the evangelical culture of betrayal which might, just might, affect him too one day. Suppose the habit of betrayal spreads, and the betrayers are themselves betrayed.

What on earth is going on in the evangelical camp right now? Not only have they turned on each other, but they have even enlisted the aid of a radical Muslim in their attempts to destroy one of their own. If, as alleged, White directly contacted Indigo Jo, was he acting on his own initiative? Or is White a naivecat's paw, who was manipulated into taking this outrageous action? Whoever was behind it, did they hope, expect or know that Indigo Jo would literally demonise their fellow- Christian with the epithet "Sookhdevil"?

But putting these possible future scenarios aside, what on earth is going on in the evangelical camp right now? Not only have they turned on each other, but they have even enlisted the aid of a radical Muslim in their attempts to destroy one of their own. Is this a series of unconnected events which coincidentally revolve around the same few people and organisations? Or is there a plan? Was young Ben White officially representing Fulcrum when he contacted Indigo Jo? Or is White a na.ivecat`s paw, who was manipulated into taking this outrageous action?

Is he linked through All Nations Christian College to CRIB? Was he chosen for his known hatred of Israel, bordering on anti-Semitism? From anti-Israel to pro-Palestinian to pro-Muslim to anti-convert is not a difficult path to follow. Whoever was behind it, did they hope, expect or know that Indigo Jo would literally demonise their fellow- Christian with the epithet "Sookhdevil"?

----I am white Western missionary. I am writing this because of my concern about what I see happening, in particular the attacks on and betrayal of Christian converts from Islam and other non-white Christians by white Western Christians. I have been in full-time Christian ministry, including evangelism amongst Muslims, for many years. I am concerned at the growing divide between missionaries and converts from Islam. February 2009

Social Bookmarking
Bookmark to: Favit Bookmark to: Digg Bookmark to: Del.icio.us Bookmark to: Facebook Bookmark to: Reddit Bookmark to: StumbleUpon Bookmark to: Furl Bookmark to: Google Bookmark to: Yahoo Bookmark to: Technorati Information        
Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Poster Thread
dturk
Posted: 2009/2/15 17:48  Updated: 2009/2/15 17:48
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/5/26
From:
Posts: 404
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
Wake up world. Whenever any group resorts to threats or tries to stop free speech, they are up to no good. The Islamists have proven that they are totally untrustworthy.
Cennydd
Posted: 2009/2/15 17:57  Updated: 2009/2/15 17:59
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/10/30
From: Los Banos, CA, Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin
Posts: 6684
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
It's time for Her Majesty's Government to thoroughly investigate the Islamists in Britain, and expose them and their tactics....and round them all up and deport every last one of them forthwith.

This to include everyone from civic leaders to day laborers....and that includes university students, too!

Britons, you need to take your land back, because your very survival as a civilization is at stake!

Cennydd
AMIABill
Posted: 2009/2/16 0:57  Updated: 2009/2/16 0:57
Quite a regular
Joined: 2007/10/9
From:
Posts: 58
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
David:
I certainly hope that this indictment is either over-inflated or limited to a handful of individuals. If not, British Evangelicalism is in deep, deep trouble. For those of us on the American side, is FULCRUM one of those a-la N.T.Wright "Open Evangelcal" groups? Is it known for its opposition to "Reform" and other conservative Evangelical organizations? Does it have one foot in the Evanglical camp and one foot in the liberal camp? Is it known to be anti-GAFCON or anti-Israel? If the answer to these questions is yes, expect C of E Evangelicals to rupture in two sooner rather than later.

AMIABill
daveball
Posted: 2009/2/16 9:58  Updated: 2009/2/16 9:58
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/12/18
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2281
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
Wake up world. Whenever any group resorts to threats or tries to stop free speech, they are up to no good.

True. Kind of like what you see from the current administration in Washington.
daveball
Posted: 2009/2/16 10:03  Updated: 2009/2/16 10:03
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/12/18
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2281
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
Islam is aggressive and evil. Unless Christianity becomes much more aggresive in combating this evil, Christianity will be consumed. The "politically correct" world being foist upon us is not the way to combat Islam.

It is apparently not a problem when Islam shouts out that Christianity is bad. What is the situation if Christianity even whispers that Islam is evil? Condemnation! Cries of intolerance! Hate crime prosecution!

Wake up or learn to say Allah il Allah.
mattv
Posted: 2009/2/19 8:18  Updated: 2009/2/19 8:18
Just popping in
Joined: 2009/2/17
From:
Posts: 2
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
This is my first post here having signed up after reading about your Sookhdeo post.

I have to confess that I am saddened by the aggressive line you're taking on this topic. Your article is riddled with errors and is unfortunately angry in tone. As someone who knows all of the people mentioned in the article, I feel that I should graciously suggest that you check your facts rather more carefully in future. Nobody at All Nations or anywhere else has ever criticised Patrick by name or sought to discredit him or his ministry. All sensible Christians in the UK (including all the people you mentioned by name) welcome the work that the Barnabas Fund does. We often disagree with Patrick's analysis on Islam, but we would hope that we can do so graciously and in a Christian spirit.

As for the comments on this piece, particularly the one which says "Unless Christianity becomes much more aggresive in combating this evil, Christianity will be consumed", I scarcely know what to say. Do you think that Jesus, the Prince of Peace, the man who said "blessed are the peacemakers", would have this opinion? Do you really think that Christianity will be consumed by Islam, when Jesus has said "The gates of hell will not prevail against it"?

What we need in this country, and elsewhere, is NOT aggression. That road leads to the Crusades. What we need is more radical, dangerous, irrational love, and more Christians being loving and gracious to Muslims. I humbly suggest that this approach is more likely to bear the resemblance of Christ than the aggression and fear which you seek to whip up.
PhelimMc
Posted: 2009/2/19 15:42  Updated: 2009/2/19 15:42
Just popping in
Joined: 2009/2/19
From:
Posts: 2
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
mattv - having been to the websites of Richard Sudworth and seen a release fom Barnabas your comment about sensible Christians welcoming the work of Barnabas Fund rings hollow. If so why encourage people to discover the real underpinnings of Baranabas Fund's work?

Soodhkeo and Mark Gabriel from the States are both converts from Islam. Both speak about three levels of Jihad - that there is Jihad through diplomacy. Sam Soloman, Bishop Nazir Ali say very much the same thing. Yet Christian's seem to be attacking them and Maranatha for speaking the truth. Amongst my good friends are Muslims who would agree with Soodhkeo's viewpoint.

I agree that love is the weapon we must use but Jesus called us to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves. Soodhkeo, Soloman, the Bishop of Rochester and others are calling us to be wise as serpents. So why are they whipping up agression and fear by equipping us to see hidden agendas? Especially when Ben White - who did the main review refered to - has said that he is not an evangelical?
mattv
Posted: 2009/2/20 6:49  Updated: 2009/2/20 6:49
Just popping in
Joined: 2009/2/17
From:
Posts: 2
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
Hi PhelimMc, and thanks for the response.

When I said that we welcome the work of the Barnabas Fund, I meant it. Christians were almost totally unaware of the issue of persecution, until they raised it. Now we have Christians supporting persecuted Christians, and praying for them. This is excellent.

However, many of us disagree with Patrick's analysis of Islam (namely, that it is intrinsically violent and that Muslims all lie to protect themselves). The problem is that he can't distinguish between a valid difference of opinion and a personal attack. The criticisms that have sparked this nonsense are all perfectly valid - Ben White's review was totally fair, in my opinion - but Patrick interpreted them as a personal attack.

I have heard Sam speak and it utterly revolted me. He spent an hour and a half talking about how Muslims are trying to take over the UK and are all bent on beheading us. Not once did he mention the importance of love, or the relevance of the Great Commission. Is this the best response that Christians can make? I don't see it as helping us to be "wise as serpents"; I see it as giving us reasons to be just as poisonous of serpents, and nearly as dangerous. Surely as followers of the Prince of Peace we can do better than that.
PhelimMc
Posted: 2009/2/20 8:21  Updated: 2009/2/20 8:21
Just popping in
Joined: 2009/2/19
From:
Posts: 2
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
Hi Mattv

I have read Patrick's book and when I read Ben White's review I thought he was talking about another book. I do not know Soodkheo but by rereading Global Jihad I felt that White was attacking Soodkheo not reviewing the book. White's book is not an academic review, it is childish criticism, as he misquotes the book and attempts to manipulate Soodkheo's words.

I have had the priviledge of working with a number of Muslims over the years, and have one as a work colleague now. My current colleague agrees with Soodhkeo's view and says that the West's view of Jihad as just armed response is Islam's greatest ally in bringing Shira law into the UK and Europe. He is not a militant Muslim yet he is speaking the same language as Soodkheo and Soloman. I was first told this by a Muslim of Pakistani descent in Manchester over ten years ago.

I also from a UK paper (the Independent I think) where a Plaistinian child, in the light of the recent activity there, speaks of wanting to do Jihad through intelletual debate. Read a lot of stuff coming out via the Memri site from Middle Eastern newspapers and television about how Muslims need to hide aspects of Islam to convince the West of their peaceful intentions and only then to show the truth of Islam and both Soodkheo and Soloman's views are not as revolting as you think.

As someone once said the Truth hurts more than a Lie. If this is the case I will carry on supporting Soodkheo and Soloman and, as I have done, stop supporting Fulcrum.

As Marantatha, another group who speak out about the Islamicisation of the UK, would say we do not battle against flesh and blood but we must speak the truth. If some people see that speaking the truth is being a venomous serpent so be it - I take strength that a prophet is with out honour in his home town (until it is too late).
UKUSER
Posted: 2009/2/20 16:03  Updated: 2009/2/20 16:07
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/7/21
From: United Kingdom
Posts: 241
 Re: TALK OF THE SOOKHDEVIL:Evangelical Anglican Attacked ...
I'm not surprised that Fulcrum is involved in this dirty business. In the UK, they are regarded as a 'Trojan Horse' for the liberal establishment. Their so-called 'open evangelicalism' is open to anything except the truth or such values as decency and honesty. Bishop Tom Wright presides over this sorry outfit. His sole contribution to recent debates has been to snipe at Anglicans who have made some kind of stand for the truth. Fulcrum can justly be regarded as a fulcrum of Anglican Evangelical apostasy. I heartily despise both its hypocrisy and what it stands for. Thanks to the likes of Tom Wright, I no longer regard the Anglican office of Bishop as having any validity whatsoever.
Support VOL

Please support VirtueOnline with a tax deductible gift.


Your support of our ministry keeps the world informed with the truth!


   


VOL Sponsors



Global Anglican Theological Institute

Multi-Lingual Bible & Theological Education



GlobalAnglican.org
sponsored by VOL







St. Michael
the Archangel

Philadelphia, PA

http://www.anglicanphiladelphia.org

Traditional
Anglo-Catholic
Worship
for PA, NJ, DE

Worship at 8 & 10am
215 Belmont Ave
Bala Cynwyd, PA
215-247-1092
Anglican
Philadelphia.org





Contact Us for
advertising rates.