HERNDON, VA: Canadian Theologian J.I. Packer Talks Up Future of Anglicanism
Covenant Dead on Arrival. New NA Province a Must. Williams Must Resign.
Future of Anglican Communion in Doubt
By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
9/29/2008
You would think that British-born theologian Dr. J. I. Packer - a man with impeccable Anglican credentials, multiple accolades, numerous books and now in his 82nd year -- might just be permitted to kick back and listen to Jazz music (his favorite), write more theological tomes and exempt himself from the current culture wars in the Anglican Communion.
Not a chance.
The distinguished octogenarian Canadian, Anglican, theologian, teacher, author and priest, has experienced the culture wars first hand. At the age of 81 and with more than 60 years as a priest in the Church of England and the Anglican Church of Canada, he experienced the shock of being defrocked by a revisionist Canadian Anglican bishop and then re-ordained by an orthodox Anglican Archbishop from another jurisdiction.
A lesser man might have had heart failure and shuffled off to glory.
But this thoughtful, quiet, seemingly under-stated theologian has a rod of iron spine and a clarity of vision and purpose about the gospel and church that shines forth from the pages of his books, from his life, from the pulpit and from within the sometimes messy confines of a press conference.
In Virginia, this past weekend, he was the keynote speaker at the Anglican District of Virginia (ADV) ( a division of CANA's) second annual Synod Council at the Church of the Epiphany in Herndon. Packer ripped a proposed covenant that would include "heretics" as an unworkable solution to holding the Anglican Communion together, saying that a North American Anglican Province was absolutely necessary for orthodox Anglicans in the US and Canada.
He hinted darkly that the GAFCON Primates might be forced to form their own Anglican Communion, free of the heresies of Western Anglicanism sunk in the mire of Tillichian Christianity foisted on the West by the German-American theologian and Christian existentialist philosopher.
"Because of liberalism, the sort of liberalism that came into the church from the end of the 19th century into the 20th century, it was never challenged and corrected. If there is a weakness in historic Anglicanism it is a willingness to tolerate the intolerable and that has betrayed us. Tillich's position affected all the seminaries of North America. This is where we are today in the West."
In the pulpit and at a later press conference where VOL posed a number of questions, Packer put into perspective what he saw as the current state of affairs in the Anglican Communion today.
Question: What hope do you have in a Covenant as a solution to holding the Anglican Communion together?
Packer: I don't think it can be the solution as the matter is being handled from Canterbury, because the Covenant is being handled to include and provide for the heretics in the church and de facto what is coming out of the hopper is being drafted to keep everyone inside who are also outside of historic diocesan structures.
The liberals are maintaining positions not tolerable and need to be explicitly excluded in any future working basis. I am not thrilled at the process going on. From Rowan Williams' standpoint nothing else needs to be done. His position sympathizes with the heretics and he doesn't want appear to be dragging his feet. He doesn't want to see Anglicanism restructured or redefined so as to leave those people out. He encourages the covenant process, at the same time the covenant will be exclusive of some.
(Historically) what happened in the 19th century is that bishops and the archbishops of Canterbury began a pattern of tolerance with a standard of tolerance that became (over time) a virulent liberalism because of the teaching of (German-American) theologian Paul Tillich. Episcopal leadership has been ruined from that day to this.
This has been going on in TEC and CofE for the last half century and is something like suicide. It is a process of ensuring that the life is drained out of the church and the leaders do this by encouraging various forms of liberalism. This does not communicate life and it doesn't build up congregations, it only weakens and shrinks them.
Question: Are you in favor of a new Anglican province in North America?
Packer: Yes, I am and I hope that the movement that is underway is a non-geographic one both for the U.S. and Canada. I believe it is going to succeed. We must make it succeed. I hope it would be recognized by the Archbishop of Canterbury. It will certainly be recognized by the majority of primates of the Anglican Communion.
(CANA missionary Bishop Martyn Minns said he hopes the Communion will recognize it. He said it would function like a province and work coherently and be recognized by GAFCON groups. Asked about a time line, Minns said a proposal would be submitted to the GAFCON Primates Council by the end of this year. It will be a short time line. By early next year recognition will come, he said.)
Question: What is your opinion of the leadership of the Archbishop of Canterbury? Do you have any regrets calling for the resignation of Rowan Williams?
Packer: The Archbishop of Canterbury is an honest man and by being honest he has positioned himself over a barrel, and as long as he is the ABC he will be over the barrel. Is it comfortable? No. Is it helpful for the world Anglican fellowship? Again, no.
Yes, he has admitted before becoming ABC that he said and did things, which sanctioned gay unions. When he become ABC, he said as far as the gospel is concerned, he was going to fulfill the role of the champion of Anglican order and the Lambeth Conference.
The '98 conference declared itself categorically against homosexual unions and homosexual activity and anonymous marriage and the ABC said he must and will uphold the standard. But his moral credibility is shot. The gay way is ruinous in all sorts of ways. Anglicans have rightly to be concerned about this.
Personally he is not in a position to being himself or to encourage or bring discipline on bishops with such a point of view that he embraces himself. So he is over a barrel. It seems to me the best way out that the Holy Scripture recommends as wisdom is that following this Lambeth, he should be finished as archbishop and move back into the academic world. He is a fine scholar. There are many institutions that would be glad to have him on their faculties.
Question (from VOL): Do you see GAFCON as a possible alternative Anglican Communion?
Packer: Speaking very cautiously, the answer is yes. One possibility will be that the orthodox Anglican communities will be organized in a fellowship which has GAFCON roots and has as its center the leadership of the Primates.
The churches of the old West are unable to enter that circle. We cannot walk together with heretics. These folk in the northern western world are heretics. What that means for the Church of England and provinces deeply infected with a lesser form of liberalism and what that means for the churches of North America is beyond me to guess. There is a sorting out going on and we shall all come out of the hopper better.
Question: What is your assessment of the Charismatic Movement?
Packer: I have assessed the Charismatic Movement and taking and looking at it piece by piece, the Charismatics really believe in exuberant praise. Praising the Lord is a central aspect of worship. It is a delightful activity, a powerful activity and the effect is charismatic. Am I cool to the charismatic movement? Oh no, I am not cool to the Charismatic Movement. I am very grateful for it, because it brought praise and giving glory to God. It is a group, corporate and needed in our personal lives. We need the Charismatic Movement to come and show us that.
Asked by VOL if this was a paradigm shift in his thinking from his Reformed theology, Packer said no. "This is not a paradigm shift. We (evangelicals) are not in the habit of giving glory to God. Charismatics help us emphasize the glory of God.
Question: Do you have any words of encouragement for the Diocese of Pittsburgh?
Packer: I have three words, VOTE FOR IT. Pittsburgh will be No. 3 diocese to leave The Episcopal Church. I hope they do come under Archbishop of the Southern Cone into a world of sunshine and peace.
Question: Presiding Bishop Jefferts Schori says there are no goats, all are saved. Do you believe that?
Packer: Bishops should be guided by the teaching of the Bible. The Bible standard is that the human condition is lost and that we are without Christ. The Bible recognizes that there are those who are not saved. All of that determines our view. Faith in Christ is the path of salvation and without faith in Christ we are not in position to say anyone is saved.
DURING the course of his sermon, Dr. Packer said the following things that VOL believes are quotable and usable quotes:
"Our calling is be faithful and energetic in our walking and keep on keeping on...it is a life of steady walking..."
"We are walking home to heaven. We walk in company in, with, and under the Lord Jesus Christ..."
"The life of communion with God and with Christ is the path of holiness..."
"There are three questions we must ask when we read Scripture: "What does this tell me about God? What does it tell me about life's ups and downs, and what does this to say to me about my life today."
"Theology is for everyone...it is thinking together under the authority of scripture. It means we have access to God and we believe in the sovereignty of the living God."
"The glory of the Trinity as the divine team - Father Son and Holy Spirit...we praise the Trinity. "
"The sinfulness of sin cannot be over-emphasized. The world is convinced that the individual is basically good. We need to hammer away that we are sinners and the gospel is Good News for bad people."
"The Gospel stresses the sinfulness of sin and stresses the glory of Jesus Christ. He is loving, serving, ministering and going to the cross to bear our sins away."
"Don't be afraid of penal substitution...it is Christ in our place..."
"Penal means he endures the penalty of our sin. He takes the sort of separation from God that impenitent sinners face. He bears this.
"The lord lays on him the iniquity of us all..."
"Our guilt goes to him. His righteousness...and we start over with God...our sins are forgiven...our past is blotted out..."
"Stress the graciousness of his salvation...the supernaturalness of his church of being born again.
"Stress that God moves to draw near to us..."
"The hope of heaven should be stressed..."
"Stress the glory of God in creation, providence and grace."
"Glory is God's self disclosure."
"Praise to God for the praiseworthiness He deserves...God is adorable let us praise His name."
Packer said that catechizing had fallen out of use in teaching children. Kids can learn the basics of the faith from the age of 3. They can learn what their heavenly father can do.
"Christian doctrine is not a series of abstractions...."
"We become life-long teachers and life-long learners..."
"You never come to the end of the realities that Scripture presents to us. Keep learning and keep on applying what you learn to life."
ON BISHOPS: "When bishops are good value, they are very good value. When bishops become heretical, then parallel jurisdictions become favorable. As tensions increase for faithful Anglican congregations, they must come under helpful new bishops."
"Bishops are overseers of pastoral ministry in stated areas. That used to be the Anglican way. Episcopal oversight has had to be set up geographically alongside of Anglican pastoral structures in the same geographic area because of the present situation."
ON METHODS OF TEACHING:
"Monologue is basic."
"Q & A is the form of catechetical answer."
ON THE PRESENT SITUATION:
"I have re-aligned. CANA is part of the realignment. We are being overseen by Southern part of South America..."
"God is using the present situation to squeeze the liberal leadership out of the Anglican Communion..."
"We need to restore a sense of mission in a truly pagan world..."
"We are to be counter cultural..."
"We are called to live as the Early Church did...in the world we won't be understood."
"We are new creatures in Christ..."
"I see this as a temporary phase until Anglicanism restored to its former glory."
END
VIRTUEONLINE in syndication with Anglican-TV will now air videos of stories where possible to allow readers both to read and see for themselves what leaders of the Anglican Communion have to say on the issues of the day. Working together VOL and Anglican-TV will bring you the best and the latest news.
VOL has posted three videos of Dr. Packer speaking to the Synod Council of the Anglican District of Virginia: They include his keynote address, Q&A, and a press conference as soon as they become available.
David W. Virtue, President, VirtueOnline
Kevin Kallsen, Founder, Anglican-TV
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| seminarian | Posted: 2008/9/29 19:01 Updated: 2008/9/29 19:01 |
Quite a regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/10/6 From: Posts: 48 |
For those interested in mp3 files of Dr. Packer's address and Question and Answer session, the files are now posted on the Anglican District of Virginia website (www.anglicandistrictofvirginia.org) under the Resources tab in the audio and video file category on page 2.
|
| FrankV | Posted: 2008/9/29 20:06 Updated: 2008/9/29 20:06 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/1/5 From: Colorado Springs, CO Posts: 302 |
Those in the church who opposed Dr. Packer should hang their heads in shame and pray for God's mercy.
|
| Cennydd | Posted: 2008/9/29 21:32 Updated: 2008/9/29 21:32 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/10/30 From: Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin Posts: 7352 |
Dr Packer's words should be sent to every mission and parish in the Church as an inclusion in a Pastoral Letter from the diocesan bishop.
Unfortunately, this will never happen in either The Episcopal Church or the Anglican Church of Canada, but I would encourage every orthodox Anglican bishop to send it to his people. I especially encourage everyone who reads his remarks to see to it that their priest or vicar receives it. Cennydd |
| Holst | Posted: 2008/9/30 1:28 Updated: 2008/9/30 1:28 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/9/28 From: Posts: 7 |
This article touches on a subject that I, and obviously everyone here, is thinking a lot about these days. And that is, what is the future of the Anglican Communion, and specifically the future of the many groups and individuals that have broken away from the historical communion?
And what I have begun to think is that it is possible that the breakaway groups will eventually unify. They will become unified under one banner, one clerical leadership, and one set of theological teachings and traditions. In essence, they will be unified in the same way that the Anglican Church was centuries ago when it was the Church Of England all over the world. But these days, the Church is only loosely unified through a once per decade meeting in England. And at this meeting nothing is decided which is binding and mandatory for all provinces in the Communion. We were once like the RC Church, now we're just a bunch of different Churches that share some common traditions and obviously a common heritage. But its been centuries since one Bishop had jurisdiction over all Anglican churches throughout the world. The new organization that will be an amalgamation of all the breakaway churches might unify in the manner that I am talking about. This will allow it to have ever increasing influence and appeal. It will speak with one, unified voice to the 'other' Anglican Communion and to the whole world. And I think everyone will be surprised to see how many people will want to become part of it. Look at the complete and utter mess that TEC has become. Some other provinces are not too far behind. The only questions that I have are: will something like this happen? And if it does, how will it be received by those who remain in the historical communion? Will they all still be able to meet at Lambeth? |
| Ikerliker | Posted: 2008/9/30 3:10 Updated: 2008/9/30 3:10 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/1/16 From: PA Posts: 2052 |
Rowan needs to go. It's time to look beyond Canterbury. The North American province needs to happen yesterday!
Looking forward to October 4th! |
| marinemama | Posted: 2008/9/30 6:10 Updated: 2008/9/30 6:10 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/9/25 From: Albany, NY Diocese Posts: 133 |
The contrast between Rowan and Bishop Soto couldn't be sharper. Bishop Soto is a courageous defender of the Faith who is not afraid to speak the truth and defend the Faith. I was born and raised Roman Catholic, and was deeply distressed by much that was going on in the RC Church, particularly the sexual abuse scandal and slso the failure of many American bishops in particular to speak out on moral issues of our day. (Also, the music and the preaching are generally pretty bad.
) My husband and I were Lutherans for a time, then Episcopalians, then returned to Rome for 19 years, and three years ago we found a really wonderful Episcopal parish where we have been going since then. We soon learned that TEC is a travesty of a church, and that the problem exists in other parts of the Anglican Communion as well. This was very discouraging. We did find comfort in the fact that there are so many orthodox Anglicans who are determined to defend and uphold the Faith. And now I'm reading more and more often about RC bishops who are doing the same. I'm beginning to think that orthodox RC's and orthodox Anglicans have very much in common indeed, and I believe that it is very possible that reunion with Rome may not be as unlikely as it once was. Liberal Catholics and liberal Anglicans also have more in common with each other than they do with their own denominations. Maybe they can unite in a new, even more depraved TEC while the rest of us get down to the business of trying to know and serve the Lord. |
| Holst | Posted: 2008/9/30 12:59 Updated: 2008/9/30 12:59 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/9/28 From: Posts: 7 |
Marinemama, I would never think that a reunion with Rome is our of the question. But I think that a more likely scenario in the near future is seeing some Orthodox Anglicans becoming Roman Catholics. Now, I know that as Anglicans we sort of swear we'll never do that. But its a logical direction for many Anglicans who feel there own Church has betrayed them. They would probably be willing to put up with the things they do not like about the RC Church in exchange for the benefits and blessings they would receive. The other thing I can envision, under the scenario I outlined above, is a new, revived, realigned, Anglican Communion, all as one, somehow coalescing with Rome in the future.
|
| Cennydd | Posted: 2008/9/30 15:23 Updated: 2008/9/30 15:23 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/10/30 From: Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin Posts: 7352 |
Holst, I have to agree with you. I believe that we orthodox Anglicans who have fled TEC will eventually....one way or another....reunite spiritually with Rome; thereby fulfilling the plea "that we all may be one."
Both sides of that eventual spiritual reunion have their faults and foibles, and there can be no denying that, but the sooner we learn to tolerate each other's points of view and appreciate each other's feelings, the sooner this will come about. We are, after all, CHRIST'S Church, and not our own. It is HE who saves us, and not we ourselves. Let HIS will, and not OURS, be done! Cennydd |
| Holst | Posted: 2008/9/30 17:47 Updated: 2008/9/30 17:47 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/9/28 From: Posts: 7 |
Indeed, the new Communion, the new Church, could be far more of a unified organization than the shell of a nominal Church that will be left behind. And don't be surprised if it begins to rapidly increase its numbers. Even many members of the historical communion will begin to dislike the watered down theology that's taken over things.
|
| jmoyers | Posted: 2008/9/30 23:19 Updated: 2008/9/30 23:20 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/12/15 From: Charleston, WV Posts: 19 |
In regards to the persecution of Dr. Packer in Canada (which was perhaps one of the most ungodly occurences... yes, I'm a Packer fan), I believe his license to officiate was pulled, but he was not defrocked. If I remember correctly, he was not canonically resident there, but just functioning under a license to officiate.
At any rate, no orthodox Anglican province would have ever "re-ordained" him. Perhaps that part of the article should be corrected as it exhibits real error in sacramental theology. When one is "defrocked," or more correctly speaking, deposed, their "ecclesiastical driver's license" is taken away, but they are still ordained. (This metaphor comes from Fr. Michael McKinnon and others who taught circa 2002 in the Diocese of Quincy School for Ministry). Ordination imparts, along with Baptism and Confirmation, a "character indelibis" upon the soul and therefore is unrepeatable. It's an important distinction to make. No one "re-ordained" Dr. Packer... reinstated, yes... but that is totally different. Reordination is theological error. At any rate, God bless Dr. Packer (so saith the quasi liberal who thinks that Packer is a blessing to the Anglican Communion). |
| jfmckenna | Posted: 2008/10/1 1:04 Updated: 2008/10/1 1:04 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/4 From: Posts: 717 |
Dr. Packer says we are to be countercultural. The pro-homosexualist faction still sees itself as countercultural because it is moving against traditional family structures. However this mode of false and easy tolerance has now become the norm in the media, the arts, and in society generally. The countercultural position, therefore, is indeed the orthodox position represented ably by Dr. Packer.
|
| Sagamore | Posted: 2008/10/1 4:39 Updated: 2008/10/1 4:39 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/9/10 From: Posts: 137 |
"However this mode of false and easy tolerance has now become the norm in the media, the arts, and in society generally. The countercultural position, therefore, is indeed the orthodox position represented ably by Dr. Packer."
Which more or less brings the Church back to right about where She was when She first began to move out into the pagan Empire all those many centuries ago. |













) My husband and I were Lutherans for a time, then Episcopalians, then returned to Rome for 19 years, and three years ago we found a really wonderful Episcopal parish where we have been going since then. We soon learned that TEC is a travesty of a church, and that the problem exists in other parts of the Anglican Communion as well. This was very discouraging. We did find comfort in the fact that there are so many orthodox Anglicans who are determined to defend and uphold the Faith. And now I'm reading more and more often about RC bishops who are doing the same. I'm beginning to think that orthodox RC's and orthodox Anglicans have very much in common indeed, and I believe that it is very possible that reunion with Rome may not be as unlikely as it once was. Liberal Catholics and liberal Anglicans also have more in common with each other than they do with their own denominations. Maybe they can unite in a new, even more depraved TEC while the rest of us get down to the business of trying to know and serve the Lord.


