Register now for more content and features!!    Login   Home | News | FAQ | eBooks | Weblinks | Gallery | Contact Us
News Topics
Special Reports
Columnists
VirtueOnline
Search
VOL Sponsors

North American
Anglican


The Orthodox Journal for Anglicans in North America

Historical, Theological, Practical

39Articles.com



Land of a
Thousand Hills
Coffee


Drink Coffee
Do Good



Sustainable Ministry: Coffee, Community, Social Justice

DrinkCoffee
DoGood.com



Orthodox Anglican
Priest's Manual



Hardcover and Electronic copies available

OrthoChap.com


Contact Us for advertising rates.

Exclusives : LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
Posted by David Virtue on 2008/9/23 12:50:00 (4059 reads)

LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
Making the canons mean what you want them to mean

Commentary

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
9/23/2008

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean-neither more nor less."

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master-that's all."

Last week in Salt Lake City at the HOB meeting, Mrs. Katharine Jefferts Schori, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church proved to be the "master" of the language of the canons of The Episcopal Church. She deposed a godly, faithful, Bible-believing bishop by castrating a canon and using it to filibuster it through the House of Bishops.She declared Bishop Robert Duncan guilty first and then held a vote to confirm what she had already decided. "Sentence first, verdict afterwards" said the queen in Alice in Wonderland. Jefferts Schori deftly skirted Roberts Rules of Order, but as Alice might have said, "I can make the canons mean whatever I want them to mean." Indeed.

She succeeded by a two to one vote even though the canons require a majority of all bishops entitled to vote (as Mrs. Jefferts Schori conceded in signing the "deposition") not merely a majority of those present. A majority of the bishops (150) were absent, only 127 were present. Within two hours, the Presiding Bishop claimed he was no longer the Bishop of Pittsburgh. Consider the irony of this situation.

This House of Bishops refuses to bring to trial one John Shelby Spong, former Bishop of Newark, for numerous heresies over the years culminating in his 12 Theses which is an open and public denial of most of the Christian Faith.

They would not, nor could not, in conscience because most of the bishops believe in Spong's "theology" and are unable to uphold 'the faith once for all delivered to the saints'. No presentment charges would ever hold up because the Episcopal Church has no "core doctrine" it can uphold or believe in. The Righter "trial" was evidence enough of that.

So consider the multiple statements of at least two Presiding Bishops' as well as resolutions passed at one General Convention after another that have chipped away at the faith. There is now no apparent turning back.

In 1979, Presiding Bishop Edmond Browning declared that he would "not obey or enforce the church's official traditional teaching on sexuality." The rot was already setting in. As Bishop Thad Barnum noted in his book, Never Silent, "His declared rebellion became the driving force behind the church's new morality."

Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold in 1997 stated publicly, without blushing and without shame, that the Episcopal Church was intentionally, and by God's decree, living in contradiction to the words of the Bible. "Broadly speaking, the Episcopal Church is in conflict with Scripture. The only way to justify it is to say, well, Jesus talks about the Spirit guiding the church and guiding believers and bringing to their awareness things they cannot deal with yet...this has led the church to in effect contradict the words of the Gospel," said Griswold.

Resolutions rejecting the church's received teaching on sexuality have flowed thick and fast over the years, enabled by the growing number of LGBT priests and activist lay persons all led by the indomitable first sodomite emeritus Dr. Louie Crew.

At GC2006 with Resolution A161, the church rejected any hint of a "moratorium" on ordaining more gay bishops or blessing gay marriages. Instead, they passed Resolution B033, which promised "to exercise restraint" for anyone "whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church." The resolution meant nothing. Within weeks, the Diocese of Newark put forward a gay candidate for bishop.

Resolution D058 asked that Episcopalians believe that through Christ alone, "the only name by which any person may be saved." It never made it out of committee, being vetoed by a 70 percent majority.

When Katharine Jefferts Schori, the successor to Frank Griswold, activist supporter of Gene Robinson and a campaigner for same-sex blessings was asked where she stood on the issues, she said, "Homosexuals were created by God," but when pressed about how blatantly she contradicted Scripture on Salvation, she replied: "I think, (it is) to put God in an awfully small box". Pressed on her views about the Bible she said, "The Bible was written in a very different historical context by people asking different questions." For her, the Bible no longer matters. When the church passed resolution D039 stating that sex outside of marriage was now acceptable to the church, clergy and senior leaders failed to inform their dioceses and congregations so great was the sin and even greater would have been the backlash by mostly sexually conservative Episcopalians had they known.

To this day, congregations are being kept in the dark about the resolutions passed at general conventions and sexual behaviors committed by priests and bishops. What would thousands of laity think and do if they knew that Jefferts Schori said she knew of a number of cases where homogenital bishops are living in same-sex partnered relationships (she wouldn't say who)? It is not just Gene Robinson, the Bishop of New Hampshire. He is carrying the freight for those who won't declare themselves in public. How many laity would be shocked to know that their own bishop was secretly gay with a partner?

Is it any wonder that when Quincy Bishop Keith Ackerman introduced Resolution B001 asking that General Convention affirm "Holy Scripture as the foundation of authority in our Church" they could not do so. If they had, they would have had to reject Gene Robinson's consecration, so the sovereign authority of Scripture went out the window. The Lambeth Resolution 1:10, affirming heterosexual marriage and rejecting homosexuality, was deep-sixed.

At that moment, it was over for The Episcopal Church. As the tables slowly turned on faithful Episcopalians, they became more and more the brunt of angry, aggrieved and vicious pansexualists who made it clear that the church was going in their direction and to hell with you.

Now we are seeing the spectacle of truth turned so entirely on its head that orthodox believers are now being told that their leaving TEC is nothing more than a pure power play for properties. Jesus said nothing about homosexuality and women's ordination is not enough of an issue to leave (or destroy) the Episcopal Church over. All our desires are mixed. We are all sinners. Why split the church over a couple of issues? Get over it.

"Then too one does question bishops and priests who try to gain power among their flocks like demagogues by promulgating simple, single-issue concepts like their objection to the ordination of women or their disapproval of homosexual practices," wrote an activist layman in the Diocese of Pittsburgh who is ready with his priest, the Rev. Harold Lewis, to pounce on diocesan properties once the diocese declares itself under the Province of the Southern Cone.

Liberal activists tell us that the people taking over this diocese will be as impure and driven by mixed motives and sin as those who are leaving. That is true, but they are not denying the faith once for all delivered to the saints. Being a sinner and publicly denying the gospel are two entirely different things. Peter was a sinner who denied his Lord and repented. Judas betrayed his Lord and killed himself.

Such people don't get it.

What is happening at the very deepest level is a suborning of Scripture, the rewriting of sacred text to suit our needs. Said Charles Bennison, the inhibited Bishop of Pennsylvania, "The Church wrote the Bible and the Church can rewrite the Bible". It comes as no surprise that Bennison is a close friend of Spong. It is about the bastardization of the texts of Scripture to suit our own devices and desires; it is not about a handful of biblical texts against sodomy. It is the total rejection of Scripture as "God's word written"...of its authority over us, not we over it.

What we are seeing now is the wholesale abandonment of the historic Christian Faith by a denomination that is slowly withering and dying, even as it eulogizes and plays up social activism in the form of Millennium Development Goals to cover its deficient theology of salvation. Secular salvation is the new mantra as spiritual salvation is devalued and killed off.

The liberals and revisionists laugh at the new "vagante orthodox" who leave TEC labeling them as just schismatics who can't get their act together. They may ridicule a new Anglican Province in North America, and think GAFCON is just about a lot of disgruntled orthodox Anglicans who don't like Rowan Williams. The liberals and revisionists certainly have no fear of the Archbishop of Canterbury who they and we know is with them in heart, soul, mind and theology.

When the Episcopal Church had only to contend with those in their ranks who opposed their political agenda, they were kept busy ordering their own house. Now they are free to direct their energies outward. Just look at the damage they are now doing. They are using the Trust funds, held in sacred trust to spread the true mission of God, to eradicate parishes and dioceses that are slipping from their grasp citing "civil rights" and "hate crimes" initiatives.

Even some orthodox clergy tells us, that TEC is just another side show in the Culture Wars and we will win if we stay. That, too, is a failure to see the true spiritual condition of TEC. We are in a SPIRITUAL WAR with godly laity, priests and a number of bishops fighting for their very spiritual lives. They are paying the price with defrocking, lost properties, truncated pensions, and smaller salaries...all for the sake of the cross of Christ. "For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places," wrote the Apostle Paul.

The once clandestine takeover of The Episcopal Church is now out there for all to see. It is now a public war being played out in the media and on the Internet. It will not be covered up, spun, nor made to disappear because the "principalities and powers" would like it so.

The action of deposing Bishop Robert Duncan is a watershed, or turning point, like Stalingrad and Gettysburg were...make no mistake about it, wrote one blogger. He is right. This IS a war and it will have repercussions for all faithful Christians.

Absolute power is now in the hands of these phony Christian radicals. They have made it clear that their intention is to clean house, TEC's own version of the "Night of the Long Knives," wrote another Anglican blogger.

"For all intents and purposes, the battle for the possession of the Episcopal Church is over except for a few mopping up operations here and there. Remaining issues, such as whether or not the Diocese of San Joaquin will be able to keep their property and money in the conduct of their fighting retreat, are inconsequential. The forces that have retreated, whatever may become of them, are not coming back to retake the lost ground. The National Cathedral is lost, the University of the South is lost, and the Cathedral in Atlanta is lost, to the organized homosexuals and their allies who slugged it out in the "long march" to take over the Episcopal Church. They won completely and utterly."

He might have added the seven Episcopal seminaries, with the noted exception of two, the cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City, millions of dollars in properties, some 450 clergy, reduced income to liberal dioceses and the hemorrhaging that will continue for years to come.

The Episcopal Church has sown to the wind and it is reaping the whirlwind. The Episcopal Church with its $10 billion in assets will not save it "in that day". David Booth Beers will die rich, but he will die and he won't be able to take it with him. He will be answerable for his actions. God is never mocked, never.

Jefferts Schori and her cronies are not merely heretics and apostates; they are traitors to the cause of Christ and His gospel. They have ripped the heart of repentance right out of the gospel and now laugh and mock it.

With the flight of yet more dioceses, we are seeing the slow end of the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion as we know it. At the end of the day, the Jefferts Schori's, Rowan Williams's, et al will have only themselves to blame.

Even so come Lord Jesus.

END

Social Bookmarking
Bookmark to: Favit Bookmark to: Digg Bookmark to: Del.icio.us Bookmark to: Facebook Bookmark to: Reddit Bookmark to: StumbleUpon Bookmark to: Furl Bookmark to: Google Bookmark to: Yahoo Bookmark to: Technorati Information        
Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Poster Thread
mathman
Posted: 2008/9/23 22:13  Updated: 2008/9/23 22:13
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/5/26
From: Rockville, MD
Posts: 1064
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
Yes.
Truth is only in the eye of the beholder.
The Canons mean whatever the PB wants them to mean. Abandonment of the faith means whatever the faith is at that particular instant.
The last bridge has been crossed and burned; there is no more turning back; the schism is now an accomplished fact.
The 87 Bishops who voted in support of the PB have only themselves to blame. Their inability to stand up for something has enabled them to fall for anything!
So, alas, there are no more pieces to pick up.
daveball
Posted: 2008/9/23 22:34  Updated: 2008/9/23 22:34
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/12/18
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2377
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
As usual, David sums up the situation masterfully. The issue is not that the HOB are hypocrites and heretics, that is a given at this point, but what course of action to take and when and how.

Common Cause and Gafcon provide the basis for the way forward but there are many serious obstacles in the way. There are many which must be addressed and cannot be conveniently relagated to "adiaphora" or non-essentials.

As we move on toward our October 4 Convention in Pittsburgh:

In necessariis unitas
In non necessariis libertas
In omnia caritas
badcat
Posted: 2008/9/23 22:50  Updated: 2008/9/25 21:13
Home away from home
Joined: 2006/9/27
From: olympic peninsula
Posts: 175
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
More to the point, D-ball- CARTAGO DELENDA EST!
daveball
Posted: 2008/9/23 22:54  Updated: 2008/9/23 22:54
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/12/18
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2377
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
badcat,

Destroyed it must be. Destroyed it will be.
unitarian
Posted: 2008/9/23 23:19  Updated: 2008/9/23 23:19
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/12/31
From: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 307
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
Of course the deposition was scandalous yet it got through and of course the rot has been spreading, but hidden, as is pointed out, for at least a generation.

Let's face it. A church is a soft target. Taking over a bank or a city hall is a job, but getting control of endowments and so forth can be done almost comfortably.

I think David is too pessimistic. DO NOT DECLARE THE FIGHT LOST YET. I would argue that only now is it really beginning, as ordinary folk start wondering what has happened and what is going on.

I say this because the New Religion has scored a sort of stealth takeover of lots of things. But how will they keep those things? They are a well defined and generationally limited group that will not replace itself, will not attract followers, and cannot live entirely on dwindling endowments. Furthermore, they have alienated many who initially believed in their honesty and sincerity.

My own view is that just as they subverted the church, so they will subvert themselves. I only hope to live long enough to see the real outcome.
frcharlie
Posted: 2008/9/23 23:33  Updated: 2008/9/23 23:33
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2004/8/11
From: Central New York
Posts: 123
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
I would strongly advise the remaining Bishops(?) and other prominent clergy in TEC not to get that woman POed at them.

Charlie+
Sagamore
Posted: 2008/9/24 2:45  Updated: 2008/9/24 2:45
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2007/9/10
From:
Posts: 137
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
"To this day, congregations are being kept in the dark about the resolutions passed at general conventions and sexual behaviors committed by priests and bishops. What would thousands of laity think and do ..."


Well, to judge from my experience at my former TEC parish, they wouldn't do a thing at all. No one in the leadership at the parish was the least, little, tiny bit interested in knowing about or discussing the controversies and schisms. As clerk of the vestry, I sat in on years of vestry metings and Spong, Robinson, Schori, GAFCON, etc, was literally never even given so much as one passing sentence's worth of discussion. I finally knew I had to quit when I ran into our Senior Warden at the supermarket right after Lambeth ended and upon asking him what he thought of what happened he basically told me he had no idea at all idea what went on and couldn't care less about it.

"Whatever" seems to be the guiding principle for TEC laity. As long as the dinners, picnics, and children's pageants can go on, all's perfectly fine. Social activities are everything, religion is nothing. As long as something on two legs wearing a collar shows up on Sunday morning and performs some semblance of a liturgy, everything expected of Christians and their Church is fulfilled.
patulous
Posted: 2008/9/24 8:21  Updated: 2008/9/24 8:21
Home away from home
Joined: 2007/5/18
From:
Posts: 1778
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
I found the same experience that you have had, having been a warden and found that the majority of the vestry were hardly Christians.....the one thing I hated was to sit in a vestry meeting and listen to the profanity as if it was required language for the meeting.

A few weeks ago, I happened on to a person that claimed he was an episcopal priest and during our conversation, he told me that he thought schori was doing such a wonderful job. I asked him had he ever visited VOL, he said he didn't know about the website. I told him to visit it and get the straight skinny on what was going on in the church world.

I think we should pray for those that are still in the dark about their own church.
Ex_aedibus
Posted: 2008/9/24 10:41  Updated: 2008/9/24 11:20
Quite a regular
Joined: 2008/7/2
From: Namyangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Posts: 58
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
From my experience as a Roman Catholic, I've found that those who pride themselves on inclusivity and diversity are often least diverse and least inclusive of all. The truth of liberal tolerance is made clear for all to see.

I consider myself to be an orthodox Catholic. I pray that this is how I am seen in God's eyes. When it comes to matters such as the integrity of the Christian faith, we have a duty to resist the errors and heresies they seek to impose on us.

I simply cannot trust the liberals in my own church. They have watered down our catechesis to the point where many Catholics in the USA don't even know what they believe. Where liberalism gets you is best reflected in the houses of many religious orders in the USA today. Many of them are greying with virtually no one to replace them. Some haven't had a vocation in over a decade or more. Others are preparing for their imminent demise. The same picture plays itself out in mainland Protestant denominations throughout the country.

Yet the response of these liberals is not to seriously examine themselves. It is to agitate for even more change and even more strange things. "We didn't do enough!" "We have to do more!" Liberal Catholic dioceses, such as Weakland's Milwaukee or Mahony's Los Angeles, have few priestly vocations. The excuse that is given is, "we want quality over quantity". While the Church should indeed look for quality instead of mere quantity, I do believe that there are many good men out there who will answer the call, but who are driven away by either the situations in their respective dioceses or by vocations directors opposed to the ordination of yet one more orthodox priest.

Trusting these liberals is like trusting teenage boys with a bottle of whiskey and car keys. There is simply no room for orthodox Christians in most dioceses in the Episcopal Church.
JRoss
Posted: 2008/9/24 11:23  Updated: 2008/9/24 11:47
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/3/15
From: New Jersey
Posts: 896
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
As others have posted most of the congregations still in TEC are in denial big time. Holding all of the lay offices myself when I was there, I can attest to what other here have said.
ETaylor
Posted: 2008/9/24 12:21  Updated: 2008/9/24 12:21
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2004/1/7
From: Missouri
Posts: 105
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
Where are the lightening bolts when we need them? How LONG oh Lord!
Cennydd
Posted: 2008/9/24 13:00  Updated: 2008/9/24 13:01
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/10/30
From: Los Banos, CA, Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin
Posts: 6862
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
"Problems? WHAT problems? We don't have any 'problems' in OUR parish!" seems to be the mantra in TEC these days....and it's been that way for YEARS!

The average parishioner doesn't care a whit about his or her Church outside the four walls of their church building! I've said this repeatedly for the past five years! They are parochial....and they can't see the forest for the trees!

Most of them can't even be bothered to ask their clergy about what's happening, and even if they DO ask, they're likely to be fed a lot of pablum about how great things are!

And they call themselves Christians?

The NERVE of them!

Cennydd
borgy
Posted: 2008/9/24 14:38  Updated: 2008/9/24 14:38
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2005/12/21
From:
Posts: 115
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
Is there anyone reading David's article that actually still belongs to an Episcopal Church? If so, why?
JimMcNeely
Posted: 2008/9/24 22:58  Updated: 2008/9/24 22:58
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/4/7
From:
Posts: 699
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
TEC is the instrument, but the Loon Left are the driving force.

TEC looks like America in the end of the 1970s. Led by liberal Democrats, religious zealots took innocent Americans hostage and made a mockery of the great nation. We see the same thing in TEC as Moonbat Chane tries to destroy a Christian mission to the homeless or Dr. Jefferts-Schori attacks a faithful bishop while turning a blind eye to the myriad of bishops that persecute orthodox believers.

TEC needs a Ronald Reagan and an orthodox Senate. In eight short years America experienced tremendous renewal. In great measure this is because of powerful leadership and a commitment to communicate to the American people directly while concurrently ignoring the normal media outlets that would logjam his message.

TEC needs a Ronald Reagan - a bishop who is willing to attack and fight on substance, gathering a group of women and men willing to devote the time and energy necessary to push back the Loon Left hordes.

Will it happen? Doesn't look like it. But did Reagan seem like the answer to America's seemingly endless problems in 1980?

-Jim+
RevDarrenS
Posted: 2008/9/24 23:28  Updated: 2008/9/24 23:28
Home away from home
Joined: 2007/9/24
From: Georgia, USA
Posts: 213
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
Sounds like to me that Mrs. Schiori has no grasp of the concept of Christian doctrine and neither does she seem to care.

It is as if she wants to re-write the faith we have received from the apostles to allow just about every deviant behavior that she, and her ilk in TEC can dream up. So she will sacrifice our precious Christ again on her altar of liberal revision and political correctness.

What Spong and other revisionists don't realize when they postulate that "the Church wrote the Bible and the Church can re-write the Bible" is the fact that their utter apostasy from the true doctrine of Christ has cut them off from being a part of "the Church".

If ECUSA's viewpoints were presented at any of the great ecumenical councils (Nicaea, Chalcedon, etc...) they would be immediately deposed, drummed out of town, or perhaps even worse!

The Holy Spirit has NEVER stated anything to contradict scripture. To say that it does would be to say that God was disingenuous. History bears out that this is not the case. What is happening in ECUSA is simple, unabashed, heresy and apostasy. How many will be misled by these demonic doctrines? Katherine, Spong, Robinson, and the rest can take their place beside Nestorius, Arius, and all of the other heretics in the annals of Church history as examples of tragic error and folly. Regardless of their efforts...Christ's Church "Militant" is also the Church "Triumphant" and there will not be one falsehood that it shall not prevail against.

Rev. Friar Darren Simpson
Sagamore
Posted: 2008/9/25 3:25  Updated: 2008/9/25 3:25
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2007/9/10
From:
Posts: 137
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
"Katherine, Spong, Robinson, and the rest can take their place beside Nestorius, Arius, and all of the other heretics in the annals of Church history"


Except that Arius, Nestorius, and all the others from the past, as mistaken as they may have been, at least fervently and genuinely held that their own positions were those of scripture and tradition. None of them-not one-ever had the arrogance and insolence to come right out and admit their views were contradictory to the Bible and sacred tradition, but that they were right and scripture and tradition were wrong. Nope, it took TEC to take heresy to such an utterly unbelievable new height, or perhaps I should better say such a new low.

I'd like to say what we see in TEC right now represents heresy of a nature never witnessed before in the whole history of the Church, but I'm pretty sure a viewpoint requires some kind of actual religious conviction behind it to qualify as a heresy, whereas the situation in TEC is nothing but the soulless hijacking of a religious institution for the singular purpose of it's usefulness in furthering a leftist socio-political agenda.
otispage2
Posted: 2008/9/25 19:50  Updated: 2008/9/25 19:50
Home away from home
Joined: 2007/3/14
From:
Posts: 615
 Re: LIBERAL HYPOCRISY IN THE EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF BISHOPS
Sagamore is correct. To paint Arius and Nestorius with the same brush that indicts Schori, et al, is a disparagement that equates them with the devil. These men contributed to doctrine -- and even today there are Arians and Nestorians (like Islam) that are descendent from those ancient controversies. But none of these would sanction the lie that Sodom and Gomorrah was an incident of "hospitality" and not of the gross sexual nature that betrays the human character as stated in Romans 1:26, 27.
Support VOL

Please support VirtueOnline with a tax deductible gift.


Your support of our ministry keeps the world informed with the truth!


   

VOL Sponsors



Global Anglican Theological Institute

Multi-Lingual Bible & Theological Education



GlobalAnglican.org
sponsored by VOL







St. Michael
the Archangel

Philadelphia, PA

http://www.anglicanphiladelphia.org

Traditional
Anglo-Catholic
Worship
for PA, NJ, DE

Worship at 8 & 10am
215 Belmont Ave
Bala Cynwyd, PA
215-247-1092
Anglican
Philadelphia.org



The Diocese of Quincy (ACNA)
Standing Together
Upholding the Faith

http://www.dioceseofquincy.org

We invite biblically orthodox, traditional churches beyond our borders to join our 132 year old diocese in planting new churches.

The Very Rev. John R. Spencer
President of the Standing Committee & Vicar General

St. Francis Church
12200 N. Brentfield Dr.
Dunlap, IL 61525
(309) 688-8221

DioceseOfQuincy.org



Contact Us for
advertising rates.