Register now for more content and features!!    Login   Home | News | FAQ | eBooks | Weblinks | Gallery | Contact Us
News Topics
Special Reports
Columnists
VirtueOnline
Search
VOL Sponsors

North American
Anglican


The Orthodox Journal for Anglicans in North America

Historical, Theological, Practical

39Articles.com



Land of a
Thousand Hills
Coffee


Drink Coffee
Do Good



Sustainable Ministry: Coffee, Community, Social Justice

DrinkCoffee
DoGood.com



Orthodox Anglican
Priest's Manual



Hardcover and Electronic copies available

OrthoChap.com


Contact Us for advertising rates.

Exclusives : FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Posted by David Virtue on 2007/8/7 4:50:00 (8125 reads)

FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
8/7/2007

The Rt. Rev. Clarence C. Pope, Jr., 76, former Bishop of Ft. Worth, Texas announced this week that he is returning to the Roman Catholic Church. He is the second bishop in as many months to leave The Episcopal Church for Rome. The Rt. Rev. Dan Herzog, Bishop of Albany recently renounced his orders following his retirement and returned to the Roman Catholic Church.

This is the third time that Pope has left the Episcopal Church and gone to Rome.

Ft. Worth Bishop Jack Iker sent a notice out to the clergy of the Diocese of Fort Worth: "BISHOP CLARENCE POPE telephoned me this morning to let me know that Martha and he have returned to membership in the Roman Catholic Church, in full communion with the See of Peter.

We certainly wish them well and want to uphold them with our love and prayers at this important time in their pilgrimage. They both gave ten years of faithful service and witness here in the Diocese of Fort Worth, and we give thanks to God for their continuing friendship and ministry.

Bishop Pope wanted to assure me that he remains very attached to us and that his affection for the people of this diocese remains unchanged. Do join me in thanking God for both of these faithful Christians and praying His continued blessing upon them in the years ahead."

The Rev. Clarence Pope was received into full communion with the Catholic Church in the mid-1980s. According to a Roman Catholic priest who followed the bishop's wanderings, Bishop Pope, facing surgery, returned to the Catholic Church. This lasted a few months but again his ordination was delayed longer than he had expected and he returned to ECUSA. "This second return to the Catholic Church was kept very quiet, however; very few people seemed aware of it, and a priest on the staff of Saint Luke's in Baton Rouge adamantly maintained that the bishop and Mrs. Pope were at the altar rail there consistently every Sunday.

During that time Msgr. Graham Leonard and his wife were in the USA for a regularly scheduled assembly of Roman Catholic converts, and were guests in the home of the Popes; it was Msgr. Leonard who confirmed to a Washington-based journalist that during this second period Bishop Pope had been a Roman Catholic layman awaiting the rescript from Rome that would permit his ordination.

"At the time, he was expecting quickly to be ordained to the Catholic priesthood. This took longer than he had expected, and he had some sickness to deal with as well. Mutual friends had brought to the attention of then Presiding Bishop Ed Browning that he was not well and Browning was very solicitous, ultimately making it easy for him to return to ECUSA.

Pope then left The Episcopal Church in October 1994. He denied then that he was leaving right up until the day he left, said a source. "When he made the announcement, he said he planned to seek ordination as a Roman Catholic priest. He told us he had known for the previous two years that he would go to Rome," said Katie Sherrod, a liberal in the diocese.

The New York Times reported his 1994 announcement like this: "The 65-year-old bishop, who is married, said he had come to believe that the seat of Christian church authority had been divinely placed in Rome from the time of the Apostle Peter. He said that he had long prayed for a reunion of his church with Rome, but that possibility had foundered after the Episcopal Church, and the related Church of England, began ordaining women."

It quoted Presiding Bishop Edmond L. Browning as saying, "It saddens me that this breach has occurred. I pray that this new chapter in his life will be an occasion for grace."

Ten months later, after Pope discovered that Rome would not recognize his Episcopal orders, he returned to TEC, saying it was simply too painful to not have his orders recognized. The first time around, Bernard Cardinal Law, Archbishop of Boston, officially received Pope in a highly publicized event.

Pope was received into the Roman church at St. Mary the Virgin Catholic Church, a parish whose priest and congregation had been part of the Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth until 1991, when they all became Catholics and their priest was re-ordained as a Roman priest.

Bishop Pope allowed them to keep the church buildings. He was very sympathetic to their wish to leave, which they attributed to anger over the ordination of women, the new prayer book and fears of what new heresy The Episcopal Church might commit next.

The Times also reported on Pope's return to The Episcopal Church in 1995, quoting the parish priest's son as saying the congregation "was stunned by Bishop Pope's reversal.

'They were very dismayed,' he said. 'I think many of us feel betrayed.'"

The same Times story reported that the week Pope announced he had returned to The Episcopal Church, he publicly took communion from the hand of an Episcopal priest, saying in an interview that he had left the Catholic Church and abandoned plans to enter its priesthood.

The article quoted him as saying "he had succumbed to a 'growing unease' about his original decision. His unease, Bishop Pope said, lay in his feeling that he could not give up his status as a bishop, which he would have to do to be re-ordained as a Catholic priest. He described the rank of bishop in mystical terms, saying it was 'God-given' and not for him to surrender.

'I could not shake the image of my consecration,' he said, recalling the event at which his spiritual authority was signaled by a laying on of hands by his fellow Episcopalian bishops. 'I thought I could lay it aside. I couldn't.'

"He also said he felt a gnawing guilt at having left his role as a leader of Episcopal traditionalists, who oppose the ordination of women as priests."

Presiding Bishop Browning received him back into the Episcopal Church.

END

Social Bookmarking
Bookmark to: Favit Bookmark to: Digg Bookmark to: Del.icio.us Bookmark to: Facebook Bookmark to: Reddit Bookmark to: StumbleUpon Bookmark to: Furl Bookmark to: Google Bookmark to: Yahoo Bookmark to: Technorati Information        
Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Poster Thread
warmac9999
Posted: 2007/8/7 18:30  Updated: 2007/8/7 18:30
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/2/16
From:
Posts: 1455
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
The TEC is simply a disaster, - and a threat to Christianity as it embarks on its secular way cloaked in the appearance of a religion.
Withy 700 people leaving per week, it is simply evaporating.

The churches that continue to grow take good care of their spiritual and moral foundation. They do not always do it perfectly because humanity is imperfect, but they do try. The TEC is well beyond trying. The liberal revisionists have given up the very foundation of Christianity and they are embarking on "a new thing" totally independent of the necessity of honoring Jesus and any of his miracles.

The TEC is a propaganda organization not a spiritual one.
Romans828
Posted: 2007/8/7 18:33  Updated: 2007/8/7 18:33
Home away from home
Joined: 2006/6/27
From:
Posts: 244
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
I've never met Clarence Pope, but he sounds to me like someone who is insecure in his own salvation (although even Rome no longer claims that Anglicans will roast). I can see why people feel betrayed.

I've heard of Anglican priests (including married ones) converting to becoming Roman Catholic priests, but I'm not aware of an Anglican bishop who has become a Roman Catholic bishop. Can anyone think of a precedent?

The only similarity I can think of is Archbishop William Laud, who, circa 1640, was apparently offered a red cardinal's cap by a secret Papal envoy, which, had he accepted it, would have made him simultaneously the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury and a Roman Catholic Cardinal.
Romans828
Posted: 2007/8/7 19:12  Updated: 2007/8/7 19:42
Home away from home
Joined: 2006/6/27
From:
Posts: 244
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
BTW, about this See of Peter primacy thing...

I can see how a literalist interpretation of Matthew 16:18 could get a Roman apologist to the conclusion he wants, but I've not found Roman counter-arguments to the problems that the Petrine Primacy theology carries:

1) Peter didn't FOUND the Church in Rome -- he JOINED the Church in Rome already in progress. Paul's epistle to the Romans was probably written in the late 50's, by which time the Church of Rome was already well established. Peter's arrival would have been in the early 60's, if it happened at all.

2) Peter's presence in Rome is not validated by any primary written sources -- only oral tradition. I've heard that recent archaeological work under and near the Vatican has led to skeptiism that it's really Peter's resting place.

3) Peter did found two other churches -- in Jerusalem and Antioch. Why don't the primates of Jerusalem and Antioch carry the same claim to Petrine authority as the primate of Rome?

4) In Matthew 18:18, Jesus gives the same authority to the other apostles as he gave to Peter exactly two chapters earlier.

5) In all fairness, in 1054 the patriarch of Rome left the other four patriarchs of the Church (Constantinople, Alexandria, Jerusalem, and Antioch), not the other way around. Due to the spread of Islam in the East, by 1054 the patriarch of Rome became as secularly powerful as the other four patriarchs put together and could therefore buck the status quo of the balance of power in the church. Witness for example, the Roman addition of the Filioque to the Nicene Creed -- it's Rome that changed from historic Christianity, not the Eastern Orthodox. The fouth century Church, for example, did not view Rome as leading the Church; when Constantine moved the capital to Constantinople, he left behind a largely vacant and impotent city of Rome, filled mostly with the lower classes of Roman society that couldn't or didn't move with the capital to Constantinople. In fact, by the fifth Century, the Pope moved his seat out of Rome to Ravenna (northeast Italy), because that was the power center of fifth century Italy. It was from Ravenna that Pope Leo emerged to negotiate with Atilla the Hun to save Italy.

6) The context and gender of the nouns in Mt 16:18 makes it more likely that the "rock" is the theological claim that Jesus is the Christ; the "rock" is not Peter. (Greek genders in "Petros" vs "Petra").

Does anyone know where there is an authoritative Roman source that counter argues these objections?
Anonymous
Posted: 2007/8/7 20:28  Updated: 2007/8/8 2:40
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Romans828 you asked "Does anyone know where there is an authoritative Roman source that counter argues these objections?"

The answer is yes. See the book "Jesus, Peter & the Keys: A Scriptural Handbook on the Papacy: by Scott Butler,Norman Dahlgren, and David Hess

Also Cardinal Newman was an Anglican scholar who became a Roman Catholic priest and later a Cardinal.

Blessings

Kimlm
shytech74
Posted: 2007/8/7 21:23  Updated: 2007/8/7 21:23
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/4/23
From: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1036
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
I really do feel for this man. Although I'm nowhere near being in his shoes, his struggles come across as real. While I think the mantle of bishop might more easily be laid aside for the greater good, in this case at least, his respect for his consecrators and the intention with which that was carried out, speaks well of him. It seems that the pressure of ongoing heresy in TEC have finally out weighed any scruples. I wish him well.
It is rather a sad witness against Anglicanism as a whole that a man should be driven to such a pass in the first place... If I could find a Latin Mass parish I'd be next.
Ikerliker
Posted: 2007/8/7 21:47  Updated: 2007/8/7 21:47
Home away from home
Joined: 2007/1/16
From: PA
Posts: 2046
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Also Cardinal Newman was an Anglican Bishop who became a Catholic Bishop and later a Cardinal.

And later St. John Newman. He is hermetically sealed in a glass coffin in a church in Philadelphia. It's rather creepy. When I saw it, it bothered me. He's laying there fully vested as I recall. It's been a while since I was there and I have no desire to go back.
ZachS
Posted: 2007/8/7 23:59  Updated: 2007/8/12 17:19
Home away from home
Joined: 2007/5/1
From:
Posts: 210
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
kimlm:

"A Scriptural Handbook"...? You must be kidding.

I can hear ArchBishop of Cantebury Thomas Cranmer (D-1553) laughing at you rather loudly.



ZachS
ZachS
Posted: 2007/8/8 0:02  Updated: 2007/8/8 0:04
Home away from home
Joined: 2007/5/1
From:
Posts: 210
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
ejsteele: Roman?

I will accept only authentic evidence of regenerated congregations bearing the fruit of the Holy Spirit.

And you?


ZachS
Uriel1
Posted: 2007/8/8 0:30  Updated: 2007/8/8 0:30
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2007/8/8
From:
Posts: 24
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
John Henry Cardinal Newman was neither an Amglican bishop nor a Roman Catholic bishop
Howell
Posted: 2007/8/8 1:30  Updated: 2007/8/8 1:31
Home away from home
Joined: 2007/1/13
From: Colorado
Posts: 444
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Shytech74: With what Pope Benedict is doing in clarifying Vatican II, there should be a Latin Mass coming to a theater near you soon. If you get desperate, move to Denver, where Holy Ghost RC church sings a Latin Mass every Sunday at 10am. The professional, paid choir sings a Mozart, Schubert et al Mass every week and the spoken litergy is mostly in Latin. As a half-century Episcopalian who left St. John's Episcopal Cathedral in Denver after GC2006, and giving Catholicism a year's trial, I can tell you that attending a Latin sung Mass has been a breath of fresh air. Having sung "Gaudeamus Igitur" in Lutheran Prep School and memorized "Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres" back then in Latin class, it's nice to get back to a language where the word "like" isn't every fourth word.
Anonymous
Posted: 2007/8/8 2:41  Updated: 2007/8/8 2:41
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Thanks for the correction Ureil1.

Blessings

Kimlm
hum1021
Posted: 2007/8/8 2:41  Updated: 2007/8/8 2:41
Just popping in
Joined: 2005/6/18
From:
Posts: 4
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Uriel is right; Newman was never a bishop either Anglican or Roman.
CalAggie
Posted: 2007/8/8 6:02  Updated: 2007/8/8 6:22
Home away from home
Joined: 2006/4/9
From: Davis, CA
Posts: 156
 On Rome
Honestly, it's faith...

It could go either way concerning the arguments about Rome's primacy. I believe it's purely political. Really, Jerusalem should be... since Christ died there. But Rome gained power being seat of the Roman Empire. That power of Christendom followed eastward to Constantinople when the capital was switched and only when the Western part of the Empire capitulated to the barbarian invasions did the Latin Church begin to see itself as a unifying agent and power to fill the void of the Roman Empire. This set it at odds with the Greek Church and the "Roman Empire" in Constantinople.

I'm sufficiently certain that both the Orthodox and Roman Churches work with meager evidence that boils down to a person's perception of the church. If they have good Roman Catholic friends and have a high opinion, then they will probably go across the Tiber. If they were wronged, or have witnessed Roman Catholics in a less than holy light, they might be receptive to Orthodoxy. Among the uninformed (generally speaking) the choice might be to bolt for Rome, being the more familiar of the two traditions in Western Society (Assuming you have not seen Deer Hunter), instead of crossing the Bosporus.

I personally believe (as in my opinion) that America has a deep seeded prejudice against Roman Catholics. They are the poor, scruffy, and uneducated immigrants from Italy, Ireland, and Mexico. With no official church and the rich Protestant tradition in American politics, Catholics are seen as foreign. The famous issue surrounding Kennedy (It's rather laughable to think Kennedy would really would have "taken orders" from the Pope, knowing the person he was).
So Americans already start off with a prejudice, add to the mix Illegal Immigration, Priest Molestation, Liberal Politicians and Roman Dominance (being the largest single denomination in the world), it's not wonder many Christians think ill of them. But I think it's on the whole unwarranted. It's kinda funny the way people like to always 'stick em one to Rome'.

Now the Roman Church is not perfect it fails, and sometimes miserably. All churches do. We are human, and this is earth. The Kingdom of Heaven is perfect and untainted. I think the United States Roman Catholic Church is generally weak. They have the atheists who bash them, the Protestants, the evangelicals, the Muslims and their own liberal adherents. All this has made for a relatively timid American Episcopate that I think has been largely ineffective in transforming their American Province into religious life. I think the Vatican should do something about its bishops and try to find a way to reinvigorate itself. I think if more Roman Catholics were seen by people as faithful, and if they actually stood up for Orthodox Christian values and faith, they would garner more respect from the Protestant community. There is many a Catholic priest who is as crazy as any nut job in TEC. Rome would do well to take heed of the Anglican Communion's Crisis.

Leave the man alone, he chose orthodoxy over heresy. We should be thankful.
ICXCNIKA
Posted: 2007/8/8 10:49  Updated: 2007/8/8 10:49
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2006/6/18
From: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 82
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Ikerliker,

Just an aside...the relics of which you speak in Philly aren't of St. John Newman, but of St. John Neumann...completely different person.
Truthseekr
Posted: 2007/8/8 13:31  Updated: 2007/8/8 13:31
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/9/14
From: terra firma ................ ( just a pilgrim passing thru )
Posts: 784
 the pope returns to Roma
Quote:

He said that he had long prayed for a reunion of his church with Rome, but that possibility had foundered after the Episcopal Church, and the related Church of England, began ordaining women.",,,

Ten months later, after Pope discovered that Rome would not recognize his Episcopal orders, he returned to TEC, saying it was simply too painful to not have his orders recognized. The first time around, Bernard Cardinal Law, Archbishop of Boston, officially received Pope in a highly publicized event.


The article quoted him as saying "he had succumbed to a 'growing unease' about his original decision. His unease, Bishop Pope said, lay in his feeling that he could not give up his status as a bishop, which he would have to do to be re-ordained as a Catholic priest. He described the rank of bishop in mystical terms, saying it was 'God-given' and not for him to surrender.


Sigh... I think there is a lot more to this story.

Best I remember, many years ago, the discussions I heard as a young layman in a DOFW church. I still have a lot of respect for Bishop. Clarence Pope. Before throwing posts at him here, read this story.

Bp. Pope was an early leader in resisting the liberal ecusan church over the authority of Holy Scriptures, and over W.O. When that resistance was obviously failing, even way back then, there was an interest by some in the Anglo-catholic community to see if those that leaned toward RC doctrine/tradition/worship, could migrate in some manner across the Tiber. Bp. Pope was the walking the point on this very risky patrol.

If that had worked, it might have opened a path for the Anglo-catholic clergy / congregations to migrate, en mass, into the RC church, hopefully under Bp. Pope. I.e. The potential of Anglican use RC churches you see today, but they would have come on line back many years ago… After all, a lot of the Anglo-catholics very deep in their hearts were wanna-be Roma anyway. After all, the RC church could have benefited from an infusion of committed people and clergy and their money.

But, something happened that caused the “ten months later” thing. Can anyone really believe that the terms of becoming part of the RC Clergy / Bishopric were not discussed in detail prior to the change? After Bp. Pope had gone public, supposedly the RC's came up with the renouncing the orders thing and who knows what else, and the whole thing folded.

Why did it fold? Who really knows? Could have been genuine miscommunications or it could have been deliberate. Could have been the Vatican pink mafia not happy with an influx of Bible believing “sin is wrong” clergy. Could have been the potential for turf wars on how existing purple shirts with their fiefdoms would interact with a new purple shirt in town. Could have been not needing two popes in the RC church. Could have just been spiritual pride in many places, who knows… Take your pick, add, delete, or combine possible reasons. Somewhere in there is a trace of truth.

Whatever happened, the perception from way down in my DOFW church was that the RC church had encouraged Bp. Pope to get out on a tree limb publicly, and then worked on sawing that limb off the tree to leave him dangling.

Consider that when one considers swimming the Tiber. Plan on starting all over.
Other that the “Orthodox” Churches the RC’s are in relationship with,
The RC’s do not consider others to be priests, churches. I have never seen anything that leads me to believe the RC’s think the rest of us are even Christians… They neither respect nor reward the Anglo-catholics working in the Anglican Communion.

If the RC’s float your spiritual boat, and help you walk with the LORD, then have at it.
If not, find somewhere to get in communion with your Christian brothers and sisters and strive to get closer to the LORD every day.

Anyway, that is my perception from the back of the bus… and I still wish Bishop Pope well on his journey.

The whole issue of Anglicans who are wanna-be RC’s, and don’t just go do it, the whole thing still puzzles me to this day.

truthseekr
Romans828
Posted: 2007/8/8 20:42  Updated: 2007/8/8 20:42
Home away from home
Joined: 2006/6/27
From:
Posts: 244
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
ejsteele,

I'm not sure we were communicating. I would like a source of information that is authoritative in the sense that it accurately represents the views of the Roman Catholic Church. If there is no document released by the Vatican, then I suppose a Roman Catholic imprimatur suffices.

To me, there is a quantum leap from "accepting" the teachings of the Roman magisterium and Church traditions, on the one hand, and personally agreeing with them on the other. Obviously I'd accept the Church's word for what the Church believes, but that doesn't mean that I'd accept the Church's theology as my own.

This does highlight vastly different ways in which the Church of Rome and other churches handle the question of authority. Actually, the way Rome handles authority is a bigger problem for me -- keeping me from becoming Roman Catholic myself -- than any single Roman doctrine.
Ikerliker
Posted: 2007/8/8 23:32  Updated: 2007/8/8 23:32
Home away from home
Joined: 2007/1/16
From: PA
Posts: 2046
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Just an aside...the relics of which you speak in Philly aren't of St. John Newman, but of St. John Neumann...completely different person.

Oops, my bad. Either way, whoever it is, it's creepy!
bcwright
Posted: 2007/8/8 23:44  Updated: 2007/8/8 23:44
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/7/4
From:
Posts: 526
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
1) As has been noted, John Newman was never a bishop, either Anglican or Catholic. He was, however, a Cardinal - it is not necessary for a Cardinal to be a Bishop, though that is usually the case.

2) Likewise, Newman was never declared a saint, nor has he been beatified, though he was declared Venerable. The case for his beatification and canonization is ongoing.

3) To the best of my knowledge there is no theological impediment to a married Catholic or Orthodox priest being consecrated as bishop - though there is a very longstanding discipline in both churches that forbids it. Therefore, Orthodox and Eastern Rite Catholic bishops are always celibate even though many of their priests are not. Since there is a very strong tradition that Peter was married (not merely widowed) during much or all of his ministry, it would be difficult to think of grounds for an absolute prohibition. Nevertheless, none of this is exactly new ground, and one would think that Bp. Pope would have been aware of it before he converted the previous time(s).
etagert
Posted: 2007/8/8 23:58  Updated: 2007/8/8 23:58
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2006/5/4
From:
Posts: 143
 Re: the pope returns to Roma
The Shrine of the Holy Whapping has a bit more detail on the whole matter...

HolyWhapping.BlogSpot.Com

http://holywhapping.blogspot.com/2007_08_01_archive.html#6155739192997349654
bcwright
Posted: 2007/8/9 0:04  Updated: 2007/8/9 0:17
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/7/4
From:
Posts: 526
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
The answer is yes. See the book "Jesus, Peter & the Keys: A Scriptural Handbook on the Papacy: by Scott Butler, Norman Dahlgren, and David Hess

Pace ZachS, this book does contain a very good summary of the most important Biblical and patristic arguments for Petrine and Roman primacy. It is not, of course, the last word - the Orthodox, for example, would beg to differ with the authors' conclusions!

However it would make a very good starting point for obtaining a better insight into the Catholic arguments for those doctrines, and for an overview of where one might look for arguments or evidence for or against them.
Archbishop
Posted: 2007/8/10 18:26  Updated: 2007/8/10 18:26
Just popping in
Joined: 2007/8/10
From:
Posts: 3
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
In response to Truthseekr's post... The move from Anglicanism to either Rome or Orthodoxy is a very difficult one, especially for a priest. Rome basically requires that one "renounce" all of what you did at the altar for your entire ministry. On the other hand, Orthodoxy has a different approach. Orthodoxy puts no judgment on the orders of other Churches, she only knows what is necessary for her own, simply put, to be ordained by an Orthodox Bishop. Therefore, it is an easier transition to Orthodoxy than to Rome. Besides, most Anglo-Catholics would actually find very little difference in making the transition externally now that a number of Orthodox jurisdictions have Western Rites. In some jurisdictions (ours) we have decided that the parish owns the property so as never to have the problems which parishes are having today in ECUSA. What keeps us together is our common belief in Jesus Christ and the Faith of the Undivided Church, not the ownership of buildings.
etagert
Posted: 2007/8/10 20:39  Updated: 2007/8/10 20:39
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2006/5/4
From:
Posts: 143
 Re: FT. WORTH: Bishop Clarence Pope Returns to Rome...Again
Support VOL

Please support VirtueOnline with a tax deductible gift.


Your support of our ministry keeps the world informed with the truth!


   


VOL Sponsors



Global Anglican Theological Institute

Multi-Lingual Bible & Theological Education



GlobalAnglican.org
sponsored by VOL







St. Michael
the Archangel

Philadelphia, PA

http://www.anglicanphiladelphia.org

Traditional
Anglo-Catholic
Worship
for PA, NJ, DE

Worship at 8 & 10am
215 Belmont Ave
Bala Cynwyd, PA
215-247-1092
Anglican
Philadelphia.org





Contact Us for
advertising rates.