COLUMBUS, OH: Episcopalians pass compromise resolution calling for restraint
By Hans Zeiger
VirtueOnline Correspondent
www.virtueonline.org
COLUMBUS, OHIO (6/21/06)-The 75th General Convention of the Episcopal Church today passed a resolution calling for the church to restrain from consent to bishops "whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church and will lead to further strains on communion." Following as it does a rejection of the same thing on Tuesday, the passage of the resolution was, in the words of one deputy, approached "the height of hypocrisy."
Resolution A161, effecting a moratorium on the ordination of homosexual bishops and the blessing of homosexual unions, failed in the House of Deputies on Tuesday, threatening alienation of the Episcopal Church from the worldwide Anglican Communion. In a last ditch effort to save Episcopalian-Anglican relations, Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold convened a Special Legislative session on Wednesday morning, calling on Bishops and Deputies to consider an emergency resolution, number B033, that would express what the convention "actually" believed.
"This is the final day of General Convention," Griswold said. "What I believe we actually yearn for has not been adequately reflected through the workings of our legislative processes...We must now act with generosity and imagination so that our actions are a clearer reflection of the willingness of the majority of us to relinquish something in order to serve a larger purpose."
After Griswold's speech, Bishops held a heated session in which Griswold became insistent from the chair's seat on the need to quickly pass Resolution B033. When Bishops attempted to amend the resolution to loosen language in favor of homosexuals, Griswold reacted sharply: "We are trying to deal with something that does not fit easily into a legislative process. I hope we can find a way in which to maneuver through this that doesn't make us victims of the legislative process...If we aren't clear by lunchtime then we might as well forget the whole thing...If we don't have something substantial, we might have a very difficult time getting the Archbishop to invite the Episcopal Church to the Lambeth Conference."
"I'm excited that this is hopefully a way forward for all Episcopalians without unnecessarily closing any doors,"
Bishop Dorsey Henderson of the Diocese of Upper South Carolina, a member of the Special Committee that originally considered the Windsor resolutions, and the author of Resolution B033, told VirtueOnline.
"I'm heartbroken with the gay and lesbian community and others that are hurt, but I'm convinced that in the longterm this is the best way forward for the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion."
Another bishop, the Rt. Rev. Dr. Jeffrey Steenson of the Diocese of Rio Grande, told VirtueOnline, "I think that represents the best that the House of Bishops could have done under the circumstances. I personally don't think it's going to be judged compliant, but it's not our call anymore. It's the rest of the Communion that will make that choice."
Additional pressure on the House of Bishops came from Presiding Bishop-elect Katherine Jefferts Schori, who compared the divisions of the Anglican Communion to conjoined twins that cannot be separated until both are able to survive independently. While reaffirming her support for homosexuals, Jefferts Schori indicated that compromise was critical. "My sense is that the original resolution is the best we're going to do today."
Following Jefferts Schori's speech, a majority of the Bishops passed the resolution and sent it the House of Deputies.
Emotional debate on the House floor ensued within a half-hour time limit.
Dr. Louie Crew, a delegate from the Diocese of Newark and the founder of the homosexual church lobby Integrity, asserted what he perceived as the role of the Holy Spirit in leading the Episcopal Church to its present pro-homosexual stance. "This would be like trying to cut the tone from out under the Holy Spirit," he said.
Jerry Kabell of the Diocese of Eastern Michigan echoed Crew by defending the actions of the 2003 General Convention. "In doing so we were following the leading of the Holy Spirit. In doing this now in this resolution we are saying that we will refrain from following the leading of the Holy Spirit." Besides, Kabell suggested, the Episcopal Church could work well with many nations of the world without having to compromise its autonomy.
Then came Katherine.
Bishop Jefferts Schori entered the House of Deputies to give a version of the speech she had made moments earlier to the Bishops. "I am fully committed to the full inclusion of gay and lesbian members of this church...If you do pass this resolution you have to be willing to keep working with all of your might at finding a common mind in this church...I think that is the best we are going to manage at this point in our church's history."
Following Bishop Jefferts Schori's remarks, few were willing to insult the mood of consensus that seemed to build. "This resolution tears me apart," said Sally Johnson of the Diocese of Minnesota as she choked back tears. "As a gift to the presiding bishop-elect I think we should adopt it without amendment." The Rev. Philip C. Linder of the Diocese of Upper North Carolina added, "Let us rise to the call of reconciliation and sacrificial leadership.'
But as the debate continued, it became clear that the irreconcilable differences expressed on Tuesday had not been eradicated. All that had changed was a reduction of the proposal and an increase of pressure from the top.
The Rev. Canon Paul Lambert of the Diocese of Dallas opposed the resolution from the right. "It's less than what we can do. It's not as good as we can do. And it's sending a message that will continue to fracture our relationship with the Anglican Communion."
And the Very Rev. John R. Spencer of the Diocese of Quincy said, "This resolution is not even in the parking lot of [the Windsor Report] ballpark...It does not address the very specific manner of life which the 74th General Convention acted on...It is tossing half a karat to our friends in the communion as if they are not intelligent enough to see through" what he alleged was a reversal of the convention within 24 hours that "comes very close to the height of hypocrisy."
When a deputy proposed to amend Resolution B033 to limit the moratorium on homosexual bishops to three years, when the next General Convention is held, the Chair only recognized opponents of the amendment until the time limit was nearly expired.
In the final moments, Dr. E. Bevan Stanley of the Diocese of Newark was allowed to speak for the amendment. "For some 30 years the Holy Spirit has been guiding this church into the understanding of a new truth that culminated in the actions in 2003." While the Episcopal Church had been in tune with the movement of the Holy Spirit, other provinces of the Anglican Communion "have not participated in the conversations that have been mandated by the Lambeth Councils for the last 20 years."
In the end, the Convention voted against the "Holy Spirit" in order to stay in the Anglican Communion, weak as the intentions behind the vote may have been.
RESOLUTION B033
"On the Election of Bishops"
Resolved, the House of Deputies concurring, that the 75th General Convention receive and embrace The Windsor Report's invitation to engage in a process of healing and reconciliation; and be it further Resolved, that this Convention call upon Standing Committees and bishops with jurisdiction to exercise restraint by not consenting to the consecration of any candidate to the episcopate whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church and will lead to further strains on communion.
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| islandbear | Posted: 2006/6/21 23:32 Updated: 2006/6/21 23:32 |
Quite a regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/4/23 From: Rochester, NY Posts: 68 |
+In the Name of the Most Holy and Undivded Trinity, Amen.
I was always taught that the spirit moves to more fully reveal scripture, not to muddy it. I guess that we should now seek amendment to the ordination vows to say that the Holy Scripture of the Old and New Testaments contain all things necessary for salvation, unless the "Holy Spirit" speaks otherwise to Louis Crew. I am reminded of a gentleman I once knew that played the daily number "God" gave him when he visited his favorite water fountain. This is the reason that in Catholic christianity that means verifying the word(s) given by reference to the larger community. What the leadership of GC didn't get is that in 2006, that means the faithful in Christ Jesus throughout the world. There is no way for them to hide their sin and craziness from the rest of the world. To David the VOL writers, and the faithful bloggers, thank you for making sure all the faithful do know what is going on. |
| MichaelA | Posted: 2006/6/21 23:36 Updated: 2006/6/21 23:36 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/5/29 From: Posts: 869 |
"In the end, the Convention voted against the "Holy Spirit" in order to stay in the Anglican Communion, weak as the intentions behind the vote may have been."
Gee, I hope the Holy Spirit survives the shock... Seriously, Frank Griswold shows his reasonable political understanding, along with his sadly deficient political skills (if you were going to pass this resolution, wouldn't the START of the Convention have been a smarter time to do it, Frank? That is what Rowan was trying to tell you through York all the time...). Fortunately, the Lord has indeed confounded their politics. So, what to do? I suggest firstly, publicise the comments made by various Liberals in this debacle. Take copies and pass them on to Anglicans who will listen. Shine a spotlight on their oh-so-obvious manoeuverings. Secondly, find a congregation that is faithful, and has the courage to call this rubbish what it is. That may be in one of the few faithful congregations within ECUSA or it may be in a related denomination such as UECNA, REC, or APA (all affiliated with and endorsed by Archbishop Akinola), or somewhere else again. You may indeed be led to a non-Anglican church - if so, then that is the Lord's leading and you have our blessings as a brother or sister in christ - but it will be a shame to lose you! Thirdly, concentrate on the positive things - building up the church at the personal and congregational level. This is where real strength lies. Fourthly, don't be led into despair by Satan - ECUSA is not the Holy City and never was, so its loss is not a deadly blow to any of us. Best regards Michael |
| erennach | Posted: 2006/6/21 23:50 Updated: 2006/6/21 23:50 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/17 From: Tennessee Mountains Posts: 9 |
The perfect theme song for Bishop Katherine et al:
From 1968 and "The Crazy World of Arthur Brown": "Fire!" |
| Hokie92 | Posted: 2006/6/22 0:16 Updated: 2006/6/22 0:16 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/21 From: Virginia Posts: 7 |
The great thing is that the Diocese of Newark will name a new Bishop shortly. I wonder how the spirit will speak to the revisionists then.
The cat is out of the bag for TEC. B033 is a lame attempt to put it back in. |
| Damascus | Posted: 2006/6/22 0:41 Updated: 2006/6/22 1:47 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/9/26 From: Republic of Karelia Posts: 640 |
I do believe this resolution does one of the things that the WR requested. I think that it is very unlikely that an openly gay bishop would get the necessary approvals from the bishops and the standing committees between now and the next Lambeth Conference. I would reckon that there are at least a third of the bishops who would vote yes on a gay bishop but I think it would be unlikely to get a majority to do so. After Lambeth, I would say that all bets are off. I'm not sure that the less strident bishops would feel constrained to vote no after 2008.
I think this does nothing to stop the blessings of same sex unions. The diocese that are full speed ahead on this are not likely to slow down and their colleagues are extremely unlikely to do anything to them if they continue with this practice. There are a hard-core group of at least thirty revisionists bishops who are not willing to make any concessions to stay within the Anglican Communion. Even if most of the bishops decide to go slow on same sex unions, this group will continue on. This also does nothing to address the fact that the majority of ECUSA bishops are practicing some religion other than traditional Christianity. Their resolutions attacking the Bible and their failure to take a stand in favor of resolutions proclaiming the unique path to salvation through Jesus Christ should tell you just about all you want to know about where this church is headed. I don't think I have ever heard so much reference to the Holy Spirit as I have heard this week. It seems that the Holy Spirit no longer acts in consort with Scripture to make us understand God's will, it acts to override Scripture. It is curious that the Holy Spirit, after years of encouraging good morality, has now become a foot-loose swingle who frequents bath houses. This situation with the revisionists greatly reminds me of a young child who has an imaginary friend. It is never the child who wrote on the wall with crayons, it is always the imaginary friend. In this case it is the Holy Spirit that is telling the revisionists that Jesus is only one of many ways to have a relationship with the Father, that the Bible is oppressive, and that sexual restraint is outdated. The next time that you see some attractive teenager sunbathing in her bikini, if you start to get a strange sensation in your pants, be not afraid, it is merely the Holy Spirit at work. And we all know that it would be a sin not to do as the Holy Spirit is guiding us, right? Please forgive my sacrilegious tone here but I can't believe that these people have the balls to make this ridiculous argument with a straight face. They have totally turned the whole notion of the Holy Spirit on its head. I can only hope that others in the Anglican Communion will take as much offense to this outrage as I do. I don't know how the Anglican Communion will react to what has occurred this week. It would seem to me that a reasonable person would conclude that ECUSA has had no change of heart about the direction that they are heading. They have made a modest concession to try and preserve their space at the table for a few more years, but does anyone really believe that ECUSA doctrine is going to come back in line with Christian doctrine? The unity of the Church is dependent on a shared set of assumptions and beliefs. The Bible is the framework under which Christians formulate their shared beliefs. Once your belief system becomes experiential and independent of the Bible, there can be no unity. Everyone has their own set of experiences and hence their own opinions. It is the common experience of the Bible that gives unity to our Christian lives. Without the Bible there is anarchy. I would strongly encourage the orthodox leaders in the U.S. and those in the Anglican Communion to remember that there is a time for talk and then there is a time for action. I think the time for talk has passed. The longer that this drags on, the stronger that the revisionists get and the weaker that we get. Look how much stronger that the revisionists were at this General Convention than they were in 2003. ECUSA is a cancer on the Bride of Christ and if the surgeon does not operate soon, the cancer will have metastasized to the rest of the body. If some provision is not made for the orthodox who reside in apostate diocese, and soon, the patient will be dead before he is wheeled into surgery. People are not going to wait forever for the Anglicans to get their act together. We have waited long enough. If something decisive does not happen within a month or two of the end of this convention, people like me will have to throw in the towel with regard to Anglicanism and search for a new home. |
| OtisPage | Posted: 2006/6/22 1:10 Updated: 2006/6/22 1:23 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/1/4 From: Posts: 667 |
The liar of liars, Louie Crew, "asserted what he perceived as the role of the Holy Spirit in leading the Episcopal Church to its present pro-homosexual stance."
Louie Crew has no theological basis or ministerial right to state, “the role of the Holy Spirit in leading the Episcopal Church” on a "pro-homosexual stance". Crew’s statement is a self-fulfilling perception that blasphemes Christ’s Holy Spirit, and contradicts the Spirit’s inspiration of Scripture that indicts homosexuality as sin. (Mark 3:28-30) Further there is no evidence in Scripture that supports or endorses the homosexual lifestyles manifested in gays, lesbians and inherently promiscuous bisexual sexual relations. The opposite is true. Homosexuality is sin! (Rom. 1:26,27, Lev. 18:22, 20:13, 1 Cor. 6:9, 1 Tim. 1:10, Gen. 19: 1-9, Judg. 22:19, 1 Kin. 14:24 and Jude 7) History and the Christian tradition over thousands of years, in all religious denominations, condemn same-sex or bisexual sexual relations. Louie Crew’s perception speaks of God in an irreverent and impious manner and reviles and execrates His Holy Spirit. Archbishop elect Katharine Jefferts Schori, made it clear where she stands in an interview with CNN on issues attendant to Crew’s blaspheme. When asked if it was a sin to be homosexual, she grasped the relativistic hammer and replied: "I don't believe so." In seaking about homosexuality she gives the "gift" argument, "I believe that God creates us with different (sexual) gifts.” She ignores the negative consequences of suffering, moral shame, and disease! Schori joins Crew in endorsing the lie – and here is the theological rub that splits the Anglican Communion. |
| prodigal | Posted: 2006/6/22 1:15 Updated: 2006/6/22 1:15 |
Not too shy to talk ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/11 From: Posts: 26 |
Yes to Damascus (and others): the "private pastoral care to such persons" means SSU's, blessings, or whatever the term in your neighborhood may be... don't bother trying to explain the "private pastoral" part to parents whose children notice an announcement/picture of said service for local ECUSA clergy and his/her partner in the media... but, of course, we are WR compliant because GC did not "approve" such a rite... and, by gum, neither did the local diocese... even as copies of New Westminster's service are handed out at clergy meetings... at least *some* of the obvious double-speak has been called what it really is... at least one retired bp. I spoke to 1) admitted he really dd not care about the Africans and others in the AC (because they don't really have much in common with our beliefs, anyway) and 2) agreed (!) that the HOB looks ridiculous hiding behind polity and GC on the issue of liturgies, when THEY are the ones who tell their priests what liturgies they can or cannot celebrate... a convenient "who, us?!"
likewise, PB Frank sure dropped the gnostic meandering today when Lambeth invites were on the line... golly, what timing to suddenly be able to speak in short, clear prose... without a single reference to the Other whose mail may, indeed, get lost en route... Prodigal |
| Bill53 | Posted: 2006/6/22 1:23 Updated: 2006/6/22 1:23 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/13 From: Posts: 4 |
What would Mother Jesus do?
|
| seminary05 | Posted: 2006/6/22 2:00 Updated: 2006/6/22 2:00 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/6/2 From: Atlanta Posts: 4 |
so according to BO33 The new P.B.'s election is invalidated by the resolution? right? maybe? heresy?
|
| Cennydd | Posted: 2006/6/22 3:13 Updated: 2006/6/22 3:14 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/10/30 From: Los Banos, CA, Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin Posts: 6684 |
Otis, I don't necessarily think that the Anglican Communion is done for, but ECUSA sure is! We haven't heard from the primates yet, but after they've had time to thoroughly digest the votes at General Convention, we sure will!
The trumpets of the Lord will sound, and ECUSA's heretics won't like the music! Cennydd |
| rossi | Posted: 2006/6/22 7:27 Updated: 2006/6/22 8:40 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/18 From: Redcar, England Posts: 639 |
This resolution don't have any value, they are not repenting,they are not change day mind, they aproved it just becouse they want to stay in the
Ang. Com.,I don't think that Anglicans in Africa, Asia and Caribean and South Cone want to have any association with The Gay Church. |


















