ROLL OVER, BEETHOVEN
by Paul Zahl
March 26, 2006
Camille Paglia says it well in this week's New York Times (6 March 2006). She says that faculties like Harvard's want diversity in all things except diversity of thought. She could have been speaking of the Episcopal Church.
Paglia's point is apt to an editorial that has appeared in newspapers throughout the United States this past week, beginning with the Washington Post. It is an opinion piece by the Bishop of Washington, John Bryson Chane, accusing American traditionalist church people of backing figures such as Peter Akinola, the Primate of Nigeria, who is supporting a piece of repressive legislation in his homeland that criminalizes homosexual activity and is thus opposed to human rights. Bishop Chane wants the American "orthodox" to speak out against Archbishop Akinola's support of this legislation.
We certainly want to look at all things in the light of core Christianity. And if the Nigerian legislation is as bad as Bishop Chane says it is, then we are required to say something.
But I, for one, have become almost unable to "hear" anything that the power-people in the Episcopal Church have to say until they start acting with love toward those in the small minority over whom they have canonical power.
The embargo on Trinity Episcopal School for Ministry is an important symbolic symptom of a non-loving, non-space-conceding mind-set on the part of many of our bishops. The inhibitions and depositions of faithful clergy, many of whom have been ordained longer than the bishops who are inhibiting them, are completely wrong. The confusion of episcopal role and episcopal person, which creates a power-mentality unbecoming a Christian leader, is completely unsatisfactory.
I mean, when a churchman as faithful and long-serving as E ddie Gibbs - who changed my life and Mary's through a single address in Nottingham, England in 1973 (and he was a senior statesman in my book back then ) - is threatened with inhibition, one has to just say "Roll Over, Beethoven." This is beyond beyond. (Did you see the film From Beyond, based on an H.P. Lovecraft story? It may capture the nature of these clerical inhibitions.)
I cannot listen to what the majority has to say - and I would truly like to - until those who hold the cards just now, in a human sense, give a little. When they give us some real space, then I shall listen to what they have to say concerning our co-religionist Peter Akinola.
One thing needs to be understood: traditional Christians, Protestant and Catholic, Orthodox and Pentecostal, Episcopal and Free-Church, from the Pope to the PCA, can never accept active homosexual clergy and the blessing of same-sex unions in the Church. We are simply not entitled to do this, for the Bible does not entitle us to do it. It is not because we are mean. It is not because we are haters. It is not because we are prejudiced against a particular group. Not at all! That is not it. We are just not able to go beyond the Bible in this matter. Hang us upside down by our toes - it is certainly possible to destroy officially the ministry of sainted types - but we cannot deny our first principles, and, ultimately, as we see it, our Lord.
People who are under threat from power, which is traditional Christians today within the Episcopal setting, cannot hear what their governors are saying until their governors pull back, out of love. We all pray - and mean it when we say "pray" - that this will happen.
http://www.tesm.edu/deans-corner/dcchurch/beethoven
---The Rev. Dr. Paul Zahl is dean and president of Trinity Episcopal School for Ministry in Ambridge, PA.
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2006/3/26 16:22 Updated: 2006/3/26 16:22 |
|
Well said, well said. Thank you. I have a query, though. Perhaps I've missed it but, what is the embargo on Trinity which is referenced? I'm feeling a tad ignorant here.
I'm wondering, too, what Trinity will do when the total unraveling happens, as well as historical Nashotah House. Pax, Rj |
|
| Damascus | Posted: 2006/3/26 16:25 Updated: 2006/3/26 16:25 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/9/26 From: Republic of Karelia Posts: 640 |
This is an excellent piece. The ECUSA revisionists like to position themselves as the underdog despite the fact that they are clearly on top. They oppress a dissident minority in the name of "inclusivity." They will stick up for the right of everyone to be heard, as long as they are in exact agreement with them. This "group-think" mentality is essential to them because the core doctrines of their new belief system can be so easily debunked by simple logic. The last thing that any of them wants is for there to be a meaningful debate on the unprecedented changes that they champion.
They will avoid serious discussion of their views and values by wrapping themselves in the cloak of victim, and attacking anyone who opposes them as intolerant and a hater. They assume that because they hate those who disagree with them, that the inverse must also be true. If there is to be any hope of restoring unity within ECUSA, the revisionists bishops must call off their attack dog chancellors and leave room for the possibility that someone can disagree with their bishop without having the church implode. |
| Damascus | Posted: 2006/3/26 16:36 Updated: 2006/3/26 16:36 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/9/26 From: Republic of Karelia Posts: 640 |
Many diocese within ECUSA will not accept graduates from TESM and NH for Holy Orders. The last thing these bishops want in their diocese is a bunch of Evangelicals or Anglo-Catholics who have been trained to actually think for themselves. These schools still stress the authority of Scripture, and their course offerings in Marxist and Feminist theology are woefully lacking. They turn out the kind of confident Christian witnesses that are not appreciated in the feminized, GLBT culture of ECUSA.
|
| Fiona | Posted: 2006/3/26 22:57 Updated: 2006/3/26 22:57 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/1/18 From: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 1071 |
It's interesting that he quotes Camille Paglia, who I believe to be a lesbian. "And the point of my posting was what?" Just thought I would mention it.
Fiona |
| RCRIII | Posted: 2006/3/27 0:12 Updated: 2006/3/27 0:12 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/3/24 From: Posts: 119 |
Paglia may or may not be a lesbian, but she is a good and surprising thinker on a number of cultural and social issues and so forth.
|
| Traktaryan | Posted: 2006/3/27 19:47 Updated: 2006/3/27 19:47 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/7/16 From: Posts: 710 |
Many diocese within ECUSA will not accept graduates from TESM and NH for Holy Orders. The last thing these bishops want in their diocese is a bunch of Evangelicals or Anglo-Catholics who have been trained to actually think for themselves. These schools still stress the authority of Scripture, and their course offerings in Marxist and Feminist theology are woefully lacking. They turn out the kind of confident Christian witnesses that are not appreciated in the feminized, GLBT culture of ECUSA.
============ A Revisionist responds: Inclusivity has its limits, too. I mean, come on. We love to tell people how inclusive we are, but that doesn't mean we include just anyone! We'll ordain a man who is a sexually active homosexual. We're prepared to consecrate as bishop a woman who is involved in a lesbian relationship. We'll accept a seminary graduate who does not believe in the Virgin Birth, or the doctrine of original sin, or the Resurrection and Ascension of Jesus Christ. We'll even take a lesbian who is also involved in WICCA. We'd even consider accepting a man who was sexually involved with his sister! But we're NOT going to accept a Trinity or Nashotah House graduate. We do have our standards and image to think about ... |
| gregory | Posted: 2006/3/27 23:30 Updated: 2006/3/27 23:43 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/8/4 From: Nflorida Posts: 4436 |
RCRIII, Camille Paglia is definitely a lesibian.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia ""Just a few months after beginning her studies she attended a party in the home of R. W. B. Lewis, one of her teachers, and ended up being insulted by a prominent Yale psychiatrist named Robert Jay Lifton and his wife for being a lesbian. Lifton, at that time, was the Foundations' Fund Research Professor in Psychiatry at Yale, a position he held until 1984. His attack seems to have emboldened her to not only be out as a lesbian, but to be in everyone's face about it. She has repeatedly noted she was publicly out as a lesbian at Yale Graduate School, and was actually the only open lesbian there from 1968 to 1972, a fact which harmed her career. As she told reporter Dan Savage in 1992: "I took the career price for that. I shoved my lesbianism down people’s throats when I wasn’t getting any pleasure from it; I couldn’t find anyone to be with! There is the irony, I took all the negatives without any of the positives! I tried. I tried to pick up women, I tried. In 1969 I traveled Europe with the handbook, The Gay Guide to Europe. "" Click here for her website |
| dturk | Posted: 2006/3/28 13:29 Updated: 2006/3/28 13:29 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/5/26 From: Posts: 416 |
Paul Zahl has made a good point. The entire authority of the Church comes from God, and can only be maintained and respected as long as it continues to conform with the Holy Scriptures. Once it deviates from this, it becomes apostate and has no more moral authority than the Britney Spears Fan Club.
Chane and the rest of his heretical fellow travelers, hold on to power through canons, parlimentary minipulation, and gross intimidation. They have no Biblical authority, and consequently no moral authority, whatsoever. Their political base and their trust funds are quickly eroding in direct proportion to their arrogance. |
















