Register now for more content and features!!    Login   Home | News | FAQ | eBooks | Weblinks | Gallery | Contact Us
News Topics
Special Reports
Columnists
VirtueOnline
Search
VOL Sponsors

North American
Anglican


The Orthodox Journal for Anglicans in North America

Historical, Theological, Practical

39Articles.com



Land of a
Thousand Hills
Coffee


Drink Coffee
Do Good



Sustainable Ministry: Coffee, Community, Social Justice

DrinkCoffee
DoGood.com



Orthodox Anglican
Priest's Manual



Hardcover and Electronic copies available

OrthoChap.com


Contact Us for advertising rates.

As Eye See It : The Gay Invention
Posted by David Virtue on 2005/11/29 12:00:00 (2486 reads)

The Gay Invention

Homosexuality Is a Linguistic as Well as a Moral Error

by R. V. Young
Touchstone Magazine

For thousands of years, until the late 1800s, our ancestors were completely oblivious to the existence of a fundamentally distinct class of human beings. Indeed, during the long period of Greco-Roman antiquity and more than a millennium and a half of Christian civilization, man did not even have a name for this class.

Or so asserts an almost universal assumption fixed in the language almost everyone uses: that "heterosexuals" and "homosexuals" are two permanently and innately different kinds of human being, and that "sexual orientation" constitutes a difference comparable to the difference between male and female. Widespread acceptance of "homosexuality" and associated terms thus biases discussion of the subject before an argument is even formulated.

Terms Lacking

What might be called the philological evidence calls this notion into question. If it were true, someone would long ago have given this class a name. That no one did until very recently suggests that the notion is not true.

In the first footnote of the first chapter of Greek Homosexuality, which is generally regarded as the definitive treatment of its subject, Oxford classical scholar K. J. Dover points out that the ancient Greek language "has no nouns corresponding to the English nouns 'a homosexual' and 'a heterosexual'." Such an observation would seem to call for more notice than is accorded by a single short footnote, but even the apparent concession is misleading, insofar as it suggests that the absence of these terms is a peculiarity of Greek.

In fact, Latin also lacks these terms and the same is true of Old and Middle English. Among modern European languages the word that corresponds to the English "homosexual" is generally a variant on the same word: in Spanish homosexual and in Dutch homoseksueel, for example. German also offers gleichgeschlechtlich, which is simply a combination of two Germanic roots, gleich and Geschlecht, that correspond to the Greek ( homo = same) and Latin ( sexus = sex) of the English word.

This English word is itself a very recent coinage. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, both "homosexual" and "homosexuality" first appeared in English in 1892, along with "heterosexual" and "heterosexuality," in an English translation of Richard von Kraft-Ebing's Psychopathologia Sexualis (1886) and turn up again five years later in Havelock Ellis's Studies in the Psychology of Sex.

To read all of The Gay Invention, please click on the link below:

http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=18-10-036-f

--

R. V. Young is Professor of English at North Carolina State University. His most recent book is Doctrine and Devotion in Seventeenth-Century Poetry (Boydell & Brewer), and he is currently at work on a book on Shakespeare and on a translation and critical edition of the Flemish humanist Justus Lipsius’s De Constantia. He and his wife, who are parishioners at St. Joseph’s Catholic Church in Raleigh, have five grown children and eight grandchildren.

Social Bookmarking
Bookmark to: Favit Bookmark to: Digg Bookmark to: Del.icio.us Bookmark to: Facebook Bookmark to: Reddit Bookmark to: StumbleUpon Bookmark to: Furl Bookmark to: Google Bookmark to: Yahoo Bookmark to: Technorati Information        
Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Poster Thread
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/11/29 21:15  Updated: 2005/11/29 21:15
 Re: The Gay Invention
A noteworthy article. The pen is indeed mightier than the sword. He who controls the language of discourse will control the debate. Revolutionaries have long known this: the Bolsheviks, for example, claimed a name suggesting they were the majority when they were not. Do we call it "SDI" or "Star Wars"? Are our opponents "pro-choice" or "pro-abortion"? Which party's name has more mass-appeal: Republicans' of Democrats'? The list is endless, and too often the right is oblivious to the preemptive use of psycholinguistics.

What's in a name? Way too much. Since the Garden of Eden to name something was to have power over it. Until the Right learns to be more sophisticated in setting and using the terms of the debate, we will continue to fight with one arm tied behind our backs.
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/11/29 21:56  Updated: 2005/11/29 23:16
 Re: The Gay Invention
It is truly a good article for all to read. Long but worth the read. I have long wondered what's in a name as a child growing up, and now I know just how powerful it is, and how we can twist words to suit ourselves. Case in point the word "Homophobic" which means :

1. Fear of or contempt for lesbians and gay men.
2. Behavior based on such a feeling.

I personally do not fear G&Ls and I suspect most people don't either. Seeing that G&Ls have used this word (fairly successfully) to drive fear into normal people and politicians so that they can get their way in society, I suggest we start using the word "Heterophobic" to use as a counter argument when we are labelled homophobic. Its only natural, since they fear our lifestyle. Arguments don't seem to get anywhere. After all it contrary to the normal lifestyle.

BHTech
essodalori
Posted: 2005/11/29 22:02  Updated: 2005/11/29 22:03
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/9/15
From:
Posts: 4904
 Re: The Gay Invention
Indeed, BHTech.

Homosexuals suffer from a severe psychological disorder known as opposite-sex-o-phobia - which renders them fearful and unable to naturally bind with the opposite sex, and which renders them incapable of recognizing that they are abnormal.

It is a sorry disease which fortunately in many cases can be cured.

With Christian love,

Essodalori
gregory
Posted: 2005/11/29 22:43  Updated: 2005/11/30 13:05
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/8/4
From: Nflorida
Posts: 4436
 Re: The Gay Invention
""It is truly a good article for all to read. Long but worth the read."" but i felt dirty/sick at points while reading the article.


"Until the Right learns to be more sophisticated in setting and using the terms of the debate, we will continue to fight with one arm tied behind our backs."
Well stoneridge, i'd fight with "one arm tied..." alongside you but would try to remain quiet...

Saving The Whole World With

Matthew 27:2
ConsProf
Posted: 2005/11/30 0:02  Updated: 2005/11/30 0:02
Just popping in
Joined: 2005/9/3
From: Edmond, OK
Posts: 13
 Re: The Gay Invention
Excellent article. The discussion of the developement of the use of the term gender vs. sex was new to me and very interesting.
Joe of the Mountain
Posted: 2005/11/30 0:23  Updated: 2005/11/30 0:23
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/1/3
From:
Posts: 3472
 Re: The Gay Invention
Indeed BHTech. Thier use of language is innovative, persuasive and popular. The Right would rather start a fight over a word instead of use it effectively. Myself included... How to balance instruction with counter-propaganda?
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/11/30 1:17  Updated: 2005/11/30 2:06
 Smokin' Out The Gays...Pulling Them Out Of Their Closet...
I concur with BHTech that maybe the time has come for the term of "Heterophobe" to be used as a tool in the combat against the pernicious revisionists who have infiltrated the Church.

Maybe some *shake and bake* expeditions(shake 'em up with some mortar rounds, bake them with white phosphorus)

Just kidding


ps. 'Tis out of Love that one should HATE homoerotic behavior and at the same time offer to guide the homosexual to acheiving release from the terrible ordeal he/she has put themselves in by their own volition.

Think of becoming a *midwife* to help a homo/lesbo, or anyone else who suffers because of their sin, to give birth to their own faith. You yourself cannot give them faith, only God can, IF THEY wish to be healed of their sin-sick soul!!! Yea, to be a Christian is to be a midwife unto others.
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/11/30 5:05  Updated: 2005/11/30 5:05
 An alternate definition
a couple of alternate definitions

Ho·mo·pho·be

1. A person with an irrational fear of appearing passe or being viewed with contempt for not accepting homosexual behavior as normal.

2. A person who fears their homosexual activity being viewed as abnormal leading to the overwhelming need to force people to view their lifestyle as normal.


Steven
Joe of the Mountain
Posted: 2005/12/1 2:21  Updated: 2005/12/1 2:21
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/1/3
From:
Posts: 3472
 Re: Smokin' Out The Gays...Pulling Them Out Of Their Cl
Giovanni, I see you've learned the truly persuasive methods of small arms It's a whole lot more effective than endless gibbering!

But to your point, I've "converted" a number of garden variety liberals (straight, not gay), and it took several years of intense, long-term commitment and much frustration.

I think it's like the cult deprogramming of the 1970s... but it works.
OtisPage
Posted: 2005/12/1 3:49  Updated: 2005/12/1 3:49
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/1/4
From:
Posts: 667
 Re: The Gay Invention
The homosexual semantics and sexual orientation terminology -- the Gay Invention -- changes the thinking and perceptions in regard to the created order of “male and female” as specifically taught in Scripture and understood for eons, as long as history is recorded.

The “sexual orientation” concept confuses the male/female teaching, obfuscating the issue of sexual behavior and conduct, alleging behavior and conduct is a function of one’s sexual orientation

The term “sexual orientation” leaps at us as a concept, saying in essence, we are no longer to be described as being male or female, we are described as heterosexuals and homosexuals, two major sub-classifications of male and female.

This is what is being taught to our children today, even to the point of encouraging young people to experiment with bisexual behavior to ascertain one’s sexual orientation.

The instruction of glbtq (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and those questioning) is twisted in a semantic collage with terms such as “human sexuality,” and “homophobia”.Homosexuality is juxtaposed with heterosexuality as a rationale to gain approval for homosexual conduct.

This controversial doctrine insists that sexual orientation is so profound it cannot be changed by the power of the individual’s will. The doctrine presupposes that even Christ’s call of repentance and confession cannot be meaningful since one’s sexual orientation is considered to be God’s “gift” and cannot be changed.

The language floods the schools, colleges, seminaries of the nation, where young minds are confronted by the new semantic and its implied psychic and moral meanings. Our leading thinkers have been swept into using these terms!

And here is the lie that causes the whole semantic rationale to fall when confronted by the truth of Christianity and the Scriptures.

Homosexuals with a will to change may change. That fact is proven. For the testament of Scripture is homosexuality is sin, that confession and repentance are required (1John 1:5-10).

The statement that the Holy Spirit is leading ECUSA to embrace the homosexual semantics is also an invention of Griswold, et al.
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/12/1 6:52  Updated: 2005/12/1 6:52
 Re: Smokin' Out The Gays...Pulling Them Out Of Their Cl
Joe,

I'm glad we're on the same page. Think how frustrated Jesus was with Peter, Thomas and a few other choice hooligans He surrounded Himself with - must have been totally exasperating - just like some of the *un-named hooligans* on VOL - I think you know who I mean

From the desk of the g-man
Causidicus
Posted: 2005/12/1 17:40  Updated: 2005/12/1 17:40
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/7/3
From:
Posts: 1094
 Re: The Gay Invention
Another casualty of the alleged "sexual revolution" sufaces: The English Language. Perhaps a new phrase is appropos: Acquired Language Deficiency Syndrome. (ALDS) It certainly fits the fractured jargon and loaded language coming from Club ECUSA's gleichgeschlechtlich minions.

C
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/12/1 19:28  Updated: 2005/12/1 19:28
 Re: The Gay Invention
Causidicus,

That's a great nomenclature you have shared - I'll remember it and use it in one of my toastmaster's speeches - LOVE IT!!!

Blessings,

g
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/12/1 22:41  Updated: 2005/12/1 22:41
 Re: The Gay Invention
It has occurred to me that I should add one thing to my prior post re. the language of our discourse:

Among the many, many things I am grateful to have learned from Essodalori over the last year or so is that our starting point in this debate must be the use of terms which are unflinchingly accurate in identifying what we oppose, for example, "homoanalfecalsodomy".
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/12/2 2:35  Updated: 2005/12/2 2:35
 Re: The Gay Invention
Stoneridge,

And here I thought it was "homoanalfecalrectalsodomaniacalcarnalism"

Awwww Rats!!!!!!!
Support VOL

Please support VirtueOnline with a tax deductible gift.


Your support of our ministry keeps the world informed with the truth!


   

VOL Sponsors



Global Anglican Theological Institute

Multi-Lingual Bible & Theological Education



GlobalAnglican.org
sponsored by VOL







St. Michael
the Archangel

Philadelphia, PA

http://www.anglicanphiladelphia.org

Traditional
Anglo-Catholic
Worship
for PA, NJ, DE

Worship at 8 & 10am
215 Belmont Ave
Bala Cynwyd, PA
215-247-1092
Anglican
Philadelphia.org



The Diocese of Quincy (ACNA)
Standing Together
Upholding the Faith

http://www.dioceseofquincy.org

We invite biblically orthodox, traditional churches beyond our borders to join our 132 year old diocese in planting new churches.

The Very Rev. John R. Spencer
President of the Standing Committee & Vicar General

St. Francis Church
12200 N. Brentfield Dr.
Dunlap, IL 61525
(309) 688-8221

DioceseOfQuincy.org



Contact Us for
advertising rates.