The Gay Invention
Homosexuality Is a Linguistic as Well as a Moral Error
by R. V. Young
Touchstone Magazine
For thousands of years, until the late 1800s, our ancestors were completely oblivious to the existence of a fundamentally distinct class of human beings. Indeed, during the long period of Greco-Roman antiquity and more than a millennium and a half of Christian civilization, man did not even have a name for this class.
Or so asserts an almost universal assumption fixed in the language almost everyone uses: that "heterosexuals" and "homosexuals" are two permanently and innately different kinds of human being, and that "sexual orientation" constitutes a difference comparable to the difference between male and female. Widespread acceptance of "homosexuality" and associated terms thus biases discussion of the subject before an argument is even formulated.
Terms Lacking
What might be called the philological evidence calls this notion into question. If it were true, someone would long ago have given this class a name. That no one did until very recently suggests that the notion is not true.
In the first footnote of the first chapter of Greek Homosexuality, which is generally regarded as the definitive treatment of its subject, Oxford classical scholar K. J. Dover points out that the ancient Greek language "has no nouns corresponding to the English nouns 'a homosexual' and 'a heterosexual'." Such an observation would seem to call for more notice than is accorded by a single short footnote, but even the apparent concession is misleading, insofar as it suggests that the absence of these terms is a peculiarity of Greek.
In fact, Latin also lacks these terms and the same is true of Old and Middle English. Among modern European languages the word that corresponds to the English "homosexual" is generally a variant on the same word: in Spanish homosexual and in Dutch homoseksueel, for example. German also offers gleichgeschlechtlich, which is simply a combination of two Germanic roots, gleich and Geschlecht, that correspond to the Greek ( homo = same) and Latin ( sexus = sex) of the English word.
This English word is itself a very recent coinage. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, both "homosexual" and "homosexuality" first appeared in English in 1892, along with "heterosexual" and "heterosexuality," in an English translation of Richard von Kraft-Ebing's Psychopathologia Sexualis (1886) and turn up again five years later in Havelock Ellis's Studies in the Psychology of Sex.
To read all of The Gay Invention, please click on the link below:
http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=18-10-036-f
--
R. V. Young is Professor of English at North Carolina State University. His most recent book is Doctrine and Devotion in Seventeenth-Century Poetry (Boydell & Brewer), and he is currently at work on a book on Shakespeare and on a translation and critical edition of the Flemish humanist Justus Lipsius’s De Constantia. He and his wife, who are parishioners at St. Joseph’s Catholic Church in Raleigh, have five grown children and eight grandchildren.
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2005/11/29 21:15 Updated: 2005/11/29 21:15 |
|
A noteworthy article. The pen is indeed mightier than the sword. He who controls the language of discourse will control the debate. Revolutionaries have long known this: the Bolsheviks, for example, claimed a name suggesting they were the majority when they were not. Do we call it "SDI" or "Star Wars"? Are our opponents "pro-choice" or "pro-abortion"? Which party's name has more mass-appeal: Republicans' of Democrats'? The list is endless, and too often the right is oblivious to the preemptive use of psycholinguistics.
What's in a name? Way too much. Since the Garden of Eden to name something was to have power over it. Until the Right learns to be more sophisticated in setting and using the terms of the debate, we will continue to fight with one arm tied behind our backs. |
|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2005/11/29 21:56 Updated: 2005/11/29 23:16 |
|
It is truly a good article for all to read. Long but worth the read. I have long wondered what's in a name as a child growing up, and now I know just how powerful it is, and how we can twist words to suit ourselves. Case in point the word "Homophobic" which means :
1. Fear of or contempt for lesbians and gay men. 2. Behavior based on such a feeling. I personally do not fear G&Ls and I suspect most people don't either. Seeing that G&Ls have used this word (fairly successfully) to drive fear into normal people and politicians so that they can get their way in society, I suggest we start using the word "Heterophobic" to use as a counter argument when we are labelled homophobic. Its only natural, since they fear our lifestyle. Arguments don't seem to get anywhere. After all it contrary to the normal lifestyle. BHTech |
|
| essodalori | Posted: 2005/11/29 22:02 Updated: 2005/11/29 22:03 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/9/15 From: Posts: 4904 |
Indeed, BHTech.
Homosexuals suffer from a severe psychological disorder known as opposite-sex-o-phobia - which renders them fearful and unable to naturally bind with the opposite sex, and which renders them incapable of recognizing that they are abnormal. It is a sorry disease which fortunately in many cases can be cured. With Christian love, Essodalori |
| gregory | Posted: 2005/11/29 22:43 Updated: 2005/11/30 13:05 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/8/4 From: Nflorida Posts: 4436 |
""It is truly a good article for all to read. Long but worth the read."" but i felt dirty/sick at points while reading the article.
"Until the Right learns to be more sophisticated in setting and using the terms of the debate, we will continue to fight with one arm tied behind our backs." Well stoneridge, i'd fight with "one arm tied..." alongside you but would try to remain quiet... Saving The Whole World With ![]() Matthew 27:2 |
| ConsProf | Posted: 2005/11/30 0:02 Updated: 2005/11/30 0:02 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/9/3 From: Edmond, OK Posts: 13 |
Excellent article. The discussion of the developement of the use of the term gender vs. sex was new to me and very interesting.
|
| Joe of the Mountain | Posted: 2005/11/30 0:23 Updated: 2005/11/30 0:23 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/1/3 From: Posts: 3472 |
Indeed BHTech. Thier use of language is innovative, persuasive and popular. The Right would rather start a fight over a word instead of use it effectively. Myself included... How to balance instruction with counter-propaganda?
|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2005/11/30 1:17 Updated: 2005/11/30 2:06 |
|
I concur with BHTech that maybe the time has come for the term of "Heterophobe" to be used as a tool in the combat against the pernicious revisionists who have infiltrated the Church.
Maybe some *shake and bake* expeditions(shake 'em up with some mortar rounds, bake them with white phosphorus) Just kidding ![]() ps. 'Tis out of Love that one should HATE homoerotic behavior and at the same time offer to guide the homosexual to acheiving release from the terrible ordeal he/she has put themselves in by their own volition. Think of becoming a *midwife* to help a homo/lesbo, or anyone else who suffers because of their sin, to give birth to their own faith. You yourself cannot give them faith, only God can, IF THEY wish to be healed of their sin-sick soul!!! Yea, to be a Christian is to be a midwife unto others. |
|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2005/11/30 5:05 Updated: 2005/11/30 5:05 |
|
a couple of alternate definitions
Ho·mo·pho·be 1. A person with an irrational fear of appearing passe or being viewed with contempt for not accepting homosexual behavior as normal. 2. A person who fears their homosexual activity being viewed as abnormal leading to the overwhelming need to force people to view their lifestyle as normal. Steven |
|
| Joe of the Mountain | Posted: 2005/12/1 2:21 Updated: 2005/12/1 2:21 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/1/3 From: Posts: 3472 |
Giovanni, I see you've learned the truly persuasive methods of small arms
It's a whole lot more effective than endless gibbering!But to your point, I've "converted" a number of garden variety liberals (straight, not gay), and it took several years of intense, long-term commitment and much frustration. I think it's like the cult deprogramming of the 1970s... but it works. |
| OtisPage | Posted: 2005/12/1 3:49 Updated: 2005/12/1 3:49 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/1/4 From: Posts: 667 |
The homosexual semantics and sexual orientation terminology -- the Gay Invention -- changes the thinking and perceptions in regard to the created order of “male and female” as specifically taught in Scripture and understood for eons, as long as history is recorded.
The “sexual orientation” concept confuses the male/female teaching, obfuscating the issue of sexual behavior and conduct, alleging behavior and conduct is a function of one’s sexual orientation The term “sexual orientation” leaps at us as a concept, saying in essence, we are no longer to be described as being male or female, we are described as heterosexuals and homosexuals, two major sub-classifications of male and female. This is what is being taught to our children today, even to the point of encouraging young people to experiment with bisexual behavior to ascertain one’s sexual orientation. The instruction of glbtq (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and those questioning) is twisted in a semantic collage with terms such as “human sexuality,” and “homophobia”.Homosexuality is juxtaposed with heterosexuality as a rationale to gain approval for homosexual conduct. This controversial doctrine insists that sexual orientation is so profound it cannot be changed by the power of the individual’s will. The doctrine presupposes that even Christ’s call of repentance and confession cannot be meaningful since one’s sexual orientation is considered to be God’s “gift” and cannot be changed. The language floods the schools, colleges, seminaries of the nation, where young minds are confronted by the new semantic and its implied psychic and moral meanings. Our leading thinkers have been swept into using these terms! And here is the lie that causes the whole semantic rationale to fall when confronted by the truth of Christianity and the Scriptures. Homosexuals with a will to change may change. That fact is proven. For the testament of Scripture is homosexuality is sin, that confession and repentance are required (1John 1:5-10). The statement that the Holy Spirit is leading ECUSA to embrace the homosexual semantics is also an invention of Griswold, et al. |
| Anonymous | Posted: 2005/12/1 6:52 Updated: 2005/12/1 6:52 |
|
Joe,
I'm glad we're on the same page. Think how frustrated Jesus was with Peter, Thomas and a few other choice hooligans He surrounded Himself with - must have been totally exasperating - just like some of the *un-named hooligans* on VOL - I think you know who I mean From the desk of the g-man ![]() |
|
| Causidicus | Posted: 2005/12/1 17:40 Updated: 2005/12/1 17:40 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/7/3 From: Posts: 1094 |
Another casualty of the alleged "sexual revolution" sufaces: The English Language. Perhaps a new phrase is appropos: Acquired Language Deficiency Syndrome. (ALDS) It certainly fits the fractured jargon and loaded language coming from Club ECUSA's gleichgeschlechtlich minions.
C |
| Anonymous | Posted: 2005/12/1 19:28 Updated: 2005/12/1 19:28 |
|
Causidicus,
That's a great nomenclature you have shared - I'll remember it and use it in one of my toastmaster's speeches - LOVE IT!!! Blessings, g |
|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2005/12/1 22:41 Updated: 2005/12/1 22:41 |
|
It has occurred to me that I should add one thing to my prior post re. the language of our discourse:
Among the many, many things I am grateful to have learned from Essodalori over the last year or so is that our starting point in this debate must be the use of terms which are unflinchingly accurate in identifying what we oppose, for example, "homoanalfecalsodomy". |
|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2005/12/2 2:35 Updated: 2005/12/2 2:35 |
|
Stoneridge,
And here I thought it was "homoanalfecalrectalsodomaniacalcarnalism" Awwww Rats!!!!!!! ![]() |
|












It's a whole lot more effective than endless gibbering!





