Register now for more content and features!!    Login   Home | News | FAQ | eBooks | Weblinks | Gallery | Contact Us
News Topics
Special Reports
Columnists
VirtueOnline
Search
VOL Sponsors

North American
Anglican


The Orthodox Journal for Anglicans in North America

Historical, Theological, Practical

39Articles.com



Land of a
Thousand Hills
Coffee


Drink Coffee
Do Good



Sustainable Ministry: Coffee, Community, Social Justice

DrinkCoffee
DoGood.com



Orthodox Anglican
Priest's Manual



Hardcover and Electronic copies available

OrthoChap.com


Contact Us for advertising rates.

Theology, Research ... : The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Posted by David Virtue on 2005/9/2 11:50:00 (12488 reads)

The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality

Hollywood and the media relentlessly propagate the image of the fit, healthy, and well-adjusted homosexual. The reality is at polar opposites to this caricature: homosexual and lesbian relationships are typically characterized by instability, promiscuity, and unhealthy and risky sex practices, factors that greatly increase the incidence of serious and incurable sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including hepatitis, HPV, syphilis, gonorrhea, and AIDS.

by Timothy J. Dailey, Ph. D.
Family Research Council
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS01B1

Homosexual activists attempt to portray their lifestyle as normal and healthy, and insist that homosexual relationships are the equivalent in every way to their heterosexual counterparts. Hollywood and the media relentlessly propagate the image of the fit, healthy, and well-adjusted homosexual. The reality is quite opposite to this caricature which was recently conceded by the homosexual newspaper New York Blade News: Reports at a national conference about sexually transmitted diseases indicate that gay men are in the highest risk group for several of the most serious diseases. . . . Scientists believe that the increased number of sexually tranmitted diseases (STD) cases is the result of an increase in risky sexual practices by a growing number of gay men who believe HIV is no longer a life-threatening illness.[1]

Instability and promiscuity typically characterize homosexual relationships. These two factors increase the incidence of serious and incurable stds. In addition, some homosexual behaviors put practitioners at higher risk for a variety of ailments, as catalogued by the following research data:

Risky Sexual Behavior on the Rise Among Homosexuals. Despite two decades of intensive efforts to educate homosexuals against the dangers of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and other stds, the incidence of unsafe sexual practices that often result in various diseases is on the rise.

· According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), from 1994 to 1997 the proportion of homosexuals reporting having had anal sex increased from 57.6 percent to 61.2 percent, while the percentage of those reporting "always" using condoms declined from 69.6 percent to 60 percent.[2]

· The CDC reported that during the same period the proportion of men reporting having multiple sex partners and unprotected anal sex increased from 23.6 percent to 33.3 percent. The largest increase in this category (from 22 percent to 33.3 percent) was reported by homosexuals twenty-five years old or younger.[3] Homosexuals Failing to Disclose Their HIV Status to Sex Partners

· A study presented July 13, 2000 at the XIII International aids Conference in Durban, South Africa disclosed that a significant number of homosexual and bisexual men with hiv "continue to engage in unprotected sex with people who have no idea they could be contracting HIV."[4] Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco found that thirty-six percent of homosexuals engaging in unprotected oral, anal, or vaginal sex failed to disclose that they were HIV positive to casual sex partners.[5]

· A CDC report revealed that, in 1997, 45 percent of homosexuals reporting having had unprotected anal intercourse during the previous six months did not know the HIV serostatus of all their sex partners. Even more alarming, among those who reported having had unprotected anal intercourse and multiple partners, 68 percent did not know the HIV serostatus of their partners.[6]

Young Homosexuals are at Increased Risk. Following in the footsteps of the generation of homosexuals decimated by AIDS, younger homosexuals are engaging in dangerous sexual practices at an alarming rate.

· A Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health study of three-hundred-sixty-one young men who have sex with men (MSM) aged fifteen to twenty-two found that around 40 percent of participants reported having had anal-insertive sex, and around 30 percent said they had had anal-receptive sex. Thirty-seven percent said they had not used a condom for anal sex during their last same-sex encounter. Twenty-one percent of the respondents reported using drugs or alcohol during their last same-sex encounter.[7]

· A five-year CDC study of 3,492 homosexual males aged fifteen to twenty-two found that one-quarter had unprotected sex with both men and women. Another CDC study of 1,942 homosexual and bisexual men with HIV found that 19 percent had at least one episode of unprotected anal sex--the riskiest sexual behavior--in 1998 and 1997, a 50 percent increase from the previous two years.[8]

Homosexual Promiscuity. Studies indicate that the average male homosexual has hundreds of sex partners in his lifetime:

· A.P. Bell and M.S. Weinberg, in their classic study of male and female homosexuality, found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent having 1,000 or more sex partners.[9]

· In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al., found that only 2.7 percent claimed to have had sex with one partner only. The most common response, given by 21.6 percent of the respondents, was of having a hundred-one to five hundred lifetime sex partners.[10]

· A survey conducted by the homosexual magazine Genre found that 24 percent of the respondents said they had had more than a hundred sexual partners in their lifetime. The magazine noted that several respondents suggested including a category of those who had more than a thousand sexual partners.[11]

· In his study of male homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, M. Pollak found that "few homosexual relationships last longer than two years, with many men reporting hundreds of lifetime partners."[12]

Promiscuity among Homosexual Couples. Even in those homosexual relationships in which the partners consider themselves to be in a committed relationship, the meaning of "committed" typically means something radically different from marriage.

· In The Male Couple, authors David P. McWhirter and Andrew M. Mattison reported that in a study of a hundred-fifty-six males in homosexual relationships lasting from one to thirty-seven years, Only seven couples have a totally exclusive sexual relationship, and these men all have been together for less than five years. Stated another way, all couples with a relationship lasting more than five years have incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity in their relationships.[13]

· In Male and Female Homosexuality, M. Saghir and E. Robins found that the average male homosexual live-in relationship lasts between two and three years.[14]

Unhealthy Aspects of "Monogamous" Homosexual Relationships. Even those homosexual relationships that are loosely termed "monogamous" do not necessarily result in healthier behavior.

· The journal AIDS reported that men involved in relationships engaged in anal intercourse and oral-anal intercourse with greater frequency than those without a steady partner.[15] Anal intercourse has been linked to a host of bacterial and parasitical sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS.

· The exclusivity of the relationship did not diminish the incidence of unhealthy sexual acts, which are commonplace among homosexuals. An English study published in the same issue of the journal AIDS concurred, finding that most "unsafe" sex acts among homosexuals occur in steady relationships.[16]

Human Papillomavirus (HPV). HPV is a collection of more than seventy types of viruses that can cause warts, or papillomas, on various parts of the body. More than twenty types of HPV are incurable STDs that can infect the genital tract of both men and women. Most HPV infections are subclinical or asymptomatic, with only one in a hundred people experiencing genital warts.

· HPV is "almost universal" among homosexuals. According to the homosexual newspaper The Washington Blade: "A San Francisco study of Gay and bisexual men revealed that HPV infection was almost universal among HIV-positive men, and that 60 percent of HIV-negative men carried HPV."[17]

· HPV can lead to anal cancer. At the recent Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Andrew Grulich announced that "most instances of anal cancer are caused by a cancer-causing strain of HPV through receptive anal intercourse. HPV infects over 90 percent of HIV-positive gay men and 65 percent of HIV-negative gay men, according to a number of recent studies."[18]

· The link between HPV and cervical cancer. Citing a presentation by Dr. Stephen Goldstone to the International Congress on Papillomavirus in Human Pathology in Paris, the Washington Blade reports that "HPV is believed to cause cervical cancer in women."[19]

Hepatitis: A potentially fatal liver disease that increases the risk of liver cancer.

· Hepatitis A: The Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report published by the CDC reports: "Outbreaks of hepatitis A among men who have sex with men are a recurring problem in many large cities in the industrialized world."[20]

· Hepatitis B: This is a serious disease caused by a virus that attacks the liver. The virus, which is called hepatitis B virus (HBV), can cause lifelong infection, cirrhosis (scarring) of the liver, liver cancer, liver failure, and death. Each year in the United States, more than 200,000 people of all ages contract hepatitis B and close to 5,000 die of sickness caused by AIDS. The CDC reports that MSM are at increased risk for hepatitis B.[21]

· Hepatitis C is an inflammation of the liver that can cause cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer. The virus can lie dormant in the body for up to thirty years before flaring up. Although less so than with hepatitis A and B, MSM who engage in unsafe sexual practices remain at increased risk for contracting hepatitis C.[22]

Gonorrhea: An inflammatory disease of the genital tract. Gonorrhea traditionally occurs on the genitals, but has recently appeared in the rectal region and in the throat. Although easily treated by antibiotics, according to the cdc only "about 50 percent of men have some signs or symptoms, and "many women who are infected have no symptoms of infection."[23] Untreated gonorrhea can have serious and permanent health consequences, including infertility damage to the prostate and urethra.

· A CDC report documents "significant increases during 1994 to 1997 in rectal gonorrhea . . . among MSM," indicating that "safe sex" practices may not be taken as seriously as the aids epidemic begins to slow.[24] In 1999 the CDC released data showing that male rectal gonorrhea is increasing among homosexuals amidst an overall decline in national gonorrhea rates. The report attributed the increase to a larger percentage of homosexuals engaging in unsafe sexual behavior.[25]

· The incidence of throat Gonorrhea is strongly associated with homosexual behavior. The Canadian Medical Association Journal found that "gonorrhea was associated with urethral discharge . . . and homosexuality (3.7 times higher than the rate among heterosexuals)."[26] Similarly, a study in the Journal of Clinical Pathology found that homosexual men had a much higher prevalence of pharyngeal (throat) gonorrhea--15.2 percent compared with 4.1 percent for heterosexual men.[27]

Syphilis: A venereal disease that, if left untreated, can spread throughout the body over time, causing serious heart abnormalities, mental disorders, blindness, and death. The initial symptoms of syphilis are often mild and painless, leading some individuals to avoid seeking treatment. According to the National Institutes of Health, the disease may be mistaken for other common illnesses: "syphilis has sometimes been called 'the great imitator' because its early symptoms are similar to those of many other diseases." Early symptoms include rashes, moist warts in the groin area, slimy white patches in the mouth, or pus-filled bumps resembling chicken pox.[28]

· According to the CDC, "transmission of the organism occurs during vaginal, anal, or oral sex."[29] In addition, the Archives of Internal Medicine found that homosexuals acquired syphilis at a rate ten times that of heterosexuals.[30]

· The CDC reports that those who contract syphilis face potentially deadly health consequences: "It is now known that the genital sores caused by syphilis in adults also make it easier to transmit and acquire HIV infection sexually. There is a two to five fold increased risk of acquiring hiv infection when syphilis is present."[31]

Gay Bowel Syndrome (GBS):[32] The Journal of the American Medical Association refers to GBS problems such as proctitis, proctocolitis, and enteritis as "sexually transmitted gastrointestinal syndromes."[33] Many of the bacterial and protozoa pathogens that cause gbs are found in feces and transmitted to the digestive system: According to the pro-homosexual text Anal Pleasure and Health, "[s]exual activities provide many opportunities for tiny amounts of contaminated feces to find their way into the mouth of a sexual partner . . . The most direct route is oral-anal contact."[34]

· Proctitis and Proctocolitis are inflammations of the rectum and colon that cause pain, bloody rectal discharge and rectal spasms. Proctitis is associated with STDs such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, and syphilis that are widespread among homosexuals.[35] The Sexually Transmitted Disease Information Center of the Journal of the American Medical Association reports that "[p]roctitis occurs predominantly among persons who participate in anal intercourse."

· Enteritis is inflammation of the small intestine. According to the Sexually Transmitted Disease Information Center of the Journal of the American Medical Association, "enteritis occurs among those whose sexual practices include oral-fecal contact."[36] Enteritis can cause abdominal pain, severe cramping, intense diarrhea, fever, malabsorption of nutrients, weight loss.[37] According to a report in The Health Implications of Homosexuality by the Medical Institute for Sexual Health, some pathogens associated with enteritis and proctocolitis [see below] "appear only to be sexually transmitted among men who have sex with men."[38]

HIV/AIDS Among Homosexuals. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is responsible for causing AIDS, for which there exists no cure.

· Homosexual men are the largest risk category. The CDC reports that homosexuals comprise the single largest exposure category of the more than 600,000 males with AIDS in the United States. As of December 1999, "men who have sex with men" and "men who have sex with men and inject drugs" together accounted for 64 percent of the cumulative total of male AIDS cases.[39]

· Women risk contracting HIV/AIDS through sexual relations with infected MSM. According to the CDC, "HIV infection among U.S. women has increased significantly over the last decade, especially in communities of color. cdc estimates that, in the United States, between 120,000 and 160,000 adult and adolescent females are living with HIV infection, including those with AIDS." In 1999, for example, most of the women (40 percent) reported with AIDS were infected through heterosexual exposure to HIV.[40] That number is actually higher, as "historically, more than two-thirds of AIDS cases among women initially reported without identified risk were later reclassified as heterosexual transmission."[41]

· Homosexuals with HIV are at increased risk for developing other life-threatening diseases. A paper delivered at the Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health reported that homosexual men with HIV have "a 37-fold increase in anal cancer, a 4-fold increase in Hodgkin's disease (cancer of the lymph nodes), a 2.7-fold increase in cancer of the testicles, and a 2.5 fold increase in lip cancer."[42] HIV/AIDS Among Young People

· AIDS incidence is on the rise among teens and young adults. The CDC reports that, "even though AIDS incidence (the number of new cases diagnosed during a given time period, usually a year) is declining, there has not been a comparable decline in the number of newly diagnosed HIV cases among youth.[43]

· Young homosexual men are at particular risk. The CDC estimates that "at least half of all new HIV infections in the United States are among people under twenty-five, and the majority of young people are infected sexually."[44] By the end of 1999, 29,629 young people aged thirteen to twenty-four were diagnosed with AIDS in the United States. MSM were the single largest risk category: in 1999, for example, 50 percent of all new AIDS cases were reported among young homosexuals.[45]

· Sexually active young women are also at risk. The CDC reports: "In 1999, among young women the same age, 47 percent of all AIDS cases reported were acquired heterosexually and 11 percent were acquired through injection drug use."

Homosexuals with STDs Are at an Increased Risk for HIV Infection. Studies of MSM treated in STD clinics show rates of infection as high as 36 percent in major cities.[46] A CDC study attributed the high infection rate to having high numbers of anonymous sex partners: "[S]yphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia apparently have been introduced into a population of MSM who have large numbers of anonymous partners, which can result in rapid and extensive transmission of STDs."[47] The CDC report concluded: "Persons with STDs, including genital ulcer disease and nonulcerative STD, have a twofold to fivefold increased risk for HIV infection."[48]

Anal Cancer: Homosexuals are at increased risk for this rare type of cancer, which is potentially fatal if the anal-rectal tumors metastasize to other bodily organs.

· Dr. Joel Palefsky, a leading expert in the field of anal cancer, reports that while the incidence of anal cancer in the United States is only 0.9/100,000, that number soars to 35/100,000 for homosexuals. That rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive, which, according to Dr. Palefsky, is "roughly ten times higher than the current rate of cervical cancer."[49]

· At the Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health in May, 2000, Dr. Andrew Grulich announced that the incidence of anal cancer among homosexuals with HIV "was raised 37-fold compared with the general population."[50] Lesbians are at Risk through Sex with MSM

· Many Lesbians also have had sex with men. The homosexual newspaper The Washington Blade, citing a 1998 study in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, reported that "the study's data confirmed previous scientific observations that most women who have sex with women also have had sex with men."[51] The study added that "sex with men in the prior year was common, as were sexual practices between female partners that possibly could transmit HPV."[52]

· Lesbians have more male sex partners that their heterosexual counterparts. A study of sexually transmitted disease among lesbians reviewed in The Washington Blade notes: "Behavioral research also demonstrates that a woman's sexual identity is not an accurate predictor of behavior, with a large proportion of 'lesbian' women reporting sex with (often high risk) men."[53] The study found that "the median number of lifetime male sexual partners was significantly greater for WSW (women who have sex with women) than controls (twelve partners versus six). WSW were significantly more likely to report more than fifty lifetime male sexual partners."[54]

· A study in the American Journal of Public Health concurs that bisexual women are at increased risk for contracting sexually transmitted diseases: "Our findings corroborate the finding that wsmw (women who have sex with men and women) are more likely than WSMO (women who have sex with men only) to engage in various high-risk behaviors" and also "to engage in a greater number of risk-related behaviors."[55] The study suggested that the willingness to engage in risky sexual practices "could be tied to a pattern of sensation-seeking behavior."[56]

· MSM spread HIV to women. A five-year study by the CDC of 3,492 homosexuals aged fifteen to twenty-two found that one in six also had sex with women. Of those having sex with women, one-quarter "said they recently had unprotected sex with both men and women." Nearly 7 percent of the men in the study were HIV positive."[57] "The study confirms that young bisexual men are a 'bridge' for HIV transmission to women," said the CDC.[58]

"Exclusive" Lesbian Relationships Also at Risk. The assumption that lesbians involved in exclusive sexual relationships are at reduced risk for sexual disease is false. The journal Sexually Transmitted Infections concludes: "The risk behavior profile of exclusive WSW was similar to all WSW."[59] One reason for this is because lesbians "were significantly more likely to report past sexual contact with a homosexual or bisexual man and sexual contact with an IDU (intravenous drug user)."[60]

Cancer Risk Factors for Lesbians. Citing a 1999 report released by the Institute of Medicine, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, the homosexual newspaper The Washington Blade notes that "various studies on Lesbian health suggest that certain cancer risk factors occur with greater frequency in this population. These factors include higher rates of smoking, alcohol use, poor diet, and being overweight."[61] Elsewhere the Blade also reports: "Some experts believe Lesbians might be more likely than women in general to develop breast or cervical cancer because a disproportionate number of them fall into high-risk categories."[62] Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among Lesbians

· In a study of the medical records of 1,408 lesbians, the journal Sexually Transmitted Infections found that women who have sexual relations with womenare at significantly higher risk for certain sexually transmitted diseases: "We demonstrated a higher prevalence of bv (bacterial vaginosis), hepatitis C, and HIV risk behaviors in WSW as compared with controls."[63]

Compulsive Behavior among Lesbians. A study published in Nursing Research found that lesbians are three times more likely to abuse alcohol and to suffer from other compulsive behaviors: "Like most problem drinkers, 32 (91 percent) of the participants had abused other drugs as well as alcohol, and many reported compulsive difficulties with food (34 percent), codependency (29 percent), sex (11 percent), and money (6 percent)." In addition, "Forty-six percent had been heavy drinkers with frequent drunkenness."[64] Alcohol Abuse Among Homosexuals and Lesbians

· The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychologists reports that lesbian women consume alcohol more frequently, and in larger amounts, than heterosexual women.[65] Lesbians were at significantly greater risk than heterosexual women for both binge drinking (19.4 percent compared to 11.7 percent), and for heavy drinking (7 percent compared to 2.7 percent).[66]

· Although the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychologists article found no significant connection between male homosexuals and alcohol abuse, a study in Family Planning Perspective concluded that male homosexuals were at greatly increased risk for alcoholism: "Among men, by far the most important risk group consisted of homosexual and bisexual men, who were more than nine times as likely as heterosexual men to have a history of problem drinking."[67] The study noted that problem drinking may contribute to the "significantly higher STD rates among gay and bisexual men."[68]

Violence in Lesbian and Homosexual Relationships.

· A study in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence examined conflict and violence in lesbian relationships. The researchers found that 90 percent of the lesbians surveyed had been recipients of one or more acts of verbal aggression from their intimate partners during the year prior to this study, with 31 percent reporting one or more incidents of physical abuse.[69]

· In a survey of 1,099 lesbians, the Journal of Social Service Research found that "slightly more than half of the [lesbians] reported that they had been abused by a female lover/partner. The most frequently indicated forms of abuse were verbal/emotional/psychological abuse and combined physical-psychological abuse."[70]

· In their book Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them: Battered Gay Men and Domestic Violence,D. Island and P. Letellier report that "the incidence of domestic violence among gay men is nearly double that in the heterosexual population."[71]

Compare the Low Rate of Intimate Partner Violence within Marriage. Homosexual and lesbian relationships are far more violent than are traditional married households:

· The Bureau of Justice Statistics (U.S. Department of Justice) reports that married women in traditional families experience the lowest rate of violence compared with women in other types of relationships.[72]

· A report by the Medical Institute for Sexual Health concurred,

It should be noted that most studies of family violence do not differentiate between married and unmarried partner status. Studies that do make these distinctions have found that marriage relationships tend to have the least intimate partner violence when compared to cohabiting or dating relationships.[73]

High Incidence of Mental Health Problems among Homosexuals and Lesbians. A national survey of lesbians published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology found that 75 percent of the nearly 2,000 respondents had pursued psychological counseling of some kind, many for treatment of long-term depression or sadness: Among the sample as a whole, there was a distressingly high prevalence of life events and behaviors related to mental health problems. Thirty-seven percent had been physically abused and 32 percent had been raped or sexually attacked. Nineteen percent had been involved in incestuous relationships while growing up. Almost one-third used tobacco on a daily basis and about 30 percent drank alcohol more than once a week; 6 percent drank daily. One in five smoked marijuana more than once a month. Twenty-one percent of the sample had thoughts about suicide sometimes or often and 18 percent had actually tried to kill themselves. . . . More than half had felt too nervous to accomplish ordinary activities at some time during the past year and over one-third had been depressed.[74]

Greater Risk for Suicide.

· A study of twins that examined the relationship between homosexuality and suicide, published in the Archives of General Psychiatry,found that homosexuals with same-sex partners were at greater risk for overall mental health problems, and were 6.5 times more likely than their twins to have attempted suicide. The higher rate was not attributable to mental health or substance abuse disorders.[75]

· Another study published simultaneously in Archives of General Psychiatry followed 1,007 individuals from birth. Those classified as "gay," lesbian, or bisexual were significantly more likely to have had mental health problems.[76] Significantly, in his comments on the studies in the same issue of the journal, D. Bailey cautioned against various speculative explanations of the results, such as the view that "widespread prejudice against homosexual people causes them to be unhappy or worse, mentally ill."[77]

Reduced Life Span. A study published in the International Journal of Epidemiology on the mortality rates of homosexualsconcluded that they have a significantly reduced life expectancy: In a major Canadian centre, life expectancy at age twentyfor gay and bisexual men is eight to twenty years less than for all men. If the same pattern of mortality were to continue, we estimate that nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently aged twenty years will not reach their sixty-fifth birthday. Under even the most liberal assumptions, gay and bisexual men in this urban centre are now experiencing a life expectancy similar to that experienced by all men in Canada in the year 1871.[78]

In 1995, long after the deadly effects of AIDS and other stds became widely known, homosexual author Urvashi Vaid expressed one of the goals of her fellow activists: "We have an agenda to create a society in which homosexuality is regarded as healthy, natural, and normal. To me that is the most important agenda item."[79] Debilitating illness, chronic disease, psychological problems, and early death suffered by homosexuals is the legacy of this tragically misguided activism, which puts the furthering of an "agenda" above saving the lives of those whose interests they purport to represent.

Those who advocate full acceptance of homosexual behavior choose to downplay the growing and incontrovertible evidence regarding the serious, life-threatening health effects associated with the homosexual lifestyle. Homosexual advocacy groups have a moral duty to disseminate medical information that might dissuade individuals from entering or continuing in an inherently unhealthy and dangerous lifestyle. Education officials in particular have a duty to provide information regarding the negative health effects of homosexuality to students in their charge, whose very lives are put at risk by engaging in such behavior. Above all, civil society itself has an obligation to institute policies that promote the health and well-being of its citizens. --

END

NOTES

1. Bill Roundy, "STD Rates on the Rise," New York Blade News, December 15, 2000, p. 1.
2. "Increases in Unsafe Sex and Rectal Gonorrhea among Men Who Have Sex with Men--San Francisco, California, 1994-1997," Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), January 29, 1999, p. 45.
3. Ibid. 4. Ulysses Torassa, "Some With HIV Aren't Disclosing Before Sex; UCSF Researcher's 1,397-person Study Presented During aids Conference," The San Francisco Examiner (July 15, 2000).
5. Jon Garbo, "Gay and Bi Men Less Likely to Disclose They Have HIV," GayHealth News (July 18, 2000). Available at: www.gayhealth.com/templates/0/news?record=136.
6. Ibid. 7. Jon Garbo, "Risky Sex Common Among Gay Club and Bar Goers," GayHealth News (January 3, 2001). Available at: www.gayhealth.com/templates/97863827496203.../ index.html?record=35.
8. "Bisexuals Serve as 'Bridge' Infecting Women With HIV," Reuters News Service (July 30, 2000). Available at: www.mb.com/ph/scty/2000%2D07/sc073004.asp. 9. A. P. Bell and M. S. Weinberg, Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1978), pp. 308,
9; see alsoBell, Weinberg and Hammersmith, Sexual Preference (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1981).
10. Paul Van de Ven et al., "A Comparative Demographic and Sexual Profile of Older Homosexually Active Men," Journal of Sex Research 34 (1997): 354. Dr. Paul Van de Ven reiterated these results in a private conversation with Dr. Robert Gagnon on September 7, 2000.
11. "Survey Finds 40 percent of Gay Men Have Had More Than 40 Sex Partners," Lambda Report, January/February 1998, p. 20.
12. M. Pollak, "Male Homosexuality," in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, edited by P. Aries and A. Bejin, pp. 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality (Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), pp. 124, 25.
13. David P. McWhirter and Andrew M. Mattison, The Male Couple: How Relationships Develop (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1984), pp. 252, 3.
14. M. Saghir and E. Robins, Male and Female Homosexuality (Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1973), p. 225; L.A. Peplau and H. Amaro, "Understanding Lesbian Relationships," in Homosexuality: Social, Psychological, and Biological Issues, edited byJ. Weinrich and W. Paul (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982). 15. A.P.M. Coxon et al., "Sex Role Separation in Diaries of Homosexual Men," AIDS, July 1993, pp. 877-882.
16. G. J. Hart et al., "Risk Behaviour, Anti-HIV and Anti-Hepatitis B Core Prevalence in Clinic and Non-clinic Samples of Gay Men in England, 1991-1992," AIDS, July 1993, pp. 863-869, cited in "Homosexual Marriage: The Next Demand," Position Analysis paper by Colorado for Family Values, May 1994.
17. Bill Roundy, "STDs Up Among Gay Men: CDC Says Rise is Due to HIV Misperceptions," The Washington Blade (December 8, 2000). Available at: www.washblade.com/health/a.
18. Richard A. Zmuda, "Rising Rates of Anal Cancer for Gay Men," Cancer News (August 17, 2000). Available at: cancerlinksusa.com/cancernews_sm/Aug2000 /081700analcancer.
19. "Studies Point to Increased Risks of Anal Cancer," The Washington Blade (June 2, 2000). Available at: www.washblade.com/health/000602hm.
20. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) September 4, 1998, p. 708.
21. "Viral Hepatitus B--Frequently Asked Questions," National Center for Infectious Diseases (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)September 29, 2000. Available at: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/b/faqb.
22. "Hepatitus C: Epidemiology: Transmission Modes" Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) 1998.Available at: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis /c/edu/1/default.htm.
23. "Gonorrhea," Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (Centers For Disease Control and Prevention) September, 2000. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchstp/dstd/ Fact_Sheets/FactsGonorrhea.htm.
24. "Increases in Unsafe Sex and Rectal Gonorrhea."
25. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) January 29, 1999, p. 48.
26. J. Vincelette et al., "Predicators of Chlamydial Infection and Gonorrhea among Patients Seen by Private Practitioners," Canadian Medical Association Journal 144 (1995): 713-721.
27. SPR Jebakumar et al., "Value of Screeningfor Oropharyngeal Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection," Journal of Clinical Pathology 48 (1995): 658-661.
28. "Some Facts about Syphilis," Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)October 1999. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchstp/dstd/ Fact_Sheets/Syphilis_Facts.
29. "Syphilis Elimination: History in the Making," Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)October 1999. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchstp/dstd/Fact_Sheets/Syphilis_Facts.
30. C. M. Hutchinson et al., "Characteristics of Patients with Syphilis Attending Baltimore STD Clinics," Archives of Internal Medicine 151 (1991): 511-516. 31. "Syphilis Elimination."
32. Homosexual advocates object to the use of this term (Gay Bowel Syndrome), which they say unfairly stigmatizes homosexual behavior. Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality (Austin: The Medical Institute for Sexual Health, 1999), p. 55.
33. "STD Treatment Guidelines: Proctitis, Proctocolitis, and Enteritis," (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) 1993. Available at: /www.ama-assn.org/special/std /treatmnt/guide/stdg3470.htm.
34. Jack Morin, Anal Pleasure and Health: A Guide for Men and Women (San Francisco: Down There Press, 1998), p. 220.
35. Health Implications, p. 56. 36. "STD Treatment Guidelines."
37. Health Implications; See Morin, Anal Pleasure and Health, p. 220, 1. 38. Health Implications. 39. "Table 9. Male Adult/Adolescent AIDS Cases by Exposure Category and Race/Ethnicity, Reported through December 1999, United States," Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention: available at: www/cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hasr1102/table9.
40. "HIV/AIDS Among US Women: Minority and Young Women at Continuing Risk," Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention (Centers for Disease Control)November 14, 2000. Available at: www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/women.
41. Ibid. 42. "Studies Point to Increased Risks of Anal Cancer."
43. "Young People at Risk: HIV/AIDS among America's Youth," Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention (Centers for Disease Control)November 14, 2000. Available at: www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/youth.htm.
44. Ibid.
45. Ibid.
46. "Need for Sustained HIV Prevention Among Men who Have Sex with Men," Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention (Centers for Disease Control)November 14, 2000. Available at: www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/msm.
47. "Resurgent Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease among Men Who Have Sex with Men--King County, Washington, 1997-1999," Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Centers for Disease Control, September 10, 1999, pp. 773-777. Available at: www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ mm4835a1.
48. "Need for Sustained HIV Prevention." 49. Bob Roehr, "Anal Cancer and You," Between the Lines News (November 16, 2000). Available at: www.pridesource.com/cgi-bin/article?article=3835560.
50. "Studies Point to Increased Risks of Anal Cancer."
51. Rhonda Smith, "HPV Can be Transmitted between Women," The Washington Blade (December 4, 1998). Available at: www.washblade.com/health/9901011h.
52. Ibid.
53. Katherine Fethers et al., "Sexually Transmitted Infections and Risk Behaviors in Women Who Have Sex with Women," Sexually Transmitted Infections 76 (2000):348.
54. Ibid., p. 347. 55. V. Gonzales, et al., "Sexual and Drug-Use Risk Factors for hiv and STDs: A Comparison of Women with and without Bisexual Experiences," American Journal of Public Health 89 (December 1999): 1846.
56. Ibid.
57. "Bisexuals Serve as 'Bridge' Infecting Women with HIV," Reuters News Service (July 30, 2000).
58. Ibid.
59. "Sexually Transmitted Infections," p. 347.
60. Ibid.
61. Rhonda Smith, "Childbirth Linked with Smaller Breast Tumor Size," The Washington Blade (December 17, 1999). Available at: www.washblade.com/health/000114lh.
62. "HPV can be Transmitted between Women."
63. Katherine Fethers et al., "Sexually Transmitted Infections and Risk Behaviors in Women Who Have Sex with Women," Sexually Transmitted Infections, July 2000, p. 345.
64. Joanne Hall, "Lesbians Recovering from Alcoholic Problems: An Ethnographic Study of Health Care Expectations," Nursing Research 43 (1994): 238-244.
65. Peter Freiberg, "Study: Alcohol Use More Prevelent for Lesbians," The Washington Blade, January 12, 2001, p. 21.
66. Ibid.
67. Karen Paige Erickson, Karen F. Trocki, "Sex, Alcohol and Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A National Survey," Family Planning Perspectives 26 (December 1994): 261.
68. Ibid.
69. Lettie L. Lockhart et al., "Letting out the Secret: Violence in Lesbian Relationships," Journal of Interpersonal Violence 9 (December 1994): 469-492.
70. Gwat Yong Lie and Sabrina Gentlewarrier, "Intimate Violence in Lesbian Relationships: Discussion of Survey Findings and Practice Implications," Journal of Social Service Research 15 (1991): 41-59.
71. D. Island and P. Letellier, Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them: Battered Gay Men and Domestic Violence (New York: Haworth Press, 1991), p. 14.
72. "Violence Between Intimates," Bureau of Justice Statistics Selected Findings, November 1994, p. 2.
73. Health Implications, p. 79.
74. J. Bradford, et al., "National Lesbian Health Care Survey: Implications for Mental Health Care," Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62 (1994): 239, cited in Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality, p. 81.
75. R. Herrell, et al., "A Co-Twin Study in Adult Men," Archives of General Psychiatry 56 (1999): 867-874.
76. D. Fergusson, et al., "Is Sexual Orientation Related to Mental Health Problems and Suicidality in Young People?" Archives of General Psychiatry 56 (October 1999), p. 876-884.
77. Ibid. 78. Robert S. Hogg et al., "Modeling the Impact of HIV Disease on Mortality in Gay and Bisexual Men," International Journal of Epidemiology 26 (1997): 657.
79. Quoted in Gabriel Rotello, Sexual Ecology: AIDS and the Destiny of Gay Men (New York: Penguin Books, 1997), p. 286.

Social Bookmarking
Bookmark to: Favit Bookmark to: Digg Bookmark to: Del.icio.us Bookmark to: Facebook Bookmark to: Reddit Bookmark to: StumbleUpon Bookmark to: Furl Bookmark to: Google Bookmark to: Yahoo Bookmark to: Technorati Information        
Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Poster Thread
Causidicus
Posted: 2005/9/2 19:12  Updated: 2005/9/2 19:12
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/7/3
From:
Posts: 1095
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Rom 6:23
essodalori
Posted: 2005/9/2 19:38  Updated: 2005/9/2 20:02
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/9/15
From:
Posts: 4904
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
First, anytime you degrade yourself by messing around with other men's rectums, anuses and feces, you're going to get sick. According to the CDC (and many other surveys), 2/3 of homomen engage in anal sex; 1/3 engage in activities like anal licking and oral sodomy following anal sodomy, in which fecal matter is ingested. Sickness of the soul begets sickness of the mind begets sickness of the body - and vice versa.

Second, males are naturally promiscuous, and drawn to sexual wantonness. In the Godly plan for males, the male sacrifices his sexually wanton desires for the love and respect and faithfulness of a woman, for her willingness to bear their children, whom they raise together in love. Absent Godly obedience or woman, as with most homosexual men, you almost always get promiscuity and wantonness, beccause there is no brake on their naturally wanton sexual desires. That's why homosexual men are always on the prowl at highway reststops, and in the parks and on the beaches and so forth. That's why homosexual men are rarely 'faithful' to each other for any length of time, and that's partly why homosexual relationships are rarely long-lived. That's why the average homosexual male has hundreds of sexual partners in a lifetime, many of whom are completely anonymous. And finally, when you combine filthy and unnatural sexual practices with promiscuity, you get a health disaster. Which is why over 2/3 of all AIDs cases in the US involve men who engage in homosexual or bisexual acts, when they constitute a couple percent of the male population. And that's why the average male homosexual has two or more venereal diseases. And that's why a male who engages in homosexual acts is 19 times more likely to have an STD than a sexually normal male. And all of this is in large part why the average homosexual (and this includes lesbians too) live far shorter lives on average than people who don't engage in such unnatural and deviant sexual acts.

And that's why, if there had not been a hurricane in New Orleans, you would have seen thousands of homosexual men parading around with their flies unzipped and engaging in all sorts of sexual promiscuity and degradation at one of their yearly bashes in that city.

No true good comes from sexual sin of any sort (and from not listening to God). Only the blind cannot see that.

Finally, all that sexual degradation degrades the soul and endangers eternal life with God. That's the saddest part.

With Christian love,

Essodalori
essodalori
Posted: 2005/9/2 20:07  Updated: 2005/9/2 20:08
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/9/15
From:
Posts: 4904
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Once you tell yourself, by thumbing your nose at God, that sex has nothing (nothing!) to do with the combining of man and woman in marriage, and the begetting and rearing of children, you are on the path to sexual degradation, sexual selfishness, sin, promiscuity, disease, death, and soul death.

That's what society sells our children today. It's poison - both in this world and with regard to the next.

With Christian love,

Essodalori
gregory
Posted: 2005/9/2 20:07  Updated: 2005/9/2 20:07
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/8/4
From: Nflorida
Posts: 4436
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Yo david virtue, you did see that i posted that link, huh?

Note i am posting better...

Amazing Grace, gregory


Click here to see that lil' i provided this link
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/2 20:49  Updated: 2005/9/2 20:49
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
When Jesus was on Earth He went from village to village, meeting sick people and making them well.

Today, Homosexuals meet healthy people and leave them sick.

Don

Think about it until you actually understand what I say. Think about it.
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/2 23:28  Updated: 2005/9/2 23:28
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Esso and Gregory: What this article says, you have been posting for months - same language too - and you both take a lot of heat for it - keep up the good work guys -
bcwright
Posted: 2005/9/3 0:47  Updated: 2005/9/3 0:49
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/7/4
From:
Posts: 528
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
I would point out that most of the health problems mentioned here are more the result of promiscuity and risky sexual practices (anal sex, oral/anal contact, etc) than of homosexuality as such. Granted that promiscuity has historically been almost universally associated with homosexuality - but many of these same health problems can affect heterosexuals who engage in highly promiscuous behaviour. For example, a significant portion of the AIDS problem in Africa appears to stem from heterosexual promiscuity, in addition to unsanitary medical practices (re-use of needles, etc).

Historically of course both practices (homosexuality and promiscuity) have been condemned by the Church. However I do not think that the litmus test for whether a specific act should be considered a sin should depend merely on whether there are negative health consequences. I'm a bit afraid that this article tries to do so - in effect turning the issue of sin into a question of medicine. To give a couple of examples, the sins of pride and hypocrisy could hardly be considered to have negative health consequences but are nevertheless serious sins. Or on the other hand, caring for the sick can often expose the caregiver to the disease(s) afflicting the patient(s) - and surely caring for the sick should be considered a virtue!

From a Christian point of view, at best this article can provide secular (non-religious) reasons for avoiding both homosexuality and promiscuity. Although that can provide important debating points in the current social climate, in the final analysis the Church's position must be governed by her understanding of God's Word.
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/3 1:00  Updated: 2005/9/3 1:00
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Essodalori, you're right again......as you usually are!
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/3 1:02  Updated: 2005/9/3 1:02
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Essodalori, BTW: I changed my email address and re-registered. Also changed my username from kennjon to kennjones.
essodalori
Posted: 2005/9/3 1:10  Updated: 2005/9/3 1:10
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/9/15
From:
Posts: 4904
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
"From a Christian point of view, at best this article can provide secular (non-religious) reasons for avoiding both homosexuality and promiscuity. Although that can provide important debating points in the current social climate, in the final analysis the Church's position must be governed by her understanding of God's Word."

---

Yes, indeed, bcwright. These arguments are necessary for non-Christians to see why it makes sense that God would prohibit such practices. There are far deeper religious and Godly ones, but unless you believe in God and believe Him, and understand Christ, it will be hard to understand them.

Very good point.

With much Christian love,

Essodalori
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/3 1:25  Updated: 2005/9/3 1:25
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Taken together, God's Word, and that of the medical profession, should serve as proof of what the Conservatives of the Church have been saying all along about this subject. Need we say more?
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/3 5:31  Updated: 2005/9/3 5:31
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
GET OUT OF YOUR HEADS AND INTO YOUR HEARTS!!! (please).

The statistics for heterosexuals are appalling as well, folks! Why???? Because MEN are promiscuous!

We are all people, God loves us all, regardless of what one's religeon, sexual orientation, etc.

Something I must point out about statistics...they can be easily manipulated to fit one's view. People of both sides of this issue do this! (But, politicians are the true experts!)

Now, the data one might find throughout this country on gay male promiscuity, and not just the gay mecca centers of the country, like San Francisco, would be a bit different from the statistics you used here. It is a fact that there is more gay male promiscuity in areas like San Francisco.

You cannot dispute that the cause of women, in general, (not just lesbians) contracting HIV is through sexual contact with MEN...heterosexual sex.

Promiscuity throughout the ages has been linked to male behavior, not just gay or bisexual male behavior.

Where are your statistics for heterosexual male promiscuity...why not do a comparative study???

I happen to know that risky behaviors are of a concern of the CDC's in peoples of all sexualities, not just gay men.

Just as the cause for concern about the integrity of the traditional family has to do with the immoral and promiscuous lifestyle of heterosexuals, of our society overall, not of sexual minorities. Divorce rates are astronomical, extended families the norm, for a reason and it's not because of what gay people do in bed...Get my point?

Jesus = Compassion, not Judgement, folks!
shytech74
Posted: 2005/9/3 9:30  Updated: 2005/9/3 9:30
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/4/23
From: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1054
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
The statistics for heterosexuals are appalling as well, folks! Why???? Because MEN are promiscuous!

We are all people, God loves us all, regardless of what one's religeon, sexual orientation, etc.
quote by anonymous
-----------------------------------------------------

okay.....

So ALL men are included in your assessment (judgement)? I see....you happen to know a lot it seems....how's about telling us your name/credentials/background.

Oh...that's what I thought...well see ya stranger...
essodalori
Posted: 2005/9/3 10:40  Updated: 2005/9/3 10:42
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/9/15
From:
Posts: 4904
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
"Jesus = Compassion, not Judgement, folks!"

---

No, you're wrong, anonymous.

Jesus = love AND judgment. He WILL judge you, and you will be wheat or chaff. He tells us so himself. And his Father tells us the same.

If you're smart, you'll be wheat. I tell you that out of love.

With much Christian love!

Essodalori
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/3 12:26  Updated: 2005/9/3 12:26
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Jesus is the most compassionate person ever. I agree.

He said to NOT be promiscuous.

I've done my part. What are you willing to do?

Don
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/3 12:40  Updated: 2005/9/3 12:40
 litmus test for whether a specific act should be considered a sin
"litmus test for whether a specific act should be considered a sin "

Absolutely right!

Back in the early 1960s liberal congregations were advising their youth not to fool around as an unwanted pregnancy might result. More orthodox congregations just said to honor God with your bodies and with your thoughts. When birth control came, which of the afformentioned groups of youth became promiscuous?

We obey God because we want to please Him, not because we think we understand a thing.

Even if tomorrow Homosexuality became totally healthy, christians would abstain.

Don
essodalori
Posted: 2005/9/3 13:47  Updated: 2005/9/3 13:47
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/9/15
From:
Posts: 4904
 Re: litmus test for whether a specific act should be conside
"We obey God because we want to please Him, not because we think we understand a thing."

---

Indeed, Gander. But it is always true that the more we obey Him out of love, the more we come to understand.

It's as St. Augustine said: "Understanding is the reward of faith."

With much Christian love!

Essodalori
Orthodox1
Posted: 2005/9/3 16:09  Updated: 2005/9/3 16:09
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2005/8/24
From:
Posts: 35
 In re: Anonymous
Sounds like Anonymous is a pen name for "Father Steve" or one of his buddies.

Anonymous, further reminds me of those homosexuals who in the late 1990s disturbed the service at St. Patrick's Cathedral in NYC and threw condoms at the Cardinal, calling him a "bigot."

This theology of "Jesus is Love" is not just Christianity lite; it is the mantra of the homosexual movement.

But how do the homos react to the following scripture citations which specifically condemn homo acts, or describe marriage between a man and a woman as normative:

Matthew 19: 4-5
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Romans 1:24-27
Leviticus 18:22
1 Timothy 1:8-11

And let's not forget about Genesis either!
gatekeeper
Posted: 2005/9/3 16:23  Updated: 2005/9/3 16:30
Quite a regular
Joined: 2005/5/3
From: Texas
Posts: 59
 Re: litmus test for whether a specific act should be conside
bcwright says, "However I do not think that the litmus test for whether a specific act should be considered a sin should depend merely on whether there are negative health consequences." bc then cites the example of a caregiver becoming afflicted with his patient's disease.

bcwright is correct that harmful consequences are not the defining aspect of sin (we have Scripture for that), but I suggest it is a highly reliable indicator. Most (dare I suggest all?) sin results in adverse physical or mental health consequences for either the sinner or the one sinned against. Our loving God, like any good father, desiring the best for his children warns against committing sin because of its resultant harmful consequences. Do you not see even the harmful consequences of pride and hypocrisy? How many believers render themselves ineffective witnesses to the unsaved by exhibiting pride or failing to live up to their own (and Christ's) standards thus opening themselves to the legitimate charge of hypocrisy? I know an unbeliever who excuses his lack of commitment because he views (correctly or not) so many religious hypocrites in the church.

Let us not fall into the trap of thinking that God promises us health, wealth, and well-being if we follow his commandments in this life. Christ calls his children to follow his path of self-sacrifice. This covers the case of the health provider falling to his patient's disease or the missionary losing his life to violent persecutors antagonistic to the gospel. Here the adverse consequences are the risks we choose to accept from a desire to do good, not the natural (by natural law, unavoidable?) out working of sinful actions.

These considerations are limited to this current world and do not even consider God's eventual judgment of all sin. Considering only the greater good of all mankind should lead us to avoid harmful, sinful actions and choose to do good. Darn that fallen nature impediment!

Regarding The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality itself, I have not before encountered such a stunningly compelling indictment of homosexuality from the sole stand point of natural adverse consequences. Many thanks and congratulations to Dr. Timothy Dailey.
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/3 16:43  Updated: 2005/9/3 16:43
 Re: litmus test for whether a specific act should be conside
I do agree. there is no doubt about it that obedience yields understanding. I would contend, however, that we never know EVERYTHING about anything. This is the reason for faith.

Don
Caroll
Posted: 2005/9/4 1:18  Updated: 2005/9/4 1:18
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/2/22
From:
Posts: 289
 Re: litmus test for whether a specific act should be conside
This should be required reading at the St. Andrews school in Texas and every other Episcopal school and seminary too! I wonder if any of the students came over to read it, as I think it was referred to in one of the many posts.
Carol
Chris2
Posted: 2005/9/4 12:13  Updated: 2005/9/4 12:13
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2005/7/20
From:
Posts: 135
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Homo sex is just one of a multitude of sexual addictions. All addictions are perilous to the spiritual health of the individual and of mankind. Homo sex, however, is probably the most unsanitary and unhealthy of the behaviors that a person can indulge in.
RCRIII
Posted: 2005/9/4 15:46  Updated: 2005/9/4 15:48
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2004/3/24
From:
Posts: 119
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
I agree. This article should be required reading at this Episcopal school- and every office at 815.

Why, considering all of the medical facts- not to mention the sheer scandal of it all- do we as a society "tolerate" what nature doesn't?
essodalori
Posted: 2005/9/4 15:49  Updated: 2005/9/4 15:49
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/9/15
From:
Posts: 4904
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
"Why, considering all of the medical facts- not to mention the sheer scandal of it all- do we as a society "tolerate" what nature doesn't?"

---

Because we exchanged love (and the inevitable persecution) for tolerance and unlove.

We are the generation where the 'love of many will grow cold.'

With much Christian love,

Essodalori
RCRIII
Posted: 2005/9/4 15:56  Updated: 2005/9/4 15:59
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2004/3/24
From:
Posts: 119
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Esso, you have a gift for succinctness that I envy. What you said here about the "path to degradation, sexual selfishness, sin, promiscuity, disease, and soul death" is clear and true.

In the Middle Ages, they used to refer to homosexuality as "inversion," because it was a failure of a person to be completed in his identity. As such, a homosexual (active) turns in on himself- a narcissism born of malformity.
Salticus
Posted: 2005/9/4 20:27  Updated: 2005/9/4 20:27
Just popping in
Joined: 2005/1/8
From: Granite City, Taxachusetts
Posts: 19
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
"Anon" perhaps needs to try a bit of what business-school weenies call "cost-benefit analysis". If he did, he would note one outstanding problem with his argument. It's simply this: heterosex has one benefit which outweighs its problems, as far as society is concerned, namely the continuing existance of the species. This benefit dwarfs the costs, such as disease. Homosex, on the other hand, provides not the slightest public benefit, so the costs, even were they the same, would ensure than any sane society would regard it with, at best, hostile tolerance (viz., "don't ask, don't tell"). And it doesn't matter here if the statistics are manipulated, since the social cost is still non-negligible, and the benefits are still nil.

Of course the negligence of conservatives regarding male promiscuity isn't exactly without cost; as our Piskie conservatives don't give a hoot about the few singles who show up to their churches, they are part of the problem, not part of the solution. Long observation has convinced me that a lot of the problem is what is known as "any port in a storm", viz. someone does what they can because they can't do what they would prefer. Negligence doesn't help the situation.

"Jesus = Compassion, not Judgement, folks!" Consequences don't care how compassionate or well-meaning we are, only what we do, and narcissism is deadly, whether hetero or homo. At least if the culture collapses we'll be able to say that we meant well, eh?
Orthodox1
Posted: 2005/9/4 21:32  Updated: 2007/10/28 20:39
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2005/8/24
From:
Posts: 35
 Here's Ratzinger's Take on Homosexuality -- Circa 1986
http://tinyurl.com/4rsyc

Very informative document -- describes how to deal with the depravity of homosexuality, compassionately, yet in truth. Also discusses how the homosexuals have been 'relentlessly' pursuing their agenda to undermine the Christian view of sodomy.
gregory
Posted: 2005/9/5 13:50  Updated: 2005/9/5 13:51
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/8/4
From: Nflorida
Posts: 4436
 Re: Here's Ratzinger's Take on Homosexuality -- Ci
Orthox1, yes that is a very good article and i am compelled to a partial quote:

""It has been argued that the homosexual orientation in certain cases is not the result of deliberate choice; and so the homosexual person would then have no choice but to behave in a homosexual fashion. Lacking freedom, such a person, even if engaged in homosexual activity, would not be culpable.

Here, the Church's wise moral tradition is necessary since it warns against generalizations in judging individual cases. In fact, circumstances may exist, or may have existed in the past, which would reduce or remove the culpability of the individual in a given instance; or other circumstances may increase it. What is at all costs to be avoided is the unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behaviour of homosexual persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable. What is essential is that the fundamental liberty which characterizes the human person and gives him his dignity be recognized as belonging to the homosexual person as well. As in every conversion from evil, the abandonment of homosexual activity will require a profound collaboration of the individual with God's liberating grace.




12. What, then, are homosexual persons to do who seek to follow the Lord? Fundamentally, they are called to enact the will of God in their life by joining whatever sufferings and difficulties they experience in virtue of their condition to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross. That Cross, for the believer, is a fruitful sacrifice since from that death come life and redemption. While any call to carry the cross or to understand a Christian's suffering in this way will predictably be met with bitter ridicule by some, it should be remembered that this is the way to eternal life for all who follow Christ.

It is, in effect, none other than the teaching of Paul the Apostle to the Galatians when he says that the Spirit produces in the lives of the faithful "love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, trustfulness, gentleness and self-control" (5:22) and further (v. 24), "You cannot belong to Christ unless you crucify all self-indulgent passions and desires."

It is easily misunderstood, however, if it is merely seen as a pointless effort at self-denial. The Cross is a denial of self, but in service to the will of God himself who makes life come from death and empowers those who trust in him to practise virtue in place of vice.

To celebrate the Paschal Mystery, it is necessary to let that Mystery become imprinted in the fabric of daily life. To refuse to sacrifice one's own will in obedience to the will of the Lord is effectively to prevent salvation. Just as the Cross was central to the expression of God's redemptive love for us in Jesus, so the conformity of the self-denial of homosexual men and women with the sacrifice of the Lord will constitute for them a source of self-giving which will save them from a way of life which constantly threatens to destroy them.

Christians who are homosexual are called, as all of us are, to a chaste life. As they dedicate their lives to understanding the nature of God's personal call to them, they will be able to celebrate the Sacrament of Penance more faithfully and receive the Lord's grace so freely offered there in order to convert their lives more fully to his Way.""
this is only part of this short read

Click here for ' ON THE PASTORAL CARE OF HOMOSEXUAL PERSONS
kglenmark
Posted: 2005/9/5 14:50  Updated: 2005/9/5 14:50
Just popping in
Joined: 2005/8/15
From:
Posts: 12
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
As a physician, specialist in public health and infectious diseases myself I find the report truthful in regards to the risks of STD's but a bit distorted and biased when it comes to the point of stating that homosexuality in itself is a risk factor in the spreading of infectious diseases, this has no scientific basis whatsoever. It is not sexual orientation per se what increases the possibility of being infected and/or infecting others with sexually-transmitted diseases, it is the multiplicity of sexual partners what increases the risk,and this applies equally to both homosexual or heterosexual individuals. The report also suggests that homosexuals tend to be more promiscuous than heterosexuals, well, this can be subject of debate. All that list of pathologies can be present in both heterosexual and homosxual individuals. I have heyerosexual patients who are in permament relationships (at least in paper) yet they come to me with symptoms and signs of venereal diseases, at the same time I have same-sex couples who have never had any history of STD's. To be honest, I found raally dubious reports which are put together by people who used scientific data to construct a distorted version of reality. I think this report has a bit of a spin against a defined social group, and that it not what science is all about, science is about facts, real facts, not presumptions or easy conclusions.
Orthodox1
Posted: 2005/9/5 16:02  Updated: 2005/9/5 16:02
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2005/8/24
From:
Posts: 35
 Re: Here's Ratzinger's Take on Homosexuality -- Ci
Gregory,

Excellent citation from the text.

Would that we evangelical/orthodox Episcopalians could produce such a statement -- as Ratzinger did -- and make it a pastoral recommendation as well.

That would help rebut the false charge of "homophobe" that seems to be bandied about -- as if it were the real problem in the gay sex controversy.

I have never met a conservative Episcopalian priest who was "phobic" over gays...just those who are bible-based and concerned about their souls.

We should put it in writing.
Orthodox1
Posted: 2005/9/5 16:04  Updated: 2005/9/5 16:04
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2005/8/24
From:
Posts: 35
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Doctor,

Where did you receive your M.D.? What is your speciality? Where do you practice medicine?
PRISCA
Posted: 2005/9/5 20:42  Updated: 2005/9/5 20:43
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/8/3
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 269
 Re: Here's Ratzinger's Take on Homosexuality -- Ci
Yes, the Ratzinger article is very sound.

Being written some years ago, it could usefully be updated with (1) citations from the Fathers, i.e. the earliest form of 'tradition'
(2) the truth that the Lord Himself in the days of His flesh did indeed have something (adverse) to say cf. http://www.nwnet.org/~prisca/Brief.htm and the sources cited there
(3) a fresh biblical allusion in the shape of the tendentious mistranslation of Ez 16:28 in the Old Greek (written c. 150-50 BC).

Point (3) comes straight out of my Oxford dissertation and is original to me.
Orthodox1
Posted: 2005/9/5 21:03  Updated: 2005/9/5 21:03
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2005/8/24
From:
Posts: 35
 Re: Here's Ratzinger's Take on Homosexuality -- Ci
Just read the link you provided. Excellent point,
"No argument for the goodness and beauty of same-sex physical relations can be made on Scriptural grounds which does not apply equally to, say, child-molestation, incest, adultery and so forth."

In other words, anything purporting to come from Scripture to endorse gay sex is false exegesis -- probably willingly false.

The problem with all of this, however, is that even though we have Scripture, Tradition, and even modern science on our side, the revisionists will hear nothing of it, for they do not deal in good faith.
PRISCA
Posted: 2005/9/5 21:46  Updated: 2005/9/5 21:46
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/8/3
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 269
 Re: Here's Ratzinger's Take on Homosexuality -- Ci
Thankyou, Orthodox1.

I think of the really salient point of that Brief as being a refutation of the "Jesus said nothing" argument. This seems to have been until recently a blind spot in all conservative thinking.
dvirtue
Posted: 2005/9/6 19:25  Updated: 2005/9/6 19:25
Webmaster
Joined: 2004/1/2
From:
Posts: 175
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Cute link

David W. Virtue DD
essodalori
Posted: 2005/9/6 19:38  Updated: 2005/9/6 19:38
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/9/15
From:
Posts: 4904
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
The reason that homosexual men are nineteen times more likely to carry an STD, and why the average homosexual man has two of them, and why the homoteen who becomes sexually active will likely get AIDs in his twenties are twofold:

1) The rectum is not designed for sexual penetration the way a woman's sexual organ is, and tearing in the anal tract vastly increases the likelihood of the spread of disease;

2) Men are naturally promiscuous creatures who do not need emotional connection of any sort to get enjoyment and pleasure from sex. With natural male/female pairing, the woman acts as a brake on the man, and will rarely countenance infidelity. With two men, who are both naturally promiscuous creatures, it's just off to the races.

Men are not made to copulate with men, physically, emotionally, psychologically, or of course, by God.

With much Christian love,

Essodalori
PRISCA
Posted: 2005/9/6 21:45  Updated: 2005/9/6 21:45
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/8/3
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 269
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Dear Orthodox1,

I did not find your address to kglenmark super-courteous, I have to say. He/she had already stated plainly his/her specialisations; and if, given the conservative nature of his/her other posts, he/she prefers to preserve his/her privacy in respect of his/her location and professional training, obvious clues to his/her identity, one must surely respect that desire.

I for one am interested in learning what authorities he/she can quote for the reservations which he/she has expressed. "Lies, damned lies and statistics", after all!
Orthodox1
Posted: 2005/9/7 15:21  Updated: 2005/9/7 15:21
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2005/8/24
From:
Posts: 35
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Thanks for your observation; perhaps you are correct.

I should have put the question as, "what evidence do you have to support your claims?"

We are well past the stage in our society where one can simply claim that they are an authority -- e.g. a physician -- and not back it up with specific information to support a claim.

I found the posting to be missing that, and the assertion that science is based on "facts" was LOL funny to me, as it is surely based on interpretation of facts.
PRISCA
Posted: 2005/9/7 21:28  Updated: 2005/9/7 21:28
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/8/3
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 269
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
What I did find unsatisfactory about the good doctor's post was (1) the equation of 'orientation' with observable behaviour (the overlap is often very small, not least because a same-sex 'orientation' is by no means always acted out) and (2) the use of anecdotal 'evidence' i.e. the "one swallow makes a summer" principle. I need to hear of major, large-scale studies.
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/7 21:42  Updated: 2005/9/7 21:42
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Fecal Homosodomania and AIDS is the Black Plague of our times. When will the awry repent of their sins of commission and receive the healing mercy of the Lamb of God that takest away the sins of the world???

wagnertuba
Orthodox1
Posted: 2005/9/10 12:30  Updated: 2005/9/10 12:30
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2005/8/24
From:
Posts: 35
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Indeed.

I have read that the American Psychiatric Association has reported that there has never been a replicable study showing a biological/genetic basis for homosexual orientation.

I have also read that the psychiatrist who in the early 1970s wanted homosexuality removed from the DSM as a disorder now wants in back in there. He is at Columbia University.
Anonymous
Posted: 2005/9/10 15:58  Updated: 2005/9/10 15:58
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Dear Orthodox1,

Thou speakest the truth - plain and simple - thank you for your posting.

In Xrist,

wagnertuba
warmac9999
Posted: 2005/9/19 11:42  Updated: 2005/9/19 11:42
Home away from home
Joined: 2004/2/16
From:
Posts: 1463
 Re: The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Political correctness kills and misinforms in many ways. In the area of homosexuality, political correctness distorts truth by suppressing it. Government will not invest in studies to define the truth for fear of emotional confrontations. Homosexually friendly associations aided by media and entertainment forces "throw out" self serving lies to attack truth and confuse. (Studies like this one are difficult to find as a result.)

Homosexuality, prostitution, and drug abuse are all forms of anti-social and anti-family behavior as well as individually destructive behavior. The more these vile behaviors are condoned and even supported, the more the society in which they are practiced is damaged. The ECUSA and the Anglican Communion are a perfect example of just how destructive these behaviors are when they are allowed to take control of the moral authority of the Church.

There is no real question that the ECUSA is deteriorating. The only question is how rapidly and to what eventual end. From an analysis of previous bad decisions by the Church, membership losses will be in the order of 500,000 by 2010. Attendance losses will be approximately 25% of the active church going population. It is hard to predict how many ECUSA churches will close or leave for more fertile religious ground, but it is certainly conceiveable that the next decade will see a decline of 1000 to 2000 ECUSA connected churches.

For any religious organization to be successful, it must maintain a strong and unwavering moral stand based upon its founding principles. A celebratory position in support of homosexuality is not a moral position.
Support VOL

Please support VirtueOnline with a tax deductible gift.


Your support of our ministry keeps the world informed with the truth!


   

VOL Sponsors



Global Anglican Theological Institute

Multi-Lingual Bible & Theological Education



GlobalAnglican.org
sponsored by VOL







St. Michael
the Archangel

Philadelphia, PA

http://www.anglicanphiladelphia.org

Traditional
Anglo-Catholic
Worship
for PA, NJ, DE

Worship at 8 & 10am
215 Belmont Ave
Bala Cynwyd, PA
215-247-1092
Anglican
Philadelphia.org



The Diocese of Quincy (ACNA)
Standing Together
Upholding the Faith

http://www.dioceseofquincy.org

We invite biblically orthodox, traditional churches beyond our borders to join our 132 year old diocese in planting new churches.

The Very Rev. John R. Spencer
President of the Standing Committee & Vicar General

St. Francis Church
12200 N. Brentfield Dr.
Dunlap, IL 61525
(309) 688-8221

DioceseOfQuincy.org



Contact Us for
advertising rates.