"The Scandal of Southern Baptist Divorce"
By Mike McManus
July 7, 2010
At its recent annual meeting, the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) unanimously passed a remarkable resolution on "the scandal of Southern Baptist divorce," -- "an attempt to speak first to ourselves, and to call ourselves to repentance and accountability."
America's largest Protestant denomination has publicly confessed to a major failure, an unprecedented step in my three decades as an Ethics & Religion columnist.
The resolution articulated the conviction that the SBC must:
1. Realize "how damaging Southern Baptist accommodation to the divorce culture is to our global witness for Christ."
2. Confront "the spiritual wreckage left in our Southern Baptist churches by our own divorce rates and our silence about the same."
3. Acknowledge that "areas where Southern Baptist churches predominate in number often have higher divorce rates than areas we would define as 'unchurched' and in need of evangelical witness." (This is correct. Mississippi's divorce rate is 82 percent (13,000 divorces vs. only 15,900 marriages). Arkansas' rate is 63 percent; Kentucky, 59 percent.)
4. Confess that "Even the most expansive view of the biblical exceptions allowing for divorce and remarriage would rule out many, if not most, of the divorces in our churches."
5. Admit that "The acceleration in rates of divorce in Southern Baptist churches has not come through a shift in theological conviction about Scriptural teaching on divorce but rather through cultural accommodation."
Dr. Richard Land, President of the SBC's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, and the church's most prominent spokesman for two decades, told me that this astonishing resolution emerged from "a growing revulsion by conservative Christians that too many Southern Baptists and other Christians are quoting the Bible by the yard, and practicing it by the inch."
"We have thoroughly conservative leadership in our denomination, and yet the numbers getting divorced are getting worse, and people are just appalled. We clearly believe that the churches have failed to teach and uphold a standard of a biblical concept of marriage. It is harming our witness terribly."
Therefore, the Southern Baptist resolution urged its churches to:
"Address the spiritual wreckage in our Southern Baptist churches by our own divorce rates and our silence about the same."
Proclaim the word of God on the permanence of marriage, and provide on-going enrichment opportunities.
Marry only those who are "biblically qualified" and understand the meaning of lifelong love and fidelity, a covenant "until death do them part."
Urge those "in troubled or faltering marriages to seek godly assistance and where possible, reconciliation."
This is an extraordinary "mea culpa" by a national Christian denomination, which ought to be emulated by other national churches.
However, there is a missing element, a failure to recognize that the marriage culture cannot be restored by a decree from the leaders of a national denomination, or even by well-intentioned churches. For example, many pastors think what a troubled marriage needs is to see a Christian counselor. (I wrote a recent column reporting that couples who do so are two to three times more likely to divorce.)
On the other hand, every church has couples who have survived marital crises such as adultery or bankruptcy, who could be trained to tell their story of recovery to a couple in crisis, and can save four of five such marriages.
However, how can they be identified and trained to be of assistance?
An Episcopal priest, asked this question any pastor could ask: "Are there any couples whose marriages were once on the rocks, but are now in a state of healing? If so, I'd like to meet with you after the service." Of 180 people in church that day, 10 couples showed up. They developed a 17-step recovery strategy, like the 12 steps of AA, and helped save 38 of 40 crisis marriages.
In my reporting for this column, I have come across similar proven interventions at other stages of marriage: preparation with 93 percent success rate over two decades, and a "Stepfamily Support Group" that saves 80 percent of marriages, which typically divorce at a 70 percent rate.
My wife and I lead Marriage Savers, a ministry which helped the clergy of 229 cities to create a Community Marriage Policy to implement these reforms. We train the mentors. Result: the divorce rate for cities falls 17.5 percent on average and has plunged in half in Austin, Kansas City, KS and its suburbs, El Paso, Modesto, CA and Salem, OR. Cohabitation rates drop by a third compared to similar cities in each state. Marriage rates rise about 16 percent.
To learn more, go to www.marriagesavers.org. You can reach Mike personally at: mike@marriagesavers.org
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| daveball | Posted: 2010/7/8 0:49 Updated: 2010/7/8 0:49 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/12/18 From: Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 2718 |
I hope the ACNA notes this Biblical position on marriage and considers responing similarly.
|
| CH-Discern | Posted: 2010/7/8 2:35 Updated: 2010/7/8 2:35 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/10/10 From: Posts: 585 |
Christians should be outraged that our own are divorcing as frequently as the unchurched. This situation begs to be corrected. All churches should sponsor marriage enrichment/divorce prevention programs in their churches (and better yet, in their communities).
As a psychologist/marriage counselor for 20+ years, I completely endorse the marriage savers ministry. We need more of the same, especially the use of successful couples who have been through the mill. However, I disagree with the author’s opinion (and use of questionable research) that is biased against Christian counselors. If I look for it, I am certain I can find research showing the opposite result. The reasons for divorce of those in counseling need to be examined (because counselors are unjustly being blamed). 1. Many couples do not enter counseling until it is too late. Those with less severe problems generally avoid counseling altogether. All it takes to sabotage success of counseling is for one member of the couple to have already made up his/her mind that it will fail. Many times, prior to counseling, one member has privately decided to divorce no matter what. Sometimes they are looking for justification by the counselor (which they rarely get) or so that later they can say that they tried counseling but it failed (blaming the counselor instead of themselves) or for legal purposes). But the truth is that in many cases, counseling is doomed from the beginning. Some commitment to the process is always required. You may have heard the joke: How many counselors does it take to change a light bulb? Answer: Only one, but the light bulb has to want to change. Of course, we are talking about people here. 2. We are living in a sexually permissive culture where sexual addiction is epidemic. How many of you would be willing to “do a Hosea” and stay in a marriage where the partner is repeatedly unfaithful (and unwilling to get the higher level of treatment required for change)? Often the extent of the adultery is revealed during the counseling process. This is common source of “failure of counseling.” Again, doomed from the beginning. 3. Likewise, people who refuse treatment for severe psychiatric disorders or drug addiction/alcoholism cannot function in a marriage and bring daily emotional torture to their mates. Domestic violence is not unusual these days. I still do not encourage divorce in any of these situations, but I may encourage separation until the unfaithful, violent, or addicted spouse gets appropriate treatment. In my experience, when couples are both serious about wanting help (and don’t have ongoing adultery, abuse, or addiction), then the success rate of counseling is quite high. |
| Curate | Posted: 2010/7/8 5:44 Updated: 2010/7/8 5:44 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/4/8 From: England Posts: 194 |
The link is incorrect. It should be www.marriagesavers.org/ The period at the end of the address makes the link fail.
|
| daveball | Posted: 2010/7/8 14:37 Updated: 2010/7/8 14:37 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/12/18 From: Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 2718 |
CH,
We also live in a "throw away" society. Many in today's go-go gotta' have it now generation regard marriage as a temporary arrangement, terminable at will. More and more are opting to not even go to that level of legitimization and are simply cohabitating. Any thought about a marriage bond is ignored. Two becoming one is not a consideration. |
| jfmckenna | Posted: 2010/7/8 22:35 Updated: 2010/7/8 22:36 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/4 From: Posts: 718 |
The head of the National Organization for Marriage, Maggie Gallagher, was in NY speaking and I met with her afterward and said, "I'm going to an Anglican church-planting conference near Dallas next week. Do you have a message for Archbishop Duncan?" She said tell him that the church-planting effort should lead with marriage-enrichment opportunities, which is what the culture needs most." I had a short one-on-one meeting with the archbishop and gave him that message. This marriage debacle in our country is the root cause of social problems that are typically ascribed to economic factors -- violent crime, addiction, and mental illness. Mike McManus has the right ideas.
|
| CH-Discern | Posted: 2010/7/9 1:24 Updated: 2010/7/9 1:24 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/10/10 From: Posts: 585 |
Violent crime, addiction, and mental illness have many secondary causes (of course, the primary cause is sin). But I agree, one of those secondary causes is the breakdown of the traditional marriage -- often associated with the selfish lack of commitment and disrespect/ disregard of covenant. One's word does not mean much these days; a promise is not really a promise.
|
| CitizenWhy | Posted: 2010/8/11 13:47 Updated: 2010/8/11 13:51 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2010/8/9 From: Posts: 1 |
Among the efforts to make marriages work better (not to "reduce" divorce), Anglicans need to consider these actions: ... 1. Develop simple short religious exercises/prayers, some to be performed only between the couple, others to be performed with the couple and the children together. Some attention should be paid to what Mormons do in the home. ... 2. Engaged couples should be invited to spend 3-6 evenings with 3-4 married couples. Preferably sharing and tasting recipes, then eating a meal preceded by a short simple prayer for God to bless their marriages. ... 3. Perhaps devotion to particular married saints (a couple) as patrons of marriage. ... 4. Perhaps the development of a "marriage rosary, " a short set of beads in which marriage vows would be repeated along with brief scripture passages and small definitions of virtues encouraged by the state of marriage. The couple could use the marriage beads together, and could also quietly "say their beads" in breaks at work.
|














