ACNA Vote by Church of England Synod is Wedge into Greater Anglican Acceptance
News Analysis
By David W. Virtue in London
www.virtueonline.org
2/11/2010
On any rating, the overwhelming affirmation by the Synod of the Church of England to recognize the fledging Anglican Church of North America province is a small but significant step, a wedge under the door of both the Church of England and the World Wide Anglican Communion.
The final vote, which was not apparent in the debate, as many of us listening believed it would be a squeaker with a win for the rejectionists, was stunning. The numbers speak for themselves. The final vote was 309 in favor, 69 against and 17 recorded abstentions. The only other stunning victory for orthodoxy was the passage of the '98 Lambeth Resolution 1:10 where the vote was 529 to 70.
The final draft of the resolution recognized several factors now made public and unadorned for all to see.
First of all, the resolution said orthodox Episcopalians are indeed being persecuted by revisionists; however much TEC leaders whine that the brokenness is caused by those leaving, the resolution says otherwise.
Secondly, the resolution said that these faithful orthodox Anglicans want to remain in the Anglican family and not become outsiders. In fact, it did more than that. It was a wedge that will, in time, lead to a full chair at the Anglican Communion table. Of course, the resolution has to go through various hoops including the two archbishops, more councils of the church and the Anglican Consultative Council where it will be rejected as the ACC receives the majority of its funding from The Episcopal Church.
It is an inevitability, in the Anglican process that indicates AC-NA will not be denied in the long term as they are fully backed by the GAFCON primates and many other orthodox groups. Time is on their side. Archbishop Robert Duncan has only to wait, grow AC-NA (they are working on a project to expand AC-NA by 1000 churches), and gently push the boundaries. The Church of England archbishops have till 2011 to come up with a decision.
Ecclesiastical politicos will argue that the delaying tactics of thought, prayer and discussion will kill it. Not a chance. Delay is the worst that can happen.
The debate itself was the picture of British good manners. The British are hyper verbal (by American standards) and love the sport of debate. Lorna Ashworth made her low-keyed pitch for her resolution arguing forcefully that she was not anti TEC or the ACoC, but simply wanted to recognize ACNA. Her resolution found itself amended by Bishop Michael Hill of the Diocese of Bristol and a member of the leftist Anglican Consultative Council. He argued that while the amendment leaned towards issues of human sexuality, the real issue is about the process of reception with groups like ACNA.
The passing of the motion hasn't resolved all the issues, he added. "It leaves the doors open but makes it clear that the church has to deal with these matters with due process and not in an ad hoc way."
The original motion, submitted by Lorna Ashworth of Chichester, called on synod to "express the desire that the Church of England be in communion with the Anglican Church in North America." It was defeated, but she was not unhappy with the final outcome. Other amendments were put up, but failed.
One of her choice lines was this: "The provinces to which ACNA members once belonged have strayed from the fundamental core teaching of the Anglican church. They have either rejected the uniqueness of Christ, or they have questioned it; the same with Christ's virgin birth, and his physical, literal death and resurrection, as providing the only means of salvation for those outside the Kingdom of God. Scripture is not seen as the authoritative Word of God to His people, and the biblical standard of marriage not upheld."
Things got a little testy when the Rev. Johannes Arens of the Diocese of Ripon and Leeds said that Ashworth's paper "makes accusations about a province that is not present. We should not meddle in internal politics of another Anglican church. It is particularly unfair to do this without any formal representation of that province."
The Rev. Canon Simon Butler, a priest in the Diocese of Southwark, tried to derail the whole debate when he rose to move an end to the debate and accusing the Synod of breaking the 9th Commandment and bearing false witness against their brothers and sisters. This prompted a woman delegate to rise saying that she was only going to talk about the Anglican Church of Canada, but now she was going to have to defend herself for telling lies.
A moment that was lost on the media came when Ms Ashworth publicly praised Anglican theologian Dr. J. I. Packer. She said she had learned from him as a godly minister whose books had been read by millions. Rowan looked distinctly embarrassed by the reference to Packer as the octogenarian theologian had called on him to resign for his failed leadership of the communion.
The Rev. Brian Lewis of Chelmsford asked synod to think of those in the Episcopal Church "who feel hurt by those who have betrayed [them] and left. There are many people in this church who think about leaving. I think about it a lot, but I stay. It's painful, difficult and spiritually quite destructive, but I stay. There are Episcopalians who for very different reasons find it difficult to stay, but they stay ... your primary responsibility [is] to those of us who stay."
The Rev. Tim Dakin, general secretary of the Church Mission Society, said that synod "should proclaim it is in communion with all faithful Anglicans. The way we relate to those who are different from us reveals the sort of world we want. This is the challenge at the heart of the modern missionary movement. It is out of this messy process that something holy might come."
The Venerable Normon Russell, archdeacon of Berkshire in the Diocese of Oxford, expressed his support for ACNA, saying that he attended ACNA's inaugural meeting in Bedford, Texas, as an observer. "I really wanted to see what was going on. My few days there were a time of spiritual renewal," he said, noting that there is spiritual renewal in the Episcopal Church, Anglican Church of Canada and ACNA, depending on the individual's interpretation.
When it was all over, orthodox Anglicans from the US and Canada were clearly pleased even though they would have preferred the Ashworth resolution. But as one noted, "Half a loaf is better than none."
The Rev. Colin Coward, director of Changing Attitude, a U.K.-based LGBT advocacy group, said that Hill's amendment "kicks ACNA's desire for recognition into the long grass. But it did commit to something that is generous in recognizing their desires, but understanding that more needs to be done."
American Anglican Council President David Anderson told ENS that he was pleased with the outcome, even though he and other ACNA members had hoped for Ashworth's motion to be carried. The AAC is a founding member of ACNA. Anderson, a former TEC priest, is now a bishop with CANA, the Nigerian branch of Anglicanism in North America.
Within minutes of the vote, ACNA Archbishop Robert Duncan issued the following statement: "We are deeply thankful that we were given the opportunity to tell the Synod about our church, and our vision for reaching North America with the transforming love of Jesus Christ. This chance to speak directly to our Anglican family was very rewarding. We look forward to working with the friends we made and reaching out to others in the years ahead." Bishop Donald Harvey, who, with Mrs. Cynthia Brust, Dr. Michael Howell, and the Rev. Dr. Tory Baucum, represented the Anglican Church in North America in preparation for the Synod vote.
There was no public smacking of TEC or its leader Katharine Jefferts Schori, just a gracious affirmation of the status of ACNA in the Church of England. Clearly it is a vindication of Duncan's own rite of passage from despised TEC Bishop of Pittsburgh, deposed without trial by Jefferts Schori, into the freedom and leadership of 100,000 Anglicans in some 800 congregations in 28 dioceses. It has been a long hard road, but it is one from which he can surely feel vindicated. The church's stated mission is to reach North America with the Transforming Love of Jesus Christ.
The Rev. Canon Charles K. Robertson, canon to Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, told ENS following the debate that "we in the Episcopal Church do not interfere in the decision-making of other provinces in our Anglican Communion.
"We do, however, restate our ongoing commitment to the gospel of Jesus Christ and to the Five Marks of Mission as a member of the Anglican Communion. We also reiterate our concern with the decisions that have been made, and the one-sided image that is put forward by those who have chosen to depart from the Episcopal Church. We continue our concern with the foreign provinces which have consistently, and with impunity, actively interfered in the affairs of the Episcopal Church, even to the point of exiling faithful members of this church from their historic places of worship."
CANA bishop Martyn Minns echoed similar words, "This is a significant step forward for the ACNA and for all orthodox Anglicans in the U.S. We are grateful to the General Synod for recognizing the home that has been created for those Anglicans who wish to remain a part of the worldwide Anglican Communion. Both ACNA and CANA have provided that home at a crucial time in the life of the church. Today's affirmation from the General Synod is a welcome response to that need."
You can hear and read the following speeches at these links. I am grateful to Anglican Mainstream for providing VOL with them.
Press Conference:
http://www.anglicantv.org/content/coe-2010-acna-press-conference
Audio Debate:
http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gsfeb100210pm.html
Lorna Ashworth's Opening Speech
http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/?p=22956
Lorna Ashworth's Opening speech on Video
http://www.blip.tv/file/3202714 AC-NA website http://anglicanchurch.net/
TEC Episcopal News Service Report
http://www.episcopalchurch.org/79901_119351_ENG_HTM.htm
END
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| john123 | Posted: 2010/2/11 17:06 Updated: 2010/2/11 17:14 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/7/12 From: Posts: 442 |
Let me see if I understand this correctly.
Notwithstanding that we orthodox anglicans have changed nothing, we are the outsiders looking in and begging for admission; or is it readmission. Yes, I said begging. And now we have to wait another year. Really. No matter what spin David may attempt to put on what has happened during the last few days, Williams did no stand up and say " I support those in the Anglican Communion in North America who have stayed firm to God, Christ, The Bible, The Gospels, The Creeds the tenants of Anglicanism etc. Williams silence was deafening. By not standing for those who support the Faith, Williams has stood firm for those who have violated the Faith. The man has no understanding of the hurt he has caused to so many faithful. |
| ctowles | Posted: 2010/2/11 17:11 Updated: 2010/2/11 17:11 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/12/4 From: Posts: 538 |
"There are Episcopalians who for very different reasons find it difficult to stay, but they stay ... your primary responsibility [is] to those of us who stay."
Horse pucky! Ones primary responsibility is to God and obeying God's word. If you don't understand that you are not Anglican. How did he get in the door? |
| AFS1970 | Posted: 2010/2/11 17:20 Updated: 2010/2/11 17:20 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/12/30 From: Stamford, CT Posts: 162 |
I understand how the ACNA leadership has to consider this non-event as positive, because they desperately want to be in communion with the (eventual) female Bishops of the CoE while staying out of communion with the female Bishops of TEC who they will in fact be in communion with if a decision is ever made by England.
However, this article, is nothing but spin designed to obscure the fact that the synod did not recognize ACNA. It even quotes the half a loaf comment from the other thread. So I will repeat that this is not a loaf of any sort, it is merely the baker noticing that the customer is hungry. To paraphrase an old joke about Roman converts, no matter how many times you call a steak a fish, it is still not Friday's diner. |
| Cennydd | Posted: 2010/2/11 18:53 Updated: 2010/2/12 1:06 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/10/30 From: Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin Posts: 7358 |
I reiterate what I said about +Rowan Cantuar in another thread on this blog: "Rowan Williams and the Future of the Anglican Communion."
Cennydd |
| dvirtue | Posted: 2010/2/11 19:07 Updated: 2010/2/11 19:07 |
Webmaster ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/1/2 From: Posts: 204 |
Dear John 123,
The facts are these. Neither archbishop spoke to the motion nor could they. They could not SAY what they believed because the motion if passed (and it was) would need to be debated by them at some future point. In fact both archbishops voted for the amended motion which means their sympathies lay with the amended motion. Cut them some slack. Had they spoken they would have carried the day. As it was the amended motion passed because the vicar of Southwark - a Mr. Butler - accused the Synod of lying if they continued the debate. Nobody likes to be accused of lying and his words sank any hope of the motion being defeated. He did what the orthodox could not have done - sunk the anti-ACNA titanic side. David W. Virtue VIRTUEONLINE |
| john123 | Posted: 2010/2/11 19:49 Updated: 2010/2/11 23:34 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/7/12 From: Posts: 442 |
Thank you David for offering more clarity on the debate.
However, and now comes the nevertheless statement, I am not aware of Williams standing tall and offering the leadership that the question requires an answer to. Had Williams led and called a spade a spade from day one, we would not have the mess we presently face. That those who have held to the Faith should even be considered outsiders and have to beg for admision into a body they never left is outrageous. Similarly, it is outrageous that those have walked away from Christ and our basic tenents should remain inside, unadmonished. Did Williams admonish the presiding bishop, for example, for suggesting that Christ is not the only way to Heaven. Has he ever repudiated the new thoughts of the tec? David. As I ponder the amount of Faith,money and good will that has been wasted and otherwise lost because of the incompetence of Williams, I despair. I am presently south of the border. I see what this wastage could have done if it had been focused on the needs down here. And I do not mean to limit my comments simply to the needs in Mexico. |
| daveball | Posted: 2010/2/11 19:56 Updated: 2010/2/11 19:56 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/12/18 From: Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 2718 |
To be in communion with someone means that you share the same faith, the same values, the same tradition and abide by the same rules, does it not? The C of E already ordains women and now wants to make them bishops. It is said with some regularity, but admitedly with no hard proof I am aware of, that being gay is not unknown in the clergy so presumably a gay bishop is a possibility. The C of E is decidely liberal and becoming more so. Rowan the Lost is an admited "hairy liberal" who has repeatedly not supported the orthodox and has thus far failed to take TEC to task. Tell me again how and why ACNA, if it indeed wants to be orthodox and if it means what it says about not consecrating female bishops, wants to "be in communion with" the C of E. This group looks more like TEC every day.
As for the resolution, it was a "no loaf" for the ACNA. Recall that a motion clearly recognizing the ACNA was soundly defeated. The substitute motion was a convenient way for the Synod to put the whole discussion on the back burner for a couple years without having to accept a TEC favoring motion or, in fact, make any decision. In other words, an English "no decision" phrased in "nuanced" language. If and when this comes up again, it will certainly be dealt with with "due process", that being to refer it to the ACC as "the proper process" again removing any decision from the Synod and guaranteeing it will be rejected. As for recognizing that the orthodox are being persecuted, this should be no surprise to anyone and denying it would be farcical. Stating it with no attached consequence is another meaningless gesture of circumvention. Sorry to sound like a wet blanket but I really see nothing in the whole discussion to rejoice over. TEC got what it wanted which was that ACNA was not formally recognized. It gives them more time to "discern" and the subvert. |
| Angusdei | Posted: 2010/2/11 19:59 Updated: 2010/2/11 19:59 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/12/17 From: Gastonia, North Carolina Posts: 14 |
Ah! My friends, let's not forget the fact that this motion being passed at this critical time probably has Jefferts-Schori and her band of heretics in TEC a bit upset right now. They will have alot more to consider than their own agendas at GC2012 because of this small baby step in a more conservative direction. At last, there is a glimmer of hope. Just hang in there, and keep the Faith.
|
| Engus | Posted: 2010/2/11 21:25 Updated: 2010/2/11 21:26 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/12/6 From: Posts: 113 |
I don't see what there is to be so darned happy about.
They took the original petition, flipped it around, and agreed that it was the desire of ANCA to be part of the Anglican Communion. Then, it was, 'More to follow next Year!' Please. What am I missing here, David ? |
| dvirtue | Posted: 2010/2/11 22:36 Updated: 2010/2/11 22:36 |
Webmaster ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/1/2 From: Posts: 204 |
Dear John123,
I have no argument with your take on Rowan Williams himself. Your thoughts may represent the majority of VOL readers. I simply wanted to write to your earlier observation that I believed required some further enlightening and correcting. Sincerely, David |
| john123 | Posted: 2010/2/11 23:31 Updated: 2010/2/11 23:31 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/7/12 From: Posts: 442 |
Dear David.
I again thank you for taking a moment out of your busy schedule at this moment in time to provide me with in sights that are not open to me. I was not there and so the politics of the moment are not readily apparent to me. Yes David, there is a lot of hurt and anguish on the part of those who have stood the course. We know a number of simple truths. (1) We are true Anglicans. We have not strayed. (2) We do not need Williams blessings to remain true to our base in Christ. (3) We have the strength to move forward according to God's will. God Bless |
| Romans828 | Posted: 2010/2/12 0:37 Updated: 2010/2/12 0:37 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/27 From: Posts: 326 |
In fairness, this resolution is a victory for the ACNA, even if it didn't achieve ALL of the recognition that it wanted the first go-round. That's the English way. It clearly sends a message of C of E support for orthodox Anglicans in North America, and it's being interpreted that way in the secular news media as well. Imagine the interpretation that would have accompanied a defeat of the motion.
One historical note: Lorna Ashworth delivered a beautiful speech, but in her recounting of the string of C of E recognitions of full communion running from the 1970's to the 1990's, such as those of North India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Lutherans of Porvoo, she missed a much earlier example. In 1931, the convocations of both Canterbury and York ratified full communion with the Congress of Old Catholics of continental Europe. |
| Sihugo | Posted: 2010/2/12 0:40 Updated: 2010/2/12 0:40 |
Quite a regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/11/22 From: Posts: 52 |
OK, my two cents....The Orthodox Anglican communion needs to break into at least two churches. One that allows women's ordination and another that doesn't allow Wo, Ho, and any PB dated later than 1928. Rome just seems to be calling louder and louder...
|
| otispage2 | Posted: 2010/2/12 3:16 Updated: 2010/2/12 15:37 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 640 |
The schismatic death rattle of the Communion, following TEC’s demise, authenticates a certain terminal condition of a once great church.
ABC is useless, the CofE irrelevant and the World-Wide Episcopate fumbles in not taking decisive action to repel the heresy that grips the Communion. Better all burned at the stake than see the disgrace of a once great religion genuflect to homosexuality. Better to bow to Rome or proceed quickly and diligently for a renewal of the “the faith once given.” Get on with it! |
| Engus | Posted: 2010/2/12 12:49 Updated: 2010/2/12 12:49 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/12/6 From: Posts: 113 |
Honestly, has the CofE done a much better job of remaining 'Orthodox' than has TEC here in the States ? Is the CofE not moving in the same direction as TEC ? Perhaps at a slower pace, but the course is fairly much the same.
Personally, I don't see Rome as asking for returning Anglicans to 'bow' as if conquered or defeated. Rome has made it's opening invitation, and with it comes the allowance to retain Anglican custom and tradition in Worship, as well as an allowance for Hierarchical concerns. I can't, for the life of me, understand the need for 'acceptance' of a Church in complete disarray, as the CofE obviously is. TEC has been shanghaied and It has made it relatively clear that those old fogies who insist on clinging to their Orthodoxy are little more than relics of a past better left in the past, and the welcome mat is being rolled up from under our feet. Do any of you actually think that should Schori be replaced, that her replacement will be someone who moves back to a more traditional Faith ?? I choose to view Rome's allowances more as the Father of the prodigal son, rather than any insistence on 'bowing'. We can maintain our form of Worship and also remain true to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Faith. Communion with Rome is a thousand times better than begging for Communion with a Church in the midst of becoming Apostate. |
| AllanP | Posted: 2010/2/12 13:36 Updated: 2010/2/12 13:36 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2008/3/28 From: Posts: 190 |
Indeed, as we recite the Nicene Creed we do say that we/I believe in One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. Thus believing in One Church we should be making efforts to (at the very least) be friends with Rome.
As the Traditional Anglican Communion goes through the process of accepting the Personal Ordinorates we shall see how this all works out. It it goes the way that I think it will, than re-uniting with Rome will become even more tempting/desirable for the rest of us, including ACNA. In the meantime, I think we should concentrate our efforts on remaining Faithful to God, and less effort expended on being in Communion with the CoE. |
| Bulwark | Posted: 2010/2/12 13:58 Updated: 2010/2/12 14:19 |
Quite a regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/7/10 From: Posts: 69 |
Given the organic and organizational structure of the Anglican Communion, we must accept this as a positive first step, if it continues to move in the right direction of full inclusion of ACNA. However, we should not allow the organizational structure of Anglicanism to be our supreme focus or obsession. The mission of the church must continue, even if traditional Anglican structures choose to abandon ACNA down the road. What is left will be Anglican no matter the structure. We must never forget that it is they who have abandoned Anglicanism not us.
|
| stuckinTO | Posted: 2010/2/14 13:26 Updated: 2010/2/14 13:26 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/5/30 From: Toronto Posts: 16 |
How can any church not in unity with itself, be in unity with Christ?
|




















