Cranmer Scholar Weighs Bible in Light of English Reformation and American Culture
By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
November 5, 2009
David W. Virtue recently interviewed Cranmer scholar, historian and theologian The Rev. Canon Dr. Ashley Null in the unlikely venue of New York City where neither lives. The occasion was a "Focus on Ministry" conference held at the American Bible Society which included outstanding Bible teacher and expositor Jonathan Juckes, Rector of Kirk Ella in East Yorkshire. He has served at major Anglican evangelical parishes in England (Sevenoaks, St. Helen's, Bishopsgate) and was on the staff of the Proclamation Trust, an organization dedicated to promoting expository preaching. The Rev. Gregory O. Brewer, rector of Calvary St. Georges co-chaired the event with the Rev. John Mason Founding Rector of Christ Church New York City. Mason taught New Testament theology and has been an Anglican minister for over thirty-five years. He is originally from Sydney, Australia.
Dr. Null is canon theologian in the Diocese of Western Kansas. He is a fellow of the Royal Historical Society, London, and currently The Episcopal Church's Scaife-Anderson Fellow at St. Vladimir's Orthodox Seminary in New York. He is the author of "Thomas Cranmer's Doctrine of Repentance: Renewing the Power to Love" and a "The Power of Unconditional Love: Thomas Cranmer for Today", forthcoming from Holy Trinity, Brompton, in London. Since I was attending the lectures he was giving here in New York, he agreed to this interview.
VOL: Canon Null, what are you doing in New York City?
NULL: I have the privilege and pleasure of speaking at the first annual Focus on Ministry Conference in NYC which is a partnership of Christ Church Anglican, Calvary/St George (TEC) and the American Bible Society.
VOL: What is the thrust of your message?
NULL: I have specially appreciated two things about this conference. First, its wrestling with how to understand the Bible in light of the insights from the English Reformation and, secondly, how those in the Anglican tradition can effectively proclaim the Gospel to those steeped in the assumptions of American popular culture.
VOL: So who is taking part in the conference?
NULL: The Rev. Jonathan Juckes, is rector of Kirk Ella in East Yorkshire, who is giving expository preaching sessions and workshops during the day on how to exegete the Bible for preaching purposes to area pastors. My brief has been two fold - to discuss the relationship between the Bible and Cranmer's liturgical initiatives as well as the theological principles at the heart of the English Reformation.
VOL: What insights from the English Reformation do you think would be helpful for people steeped in American popular culture?
NULL: I am so glad you asked. Americans today often confuse unconditional affirmation with unconditional love. Unconditional affirmation is what your dog gives you. He simply affirms you without challenging your innate desire to be the center of your own universe. That's why it feels so good.
Unconditional love, however, is not the same as unconditional affirmation. Love creates a crisis. And the greater the love, the greater the crisis. For love reaches out for union. For implicit within the gift of love is a calling of the other into relationship. To accept the gift of love is admit into our heart a power from outside ourselves that tugs at our very self-centredness, seeking to draw us into relationship by stirring up in us a desire to love in return the one who gave us the gift of love. Yet, the price of this relationship is a dent in our self-sufficient autonomy, where our selfish ways have thrived unquestioned. And the greater the love, the greater the loss of the right to live for oneself alone. And perfect, unconditional love seeks to stir up an equally unreserved giving of all of ourselves to the other. In short, true unconditional love does not simply affirm us in our self-satisfied self-centredness. True unconditional love provokes the ultimate crisis where we are called to die completely to our desire for autonomy and wholly give ourselves to the one who has already done the same for us.
The true meaning of the Gospel of Grace is this: that God unconditionally calls each of us to seek release from our selfish ways so that we can join the self-giving fellowship of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, and his love is so at work in us to transform us that one day we will enjoy fellowship with God and one another as much as God enjoys fellowship within Himself.
VOL: Did the English Reformation address this issue?
NULL: What is amazing about the English Reformation is that it understood that unconditional love is at the very heart of the gospel. Christianity has always understood that the only effective way to fight sin is to love God more than selfish self-centeredness. The dilemma, however, has always been how do you help people to actually love like that. The Medieval answer was to use both hope and fear: on the one hand, to give people hope that if they did what they could God would put that love in them and, on the other, to stir up fear in Christians that if they didn't do what they could, they would spend eternity apart from His love. The English reformers understood that fear, shame, and duty do not help people love God. Rather, they promote a sense of worthlessness that actually makes people more susceptible to the lure of sinful self gratification. After all when would you must want to make themselves feel good, if only for a short time? When you feel really bad about yourself. The reformers understood that the ability to love God can only come by knowing He first loved us unconditionally and unchangingly. That was the whole point of teaching Justification by faith. Salvation could not be earned. It had to be received as a free gift. After all, if love is earned, it's not love. Of course, that goes diametrically opposed to the assumptions of American culture.
VOL: In what sense is it contrary to American culture?
NULL: The American dream, more accurately the American myth, or even more accurately, the American illusion is that everyone has the opportunity and burden to create their own identity, to define their future, to be all that they can be by creating their own sense of self through what they do. In this culture, your worth is specifically determined by your performance. Your success at becoming what you think will give you meaning and purpose is all about the individual defining, shaping, governing, protecting, preserving and financing the universe in which they choose to inhabit. That's why American culture confuses unconditional love with unconditional affirmation. If you are seeking to create your own identity, you want affirmation that you are being successful. This is where religion can actually be a stumbling block in the way of people learning the true Gospel. They can look at religion as just another means of proving to themselves and to others that they are good people because they do good things and better than those who don't. You may have noticed that there are some tensions currently in the Anglican Communion?
VOL: Yes, I have. (Laughter)
NULL: What is truly ironic and a cause for weeping is that so often all sides in our current inter-Anglican debates slip so easily into competing moralisms, that is, having their own favorite list and activities which show that they are good people and why those who disagree with them are not good people. Whenever you use Christianity to prove you look like God and better than other people you have lost hold of the cross and the insights of the English Reformation.
VOL: What do you mean?
NULL: The heart of the Anglican Reformation is not what we do for God but what God has done for us. It is not about earning God's love but sharing the love he has so graciously given us. For Cranmer grace produces gratitude, gratitude produces love, love (not shame, fear or duty) produces repentance, repentance then produces good works, and good works produces a better society.
VOL: So what is the relationship between unconditional love and repentance?
NULL: That's a key point. You remember when we said that the difference between unconditional love and unconditional affirmation is that unconditional love challenges our self-centeredness. To begin to know God is to begin to know how much unlike Him we are. In the words of Cranmer, we need to remember how easily we are led astray by following "too much the devices and desires of our own hearts." A friend of mine pointed out a wonderful bumper sticker, "Don't believe everything you think." The more we spend time in God's presence by reading his Word and in His worship we begin to realize that our hearts and minds are challenged by his unconditional love to grow more like the one who has made known His love for us on the cross. You see the problem is not so much that good works are not important, the problem all too often in contemporary Anglicanism of whatever branch is that we get the cart before the horse. We emphasize the work that we should do, without recognizing whatever we do is the fruit of God working in us. (Phil 2: 12-13) That Scripture makes clear that we are to be active in following Christ and serving others and the only way that is possible is if we remember and rely on Christ to be at work in us first to will and to do what is right.
VOL: In a nutshell, what would you say the message of this conference is?
NULL: True to his Erasmian training, Thomas Cranmer said it best: the Bible is the "most holy relic that remaineth upon earth." What he meant by that was that the Bible, because it is God's Word, and God's words, it is the living mind of Christ. As we are steeped in it, or better yet, as it is indelibly written on our hearts and minds by the Holy Spirit, we encounter and are united to Christ. That means He dwells in us and we in him through His word and worship. Only then can we can become effective communicators to a performance-driven culture. What is our message: that rest for the soul, hope for present wholeness, vision and energy to make a difference in society today and assurance of dwelling in God's presence in the Age to come is found only in God's unconditional love made uniquely clear in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, our only Savior and Lord.
VOL: Thank you Dr. Null
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| otispage2 | Posted: 2009/11/9 1:51 Updated: 2009/11/9 1:57 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 615 |
Respectfully, it is my belief that Null’s explanation of “unconditionality” is contradicted by Scripture.
Null states, “The true meaning of the Gospel of Grace is this: that God unconditionally calls each of us to seek release from our selfish ways so that we can join the self-giving fellowship of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, and his love is so at work in us to transform us that one day we will enjoy fellowship with God and one another as much as God enjoys fellowship within Himself.” Some would insist that Cranmer would have agreed that God’s call is conditioned to His elect. And that those called are subject to the conditions of confession, repentance and forgiveness. Scripture is unambiguous in insisting that "Repentance" is required. That is a certain condition! God also commands us to confess our sins so that we may be cleansed. 1John 1:9 “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Having been commanded to repent, we are also commanded to forgive, as we have been forgiven. Each time a believer recites the Lord’s Prayer, we ask for forgiveness and we commit to God that we will forgive others! Matthew 6:11 “And forgive us our debts (our trespasses/ transgressions ), as we also have forgiven our debtors” (those who transgress/trespass against us). So, where we seek forgiveness from God, we are sinful and violate His forgiveness by our not being forgiving of others: Matthew 6:14-15 “For if you forgive men for their transgressions, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive men, then your heavenly father will not forgive your transgressions.” Mark 11:25 “And whenever you stand praying, forgive, if you have anything against anyone; so that your Father also who is in heaven may forgive you your transgressions.” Often times instead of being forgiving we become judgmental. We are then thrown into double jeopardy, falling back to the practices of nonbelievers who exercise unforgiving, judgmental traits through subdued anger, bitterness and viciousness. So God commands us to be forgiving, to be discerning, to have an attitude founded in love of being forgiving. Colossians 3:12,13 “And so, as those who have been chosen of God, holy and beloved, put on a heart of compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience; bearing with one another, and forgiving each other, whoever has a complaint against anyone; just at the Lord forgave you, so also you should.” In conclusion, it is my belief God's call, love and foregiveness is certainly conditional. |
| artistree | Posted: 2009/11/9 14:05 Updated: 2009/11/9 14:05 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/16 From: Lake Tomahawk Wisconsin Posts: 329 |
Absolutely otispage2, good points. I agree with you.
Artistree |
| CH-Discern | Posted: 2009/11/10 2:37 Updated: 2009/11/10 2:40 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/10/10 From: Posts: 259 |
The offer of redemption, that is, the forgiveness of sins, is open to all. Free. But one must admit that he/she needs the offered forgiveness, admit that he/she is a sinner and says so-- which is called repentance and confession. Obviously, if a person denies their sin, then that same person will not believe that they need forgiveness, and therefore they will not ask for it-- and will not receive it.
God's love is unconditional (Christ died for all sinners), but being saved certainly has some basic, common-sense conditions. |
| otispage2 | Posted: 2009/11/10 3:11 Updated: 2009/11/10 3:13 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 615 |
And there is this small detail, the "condition" of confessing and continued repentance of personal sins for the saved Christian in 1John 1:8-10:
"If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar and His word is not in us." |
| esniii | Posted: 2009/11/11 15:50 Updated: 2009/11/11 15:50 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/3/29 From: Posts: 390 |
“The true meaning of the Gospel of Grace is this: that God unconditionally calls each of us to seek release from our selfish ways so that we can join the self-giving fellowship of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, and his love is so at work in us to transform us that one day we will enjoy fellowship with God and one another as much as God enjoys fellowship within Himself.”
otispage2, I'm not sure your position is really distinct from Canon Null's. Canon Null specifically mentions that while God calls us unconditionally, He calls us to seek release from our selfishness and to allow God's love to transform us to a Heavenly state. I suspect if you asked the Canon what was the path for one to achieve such an escape from selfishness (even specifically from a Cranmerian point of view,) it might closely mirror your insisted pre-conditions of confession and continuing repentance, and perhaps also include still more steps that the Christian will regularly undertake. |
| otispage2 | Posted: 2009/11/12 3:34 Updated: 2009/11/12 3:34 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 615 |
With absolute respect for you, esniii, I suggest that we plumb the theological depths in understanding God’s call juxtaposed with His choice of those called.
Here we journey into the mystery of His of those He predestined. The key point of argument in reply to you is my belief that God’s call is conditional in that it is conditioned to His elect. Where Calvin may sustain me for this belief, I further believe Arminius would not. I believe His sovereign choice confirms the "condition" that His call is discrete and selective of those He has foreknown and predestined. Romans 8:29-30 “For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified.” Ephesians 1:3-13 "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him in love. He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will to the praise of the glory of His grace, which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved. In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace which He lavished on us. In all wisdom and insight He made known to us the mystery of His will, according to His kind intention which He purposed in Him with a view to an administration suitable to the fullness of the times, that is, the summing up of all things in Christ, things in the heavens and things on the earth. In Him also we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to His purpose who works all things after the counsel of His will, to the end that we who were the first to hope in Christ would be to the praise of His glory." |
| CH-Discern | Posted: 2009/11/13 1:21 Updated: 2009/11/13 1:26 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/10/10 From: Posts: 259 |
Otis-
Indeed, all we need to do is to let scripture speak to us on this issue. Little more needs to be said about predestination than what Paul, by the power of the Holy Spirit, has revealed. However, there is a divine paradox here, a mystery that the human mind cannot fully plumb. Arminians will point out: True choice (and responsibility) was endowed to us in God creating us in His own image. The Bible makes clear that we have enough free will to be held responsible for our choices: "This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live. . . . " (Deuteronomy 30:19, NIV) Scripture also makes clear that the way we use our free will is somehow impaired: "For in my inner being I delight in God's law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members." (Romans 7:22-24) These truths are somehow reconcilable. According our usual way of thinking, it would be unjust and unfair for God to judge people if He were totally responsible for what people are and do. But God does judge, and He punishes and rewards people according to their choices; so then we must be accountable for our choices. In Scripture, we are commanded to do certain things and to not-do certain things and we are warned of negative consequences for disobedience. Clearly, we can choose to obey or to ignore God’s commands. The Garden of Eden story is a wonderful illustration of this. There was only one thing God told Adam and Eve to avoid doing. Everything else was OK. But guess what? The first humans disobeyed, and learned about evil. The obvious fact of evil in the world convinces most of us of the reality of available choices for good or evil. Then Paul reminds us of God's ultimate sovereignty; God's will....will always be done. All these points are scriptural and therefore true, even if (together) they seem contradictory and illogical to limited human cognition. Those who require a sense of certainty (rather than faith)will choose one option or the other(Calvinism or Arminianism). But instead, let us trust that God's Word is true and that these truths are somehow reconcilable, even if beyond our current comprehension. A certain amount of mystery must be accepted. |
| otispage2 | Posted: 2009/11/13 11:10 Updated: 2009/11/13 11:11 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 615 |
Well stated, respected CH-Discern. I stand in your shadow, but I am probably impaired by my own conviction that it was not my choice, it was His that I became a Christian late in life.
It was not my free-will decision. I am too weak except to respond to His call -- that as exemplified in this exchange -- compels me to admit that your understanding and wisdom is greater than mine. Sola Scriptura, Sola Fida, Sola Gratia. |
| CH-Discern | Posted: 2009/11/13 23:57 Updated: 2009/11/13 23:57 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/10/10 From: Posts: 259 |
Otis-
You wrote: "I am too weak except to respond to His call.." I admire your humility. You have more wisdom than you think. As Paul said, "when I am weak then I am strong"... because, in admitting my weakness, I then must completely trust in God's grace. Notice that you DID respond to His call. He empowered you to so choose. But choose you did. The paradox continues. |
| otispage2 | Posted: 2009/11/14 1:11 Updated: 2009/11/14 1:11 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 615 |
Respected CH-Discern: Given that "He empowered (me) to so choose", I sincerely believe the glory is God's not mine in responding to His choice and call. (Gal 1:24)
|
| otispage2 | Posted: 2009/11/14 11:17 Updated: 2009/11/14 11:17 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 615 |
The following is an "after-thought" regarding your statement, "Scripture also makes clear that the way we use our free will is somehow impaired: "For in my inner being I delight in God's law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members." (Romans 7:22-24) These truths are somehow reconcilable":
The law of the Spirit of life in Jesus Christ is contrasted with the Law (TORAH). Separate from the matter of one's "free-will" subordinated to sin, Christ provides the victory over the "law of sin at work within my members." Christ’s witness compared to the witness of the Jews provides a startling contradiction between the two dispensations of the Law and the Prophets (TORAH) and that of Grace. The following exemplifies the contrast with the Torah (the Law) compared to the compelling ministry of Christ and the Holy Spirit as depicted in Romans 6, 7 & 8. Paul frames the juxtaposition contrasting the “Law”, the “law of sin and death”, and “the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus”. The following “transitional” analysis in Romans 7 and 8 is stated in Gordon Fee’s summary (God’s Empowering Presence): A Rom 7:12,23 The Law, Torah, is good just and holy. B 7:14-24, 25b But the first Law was used by another “law” : Sin, which in turn leads to the body of this death. C 8,2A Enter the third “law”, the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. B’ 8:2B The third “law” sets one free from the second “law”, both sin and death. A’ 8: 3, 4 The third “law” fulfills the intent of the first Law, which was incapable of dealing with sin and thus producing righteousness. Rom 7: 14-25 is a “transitional statement” bridging Romans 6 (no longer a slave to sin) to 8:1, 2 (the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and death) by contrasting the Law (TORAH), the law of sin and death, and the law of the Spirit of life in Jesus Christ. Romans 7:6 Pronounces the great conclusion of Christ’s law of Grace and the Old Testament Law (TORAH): “But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter.” |
| CH-Discern | Posted: 2009/11/15 20:25 Updated: 2009/11/15 20:28 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/10/10 From: Posts: 259 |
Otis-
Here is another related paradox (consider this a test). I was arguing the Sovereignty of God (doctrine of election/ predestination/sola gratia) points with a brother who supports the Arminian (human free will) position. He asserted the following: My believing in predestination, that is, that even my faith is ordered and empowered by God (therefore I cannot take any credit for it) is actually arrogant! This assertion of arrogance shocked me: “What do you mean?” He responded,“Your position does not sound like humility at all." Then he asked, "Do you have some special favor with God that I do not have? A favor that millions of people do not have? As one of the ‘elect’, what makes you especially chosen by God? Does God really play favorites?” Now there’s a question for you. And another: How can anyone push predestination and not look like a grandiose elitist? Paradoxes are fun. |
| otispage2 | Posted: 2009/11/17 14:08 Updated: 2009/11/17 19:19 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 615 |
Respectfully, honored, CH-Discern, I reply to your “test” with my statement of belief as follows:
I start with this summary: The “special favor” argument infers that one who is elected by God may bear this distinction with pride and not with humility. It is an argument that refutes the “doctrine of election” and endorses the “free will” ability of one to choose God as contrasted with God’s sovereign choice and call. I see this question not as a paradox or a theological contradiction. I see it as an issue of understanding essential truth sustained by Scripture. Athanasius when confronting Arius at Nicea (325AD) refuted the argument that the Son is subordinated to the Father by citing the authority of Scripture. The result was the Doctrine of the Trinity and the Catholic teaching sustained by the Reformers and "traditional denominations" today. Here, the doctrines of Free Will and Election are measured by Scripture that verifies and "justifies" God’s sovereignty. Where the Arian tradition has been sustained through the ages, and is a continuing complaint as weighed by Pelagianism with its Arminium attributes (as certainly seen in Unitarianism, the Mormon religion today and remotely by way of example, Islam!) the truth of Scripture when fully understood sustains the historic judgments of Augustine, Aquinus, Luther, Calvin and Cranmer, especially in establishing the Anglican tradition. In addressing the issue of one being “prideful” for acknowledging he or she is one of the elect of God, the test here is very clear. If one reacts with pride in believing he or she is one of the elect, especially ones so possessed that they become fanatic, that person is not. The realization of those who are is abject humility and yieldedness to Christ. They are indwelled with Christ’s Holy Spirit and are obedient and responsive to His ministerial calls in His name – no matter how innocent, humble or difficult the call. They are sensitive to the path of righteousness as expressed in His gift (Rom 5:17) and understand the Spirit’s discipline (Heb 12:4-11; 1John 1:5-10). They understand the manifestation of the call in trusting Him as a function of His gift of Faith (Eph 2:8). Even though I personally despair of judging the belief of an individual Church member, Churches in all denominations are filled with people who think they are Christians but the truth is they are not. Their “free wills” have not been yielded to God’s will. This fact is certainly and vividly demonstrated in TEC today, where even the Episcopate act in defiance of God’s will as expressed in Scripture. If there is a paradox it is here where the contradiction exists: Churches are filled with “lollypop” Christians who do not understand nor wish to understand the weight and wisdom of God’s "personal revelation" in Scripture. They want the “good feelings” in the church social setting but ignore the issues of sin and sacrifice. There is nothing more apparent, in one example, than those who approve of homosexuality and homosexual blessings in TEC today. They are not his elect. They are not true Christians! They and TEC parade as Christians in name only and are subjected to God’s wrath. (Rom 1:18-32). The proof: they are being thrown over to themselves as a function of their “free wills” separate from God’s will. By this test you may ask me if I am a Christian? My reply is I am on a walk and I hope that it is His judgment that I am. That, I truly admire those humble folk that I have seen who truly are His, who have been are being glorified in His name such as yourself, beloved CH-Discern. Sola Fide, So Gratia. Sola Scriptura |
| CH-Discern | Posted: 2009/11/17 19:22 Updated: 2009/11/17 19:22 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/10/10 From: Posts: 259 |
Good answer!
I like the short version: “It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.” (Psalm 118:8, NKJV) It is good to doubt oneself and even to doubt any church (we are all still a mess), but never should we doubt God's love, grace, mercy, justice, wisdom, power, and will. |
| otispage2 | Posted: 2009/11/18 2:41 Updated: 2009/11/18 2:41 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/3/14 From: Posts: 615 |
Amen!
|














