Vatican Clarifies Celibacy Issue in Apostolic Constitution for Anglicans
http://212.77.1.245/news_services/bulletin/news/24594.php?index=24594&po_date=31.10.2009&lang=en
10/31/2009
CLARIFICATION BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE HOLY SEE PRESS OFFICE, FR. FEDERICO LOMBARDI, S.I., ON SPECULATIONS ABOUT THE CELIBACY ISSUE IN THE ANNOUNCED APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION REGARDING PERSONAL ORDINARIATES FOR ANGLICAN ENTERING INTO FULL COMMUNION WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
There has been widespread speculation, based on supposedly knowledgeable remarks by an Italian correspondent Andrea Tornielli, that the delay in publication of the Apostolic Constitution regarding Personal Ordinariates for Anglicans entering into full communion with the Catholic Church, announced on October 20, 2009, by Cardinal William Levada, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, is due to more than "technical" reasons. According to this speculation, there is a serious substantial issue at the basis of the delay, namely, disagreement about whether celibacy will be the norm for the future clergy of the Provision.
Cardinal Levada offered the following comments on this speculation: "Had I been asked I would happily have clarified any doubt about my remarks at the press conference. There is no substance to such speculation. No one at the Vatican has mentioned any such issue to me. The delay is purely technical in the sense of ensuring consistency in canonical language and references. The translation issues are secondary; the decision not to delay publication in order to wait for the 'official' Latin text to be published in Acta Apostolicae Sedis was made some time ago.
The drafts prepared by the working group, and submitted for study and approval through the usual process followed by the Congregation, have all included the following statement, currently Article VI of the Constitution:
§1 Those who ministered as Anglican deacons, priests, or bishops, and who fulfill the requisites established by canon law and are not impeded by irregularities or other impediments may be accepted by the Ordinary as candidates for Holy Orders in the Catholic Church. In the case of married ministers, the norms established in the Encyclical Letter of Pope Paul VI Sacerdotalis coelibatus, n. 42 and in the Statement "In June" are to be observed. Unmarried ministers must submit to the norm of clerical celibacy of CIC can. 277, §1.
§2. The Ordinary, in full observance of the discipline of celibate clergy in the Latin Church, as a rule (pro regula) will admit only celibate men to the order of presbyter. He may also petition the Roman Pontiff, as a derogation from can. 277, §1, for the admission of married men to the order of presbyter on a case by case basis, according to objective criteria approved by the Holy See.
This article is to be understood as consistent with the current practice of the Church, in which married former Anglican ministers may be admitted to priestly ministry in the Catholic Church on a case by case basis. With regard to future seminarians, it was considered purely speculative whether there might be some cases in which a dispensation from the celibacy rule might be petitioned. For this reason, objective criteria about any such possibilities (e.g. married seminarians already in preparation) are to be developed jointly by the Personal Ordinariate and the Episcopal Conference, and submitted for approval of the Holy See."
Cardinal Levada said he anticipates the technical work on the Constitution and Norms will be completed by the end of the first week of November.
END
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| Anglican10 | Posted: 2009/11/2 21:54 Updated: 2009/11/2 21:54 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/8/24 From: Posts: 2 |
The Vaticans offer sounds to good to be true and I'm sure a lot of Anglicans will go to Rome but the big celibacy rule and other doctrines that one must adhere to to join the RC church will be to much for some. Then comes changing the liturgy down the yellow brick road and then what happens..Anglicans leave Rome again.
So seems like a mess to me. I will attend another Anglican Church when we get the royal boot from the ECUSA and that will happen. They can't wait to get rid of the Traditionalists and in the mean time call themselves a church..oh not so perfect. Go figure..all inclusive resort except for Traditionalists. All due respect but I am sick of this nonscence..I just want to go to church and not feel threatened..so not cool for my spirituality. In my humble opinion Rome looks like a reprieve but I don't buy it. Besides I couldn't join rome because I was divorced so no communion for me and I think it would be another sin not sure which one could be "mortal sin" to remarry. Also, I am not giving up on Anglicanism not now not ever! I respect what the Holy Father offered to Anglicans but already the vague stuff is emerging and I don't envision Unity at all. All I can do is pray for the whole state of Christs church and the world. I hope Anglicanism will not cease to exist. I shouldn't have to give up my religion to kinda believe what the Catholic church teaches. Thanks but no thanks. |
| patulous | Posted: 2009/11/3 21:02 Updated: 2009/11/3 21:06 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/5/18 From: Posts: 1746 |
Anglican 10: If you think about it, it seems that the offer by the Vatican is at a point in when the Anglican Church has stepped away from Christ and believes the trash that any demon could offer. Canterbury has all but burned the 39 articles, the creeds, and the Holy Word.
But, if the ACNA would straighten out it's place in the church, all the anglicans would be more apt to lean it's way. So here we have the Pope and the new Province on either side, and both are doubt ridden enough to turn our eyes away. If the Pope thought he could be the new guiding light for the anglican church, he is wrong. But, the ACNA isn't getting all the Anglicans to follow it either. TEC and Canterbury are definitely on a downward slippery slope to oblivion. There will be a third way, if we pray and stay the course. |













