Episcopal Church Has Caused the Greatest Spiritual Catastrophe since the Reformation
English Archdeacon says staying means greater discipleship and uncompromising mission
By David W. Virtue in Virginia
www.virtueonline.org
Sept. 14, 2009
VIRGINIA---A Church of England Archdeacon says the behavior of The Episcopal Church has brought about the greatest spiritual catastrophe since the need for the Reformation and that the tear in the fabric of the Anglican Communion is near terminal.
The Venerable Michael Lawson of the Diocese of London told members of the Episcopal Evangelical Assembly at a conference held at Virginia Theological Seminary on Friday that the call to remain means a call to greater discipleship and uncompromising mission. He called it a "crisis of opportunity."
"You have no mandate to remain in The Episcopal Church and simply fade into the background, keeping your head down, avoiding controversy, and preaching a scaled down gospel for our very sick and resistant cultures."
Lawson said that reformation, revival and renewal are the pathway towards an Evangelical future. "Episcopal Evangelicals are some of the most strategic people in the world."
"I own and use all the commentaries of John Calvin because they constantly highlight the meta narrative of Scripture. The Reformers rescued the Bible from medieval allegory, distortions and attempts to keep the Scriptures from the people.
"The other aspect of Evangelical renewal is the renewal of the denomination. Ecclesia Reformata, Ecclesia Semper Reformanda - reforming the church from within. It's been a keynote since Augustine, since the magisterial reformers, and indeed since 1966 and 1967 with the National Evangelical Assembly and the first NEAC at Keele," he said.
Lawson praised American evangelist Billy Graham saying that the Church of England had more Evangelical ministers who were converted through him than any other person. "Billy had a huge influence upon our denomination." Lawson also praised the life-long ministry of John R.W. Stott saying that most of us would not have remained in the Church of England if it had not been for him and his enormous impact on the country through the preaching of the gospel for more than 50 years. Lawson said he worked for Stott for six years as Director of Pastoring at All Souls' Langham Place.
Lawson asked, "Are we children of the Donatists or Augustine, of the Anabaptists or the Magisterial Reformers? If we believe that the church must always be reforming itself, then these are some big issues to be tackled."
Lawson said both Calvin and Luther had a passion for the reformation of structures, doctrine and spirituality along biblical lines - a vision of reform within the church, not the creation of a new church.
"Luther and Pope Leo the 10th were chalk and cheese. It is said that Leo's first reaction was 'Luther is a drunken German, he'll feel differently when he is sober.' But it wasn't Luther who left the church, that's the legend. It was the church that left Luther. That's the truth. At the Diet of Worms in 1521 Lither was excommunicated and declared a political outlaw."
Luther was not persuaded to break away from the church. Why? Schism was the very last thing he wanted. Luther wrote in 1519, "If unfortunately, there are things in Rome which cannot be improved, there is not - and cannot be - any reason for tearing oneself away from the church in schism. Rather, the worse things become, the more one should help her stand by her, for by schism and contempt nothing can be mended."
Lawson also praised American preacher Jonathan Edwards, a frail and asthmatic man, who recovered the meta-narrative and laid the foundation becoming the most effective evangelist and theologian of the Great Awakening.
Lawson said that not only was reformation and revival necessary citing leaders like Whitfield, Wesley, Edwards and others but renewal also, praising ALPHA which has swept Europe, Africa and the U.S. It's now in 130 countries renewing many denominations including the Roman Catholic Church, he said.
Lawson, a converted Jew, said it is because of the meta-narrative of Scripture that he is an Evangelical. It makes sense of the whole salvation story. As C.S. Lewis says, "By it I see everything else."
"My family's roots were in Eastern Europe. I grew up post war under the smoldering cloud of the Holocaust. In our family, Auschwitz was often in our conversation, because many of my grandfather's family died there. I questioned a Rabbi about why God allowed the Holocaust to happen and if God exists and allowed the Holocaust, how could he possibly be good? I got no answers. I became a concert pianist and composer. Someone gave me an essay by C.S. Lewis called 'The Weight of Glory'. It ends in these luminous words, 'I believe in Christianity as I believe in the sun that rises.' That opened up for me a whole world of explanation."
Lawson said he did not condemn the formation of movements like the Anglican Mission in the Americas (AMIA) or the newly formed Anglican Church of North America (ACNA). "I can recall awful stories of bullying, congregations locked out of churches and worse. I have spent time with (Archbishop) Bob Duncan and colleagues in ACNA. All these folk have taken their stand after huge soul searching and prayer. They would certainly say it's because they have been seriously and unmistakably thwarted in their gospel ministry. Given the circumstances I believe these new arrangements must be from God, and I seriously hope the Archbishop of Canterbury will find a way to recognize ACNA as part of the Anglican Communion.
"For those of you who have stayed, I believe this means a call to greater discipleship and uncompromising mission."
You can listen to a recording of his speech at http://canterburytrail.wordpress.com/.
The Rev. Chuck Alley's talk is also posted here: http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=11198
NOTE: The Episcopal Evangelical Assembly are a group of evangelical Episcopalians dedicated to staying in The Episcopal Church.
FOOTNOTE: An archdeacon in North American Anglican terms is the equivalent of a suffragan bishop. He represents the diocese in parishes when the bishop cannot, for reasons of time and other commitments, attend.
END
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| gregory | Posted: 2009/9/15 12:35 Updated: 2009/9/15 12:36 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/8/4 From: Nflorida Posts: 4481 |
Lord, have mercy
Christ, have mercy "Tradition, we are speaking of the context of interpretation and application by which Christ and the Apostles gave us and have been faithfully passed down to this day. This is a very necessary context to understand the Scriptures because they, not us, had the context in which they were writing these things for our benefit. If we interpret them by a context foreign to theirs, we will not get the message they were attempting to convey. The key to understanding this is Jesus Himself, who refused to write anything down, but taught His disciples by His life and words. He took living human beings and entrusted to them His teachings, His context and through them we have the context in which they wrote down what He said and did. If we take their written words out of that context and import them into our own, we have shown our disregard for the Scriptures we claim to hold dear. So, the Church has always considered them most trustworthy method of handing down this context, the method Jesus Himself gave us, by investing it in human lives to hand down to the next generation. Written words on a page will not preserve the message of the Scriptures and to restrict their understanding to only what was written is to by default discard the original context for one's own. Why is this so critical? Because without the context of the Apostles, we can make the Scriptures say anything we wish. Many divergent interpretations have arisen over the years since Christ came, and even within Protestantism one can find many conflicting interpretations of Scriptures. Practically all of them will claim to be getting their teaching from the Scriptures. Most all of them will have a series of verses that prove their point. Most every major heresy in Christian history has promoted itself based upon someone's interpretation of the Scriptures. However, in every case, it can be shown how this interpretation was not the context in which the Apostles and many others after them understood these verses. When no one else has understood it this way before, when it is new and novel, that may be good marketing but it does not make for an understanding consistent with what has gone before. This was essentially the message St. Vincent of Lerins attempted to convey in his work, "A Commonitory". Here is the often quoted section dealing with that. But here some one perhaps will ask, Since the canon of Scripture is complete, and sufficient of itself for everything, and more than sufficient, what need is there to join with it the authority of the Church's interpretation? For this reason,-because, owing to the depth of Holy Scripture, all do not accept it in one and the same sense, but one understands its words in one way, another in another; so that it seems to be capable of as many interpretations as there are interpreters. For Novatian expounds it one way, Sabellius another, Donatus another, Arius, Eunomius, Macedonius, another, Photinus, Apollinaris, Priscillian, another, Iovinian, Pelagius, Celestius, another, lastly, Nestorius another. Therefore, it is very necessary, on account of so great intricacies of such various error, that the rule for the right understanding of the prophets and apostles should be framed in accordance with the standard of Ecclesiastical and Catholic interpretation. (St. Vincent of Lerins, "A Commonitory", Chapter 2.5) In other words, we need to have the right context, the right tradition to understand these the way the Apostles intended and to apply them to our lives in a spiritually beneficial manner. Otherwise, as long as someone can quote Scripture which gives the appearance of logic and authority to a teaching, no one can really question them on it. For how can your context or tradition be any more authoritative than his or hers? The only context with true authority is the Apostles, and the only way to get that context is where it has been passed down faithfully." humbly, gregory |
| jfmckenna | Posted: 2009/9/15 14:10 Updated: 2009/9/15 19:21 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/4 From: Posts: 717 |
I'd just like to clarify something that possibly not everyone picked up on. Lawson quoted Lewis as saying: "I believe in Christianity as I believe in the sun that rises." That should be followed by the statement in the previous paragraph: "By it I see everything else."
Christ is the fulcrum, the solid point, the place to stand where everything else makes sense and from which we can exercise influence. Let's do it! |
| Cennydd | Posted: 2009/9/15 14:45 Updated: 2009/9/16 2:22 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/10/30 From: Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin Posts: 7348 |
I'll go to the core of the thing by saying that the Episcopal Church is entirely to blame for everything that has happened, and I'll venture a step further by saying that because we didn't act soon enough, we aided and abetted this crime against Christ and His Church.
We are to some extent partly responsible for allowing TEC to do as they did. Those who saw this coming years ago failed to act promptly; thinking that "it will all blow over." Well, obviously it didn't, and as a result, we have the mess we now find ourselves in. Some left TEC, but not anywhere nearly enough. Has complacency raised its ugly head? It sure has! Has personal apathy? Yep! And now the cat is out of the bag. How do we put it back? We can't. Is it time to forget about TEC and move on? I think so, but let's not forget about the faithful reasserters who feel trapped because they have nowhere else to go, and we need to remember those who prefer to remain behind in the forlorn hope of reforming their Church. Cennydd |
| hughmc5 | Posted: 2009/9/15 18:55 Updated: 2009/9/15 18:55 |
Not too shy to talk ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/6/11 From: Santa Rosa, CA Posts: 29 |
A Church of England Archdeacon says the behavior of The Episcopal Church has brought about the greatest spiritual catastrophe since the need for the Reformation and that the tear in the fabric of the Anglican Communion is near terminal.
Hear, hear! I guess Lawson likes the Reformers, since he reads Calvin with profit, but the opening paragraph almost sounds like a Romish view of the Reformation! The catastrophe then was Rome's idolatry, as it still is today. For you American Angle-kins, TEC is the catastrophe, not the long overdue schism it's caused. Those who are faithful cannot stay in, anymore than Evangelicals of the post-Tridentine age should stay in the RCC. Doubters: Read Calvin's exhortations in Come Out From Among Them, which teach that staying at a Roman mass (much less kneeling at it! much, much less partaking of it!!) is verboten to those believing in Christ. Thank you, Hugh McCann hughmc5@hotmail.com |
| jfmckenna | Posted: 2009/9/15 19:23 Updated: 2009/9/15 19:23 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/4 From: Posts: 717 |
Rome has seen much reformation since Calvin's day.
|
| Barbie | Posted: 2009/9/16 1:43 Updated: 2009/9/16 1:43 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2009/9/3 From: Posts: 3 |
Did the Church change or did those leading it change? Does your faith tell you to stay in a church that has changed around you and no longer teaches the faith you believe in and the reason you joined? Strong faiths demand strong commitments to yourself 'faith', to your church, to God. Do you wobble in two commitments to stay with the church? Do you really take comfort of going to the same church over loyalty to God and faith?
God's promises are for ever. The church is for this mortal life. Barb |
| larsil | Posted: 2009/9/16 13:07 Updated: 2009/9/16 13:07 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/10/23 From: near Pittsburgh Posts: 254 |
Every time I read the title of this article, I notice another facet.
Is this author saying that the REFORMATION was a CATASTROPHE? Regardless of one's take on the current morass, where does Adcn. Lawson stand on the historic persepective of the Reformation? "Inquiring minds want to know!" ---L. |
| Baring-G | Posted: 2009/9/16 21:51 Updated: 2009/9/16 21:51 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2007/8/8 From: Republic of Florida Posts: 172 |
As one brought up in the sterile world of Calvinism,I urge Evangelical Anglicans to read the writings of the Wesley Brothers and the Fathers of the Church.Calvinism is heresy and I am glad that as a teenager I rejected Presbyterianism and was instructed by a great Anglo-Catholic priest (and later he became a bishop ).Arminianism is the true teaching of historic Anglicanism. Leave Calvinism to the Orthodox Presbyterians and the Primitive Baptists. Fr Baring-Gould +
|
| jfmckenna | Posted: 2009/9/18 13:11 Updated: 2009/9/18 13:11 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/4 From: Posts: 717 |
No, he said, "greatest spiritual catastrophe since THE NEED FOR the Reformation." Actually, this may be a greater catastrophe, because in spite of the pre-Reformation deficiencies etc., at least it didn't have to do with who Jesus Christ was and the other creedal essentials. But when resolutions were proposed before General Convention about the uniqueness of Christ, they were defeated.
|
| LuxRex | Posted: 2009/9/21 17:44 Updated: 2009/9/21 18:00 |
Quite a regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/12/27 From: Posts: 58 |
"At the Diet of Worms in 1521 Lither was excommunicated and declared a political outlaw."
Not to nit-pick, but not quite right. Luther was excommunicated, he didn't leave, however this was done by the papal bull Exsurge Domine of 1520, which gave him 60 days to retract his teachings. This was the famous bull that likened Luther to a wild boar in the vineyard. Luther responded by famously burning the bull...and papal cannon law, at the site of what is the "Luther Oak" today in Wittenberg. Given that similarly faithful priests and bishops are being "excommunicated" via papal bull a la Schori, merely for the "sin" of seeking alternative oversight, I think it is very unfair to liken them to Donatists or anabaptists. However, as the Archdeacon says toward the end, "Given the circumstances I believe these new arrangements must be from God, and I seriously hope the Archbishop of Canterbury will find a way to recognize ACNA as part of the Anglican Communion." I appreciate his thoughfulness. |


















