ACNA '09:Okay ACNA's the Answer: Now What Was the Question? by Gary L'Hommedieu
Commentary
By Canon Gary L'Hommedieu in Bedford, Texas
www.virtueonline.org
6/22/09
The Anglican Church of North America (ACNA) opened its inaugural assembly today with a mass in St. Vincent's Cathedral in Bedford, TX. This "birth moment" has been a long time coming. It is the culmination, some would say of years, others would say decades, still others centuries, of work depending on which pair of glasses you're wearing.
That's just it: what is the proper lens for looking at this event? Is it the response to the consecration of Gene Robinson, or female clergy, this or that Prayer Book, or TEC's utter capitulation to the secular culture, or (most likely) all of the above? Is it the last straw, or the last straw man?
What lens are we looking through? What hat are we wearing? What metaphor are we using, even unconsciously, to formulate our questions and thus our answers? Make no mistake. The questions determine the answers.
Here's what we do know. By Wednesday, Bishop Bob Duncan will emerge as Archbishop of a new North American Anglican Province, which this afternoon approved its own Constitution and Canons. It is now a social reality with a covenantal basis for making statements that amount to something besides the opinions of scattered individuals. It might even be possible for representatives of this new jurisdiction to make theological statements that a body of faithful can believe.
We also know that not every Anglican Province will recognize the new entity, beginning with the former sole proprietors of the Anglican franchise in North America, The Episcopal Church and The Anglican Church of Canada.
Critics will quip that Duncan's been maneuvering for a special title all along, and the other players for their several fiefdoms. But this criticism says more about the critics than it does about ACNA.
Liberal churchmen, by necessity, are in the religious game for the power and prestige. After all, what else is there? Since Christianity is irrelevant to liberals except as a way of promoting the UN, all that's left is power and privilege. Anyway, the new Anglicans don't need the liberals to remind them that conservative egos will be on parade over the next few days. This is not shocking news.
Here's what else we know about the emergent Anglican jurisdiction gathered in Texas: a lot, perhaps even most, of the other Anglican Provinces will recognize it. Some will no longer recognize the former proprietorships in North America, who are seen as having failed in their stewardship of the Gospel.
Seven hundred delegates and attendees will join for three and a half days of worship and fellowship. Internationally known super-pastor Rick Warren will address the assembly, noting the importance of ACNA on the American missionary scene. Metropolitan Jonah of the Orthodox Church of America will address participants on the historic significance of this moment relative to the mission of Christian orthodoxy--with both lower and upper case "o".
Anglicans and other onlookers, whether observing from the floor or distantly via internet, bring a jumble of expectations. Undefined expectations usually translate into disappointment, whether a lot or a little. Some will inevitably be disappointed, for example, if they are expecting ACNA to solve the riddle of being Catholic but not Roman. If we're wearing the hat of "history", we might speculate that the recent history of the Western Anglican Provinces has forced that riddle out into the open as wishful thinking, or perhaps a contradiction in terms.
In his opening address, Bishop Duncan made references to history. He referred to "a great Reformation of the Christian Church underway", involving "much of mainline Protestantism" as well as Pentecostals and Western Anglicans. Bishop Duncan described the attraction of Anglicanism to these Protestant brethren in terms of "the Great Tradition", the coinage of the late Robert Webber.
"This explains why there is such a keen interest in what is happening here these days among our Catholic and Orthodox brothers and sisters."
The bottom line: God "is again Re-Forming His Church." Of course the Church's enemy the Devil "will attempt to lure us back to old ways and old hurts and old fights."
While this is a practical warning that everyone got, it goes beyond sound pastoral advice. It shows that the Archbishop-elect understands the moment, perhaps profoundly. The present moment is not a final reaction to TEC or post-modernity or North American secular culture. It is a time for reacting entirely to Jesus Christ, and not to "all kinds of idols and lesser gods" which typically have held North American Anglicans in thrall.
I spoke earlier about viewing the present through the appropriate lens. Bishop Duncan also spoke about interpreting events by looking through the right lens.
"All that is ahead is to be seen through this lens of Christ's atoning death and his glorious resurrection and ascension, and of the imparting of the Holy Spirit."
If he had said this apart from the new Reformation, it would have fallen flat. It would have been a platitude, predictable, not particularly elegant and certainly not revealing. But Duncan was not referring to the lens of traditional Christian piety. Tradition in the abstract is not the same as the Great Tradition, being more like the Great Proof Text. It could be that not many of us "traditionalists" have awakened to the living quality of Tradition. It could also be that this is the meaning, at least in part, of the history that now unfolds before our eyes.
The eternal truth of the Incarnation is the only thing that can level the field and make the present moment new. History might also be saying that, until now, we've all been asking the wrong questions. Hence, even our tentative answers are predetermined to be distorted.
"Turning us back toward one another and toward the global mainstream has been God's great and sovereign work." Sounds like a profound reflection on the meaning of History... or Tradition.
---The Rev. Canon J. Gary L'Hommedieu is Canon for Pastoral Care at the Cathedral Church of St. Luke, Orlando, Florida, and a regular columnist for VirtueOnline.
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| quissum | Posted: 2009/6/23 11:09 Updated: 2009/6/23 11:09 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/18 From: Posts: 337 |
Canon L'Hommedieu's comments I find always probing and insightful. His cautious optimism for the new province in these confused and deluded (delusional?) times seems quite appropriate. The 'birth pangs' have been excruciating and fraught with uncertainty.
Why, for example, feature Rick Warren? While one can appreciate his solid evangelical stature (and evangelical for me is a word that means historic Christian orthodoxy), what benediction can he offer an Anglican gathering except his celebrity? How much better were James Packer or John Stott present, or some of the Global South bishops who first offered a hand of hope to North American Anglicans when the 'evangelical' bishops of TEC showed themselves not only impotent against apostacy but resistent to such 'interventions' for the sake of a false 'unity'? And without a clearer stance on Women's ordination, ACNA's claim to represent apostolic or even Anglican orthodoxy must, in my opinion, be kept on hold. |
| btaylor | Posted: 2009/6/23 12:21 Updated: 2009/6/23 12:21 |
Quite a regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/6/26 From: California Posts: 65 |
Answering quissum’s concerns could be difficult, but let me give it a shot.
Why Rick Warren and not Packer or Stott? Because of the litigation in process, most of us are facing, are have already faced, losing all of our buildings, property, and assets. One of the most important issues we face is how to start over with nothing but our faith. Rick Warren started Saddleback Church with three members and a Visa card. He knows how to do this. He speaks with a voice of authority on this issue. He knows how to keep the main thing, the main thing and build a church on the pillars of the gospel. Packer and Stott are great Christian men, great authors, great witnesses to the faith, but they don’t have the specific skill set to be able to help in this arena. Your wish to keep everything on hold while settling the issue of women’s ordination is interesting. In Mark’s Gospel we find Jesus saying, “These signs will follow those who believe in my name…” So, during the past 30 years while we have been debating the issue of women’s ordination, what signs are following you? How many people have you brought to Christ? How many demons have you cast out? How many people have you healed? How many have you lead into the baptism of the Holy Spirit? My guess is that you will not even attempt to answer the question but will instead fire off some attack against either me or those who believe that it is alright to ordain women. Keeping things on hold is not a strategy ever employed by Jesus, and shouldn’t be for us. |
| LocoOwl | Posted: 2009/6/23 15:24 Updated: 2009/6/23 15:24 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/1/13 From: South Carolina Posts: 91 |
Quote:
Your wish to keep everything on hold while settling the issue of women’s ordination is interesting. So, your answer is to "Keep on truckin'!" Had you been in Corinth in St. Paul's day, would you recommend not dealing with the issue of the man having sexual relations with his step mother rather than dealing with it definitively? Or would you recommend just keeping on while people were getting drunk during the agape meals? Would you recommend just keeping on while people are saying "I belong to Apollos," or "I belong to Cephas," or "I belong to Paul?" So Rick Warren knows how to plant churches. Surely the African leaders who have sponsored the ACNA know how to plant churches! The question is not whether one can plant a church; the question is just what sort of church is one planting? Rick Warren is not an Anglican. I can see him leading a workshop on church planting, but to address the entire ACNA at its inaugural meeting is a slap to your African allies and to other evangelical leaders such as J.I. Packer and John Stott. As for your litigation woes, you could have solved that by just walking away from the buildings. Then you would not have had to spend the much-needed seed money paying lawyers. Had that ever occurred to you? It is very important to know just what doctrines a church body is going to uphold. ACNA claims to be in the lineage of the Ecumenical Councils. I have news for you: no Ecumenical Council ever approved the ordination of women to the priesthood. ACNA, by allowing this "innovation," has departed from the 2000 year tradition of the Church Catholic. Seems to me you have bigger problems than just planting churches. You still have to figure out just what kind of "church" you want to be. Right now it looks like you want to be the Episcopal Church without gay bishops. That is not enough to last for the long haul, in my opinion. Don't get me wrong, I wish the ACNA well. But until it confronts and really deals with the issue of ordination of women, it will be less than effective. There certainly will be problems in any unification talks with Rome or the Eastern tradition. |
| ACLins | Posted: 2009/6/23 21:31 Updated: 2009/6/23 21:31 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/3/31 From: Kentucky Posts: 234 |
Excellent! This is both the question and the answer: "The eternal truth of the Incarnation is the only thing that can level the field and make the present moment new."
The mystery of the Incarnation is also what illumines our understanding of the sacramental life of the Church, the male priesthood, and what it means to be a Christian. |
| esniii | Posted: 2009/6/24 14:07 Updated: 2009/6/24 14:07 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/3/29 From: Posts: 385 |
WO seems to be a puzzle for us, which we have in turn exported to other Anglican churches.
What the OP said was to reserve the mantle of orthodoxy until the WO question was sorted out; my guess would be he would be in agreement with you about going forward in any case, just more muted because of that particular underlying question: how should Christ's Ecclesia relate to the (pagan?) society of this church, as opposed to Corinth, Jerusalem, Rome or any of the other churches of the NT. What message, what guidance, what grace should we be bringing to those around us? |














